Abstract
The drinking behavior of individual chicks (n = 168) was studied in two discrimination situations when the individual was alone or with an audience of merely present (not drinking) or coacting (drinking) conspecifics. In one discrimination task, a familiar and an unfamiliar drinking tube (FU) were presented simultaneously; in the other discrimination task, two unfamiliar tubes (UU) were presented. The coacting audience received a familiar and an unfamiliar tube; their familiar tube was always unfamiliar to the subject. Subjects drank more when conspecifics were present, intake being highest in the presence of coacting conspecifics. Intake was higher in the FU discrimination than in UU. However, in the UU discrimination, individuals that were tested with coactors drank most of their total intake from the tube that was similar to the coactors’ familiar tube. In the FU task, individual subjects drank mostly from their familiar tube in each social condition. However, this effect was smaller for those tested with coacting conspecifics than for those tested with merely present conspecifics.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bateson, P. P. G., &Jaeckel, J. B. (1976). Chicks’ preference for familiar and novel conspicuous objects after different periods of exposure.Animal Behaviour,24, 386–390.
Church, R. M. (1968). Applications of behavior theory to social psychology: Imitation and competition. In E. C. Simmel, R. A. Hoppe, & G. A. Milton (Eds.),Social facilitation and imitative behavior (pp. 135–167). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Clayton, D. A. (1978). Socially-facilitated behavior.The Quarterly Review of Biology,53, 373–392.
Davis, J. M. (1973). Imitation: A review and critique. In P. P. G. Bateson & P. H. Klopfer (Eds.).Perspectives in ethology (pp. 43–72). New York: Plenum Press.
Gardner, E. L., &Engel, D. R. (1971). Imitation and social facilitatory aspects of observational learning in the laboratory rat.Psychonomic Science,25, 5–6.
Geen, R. G., &Gagné, J. J. (1977). Drive theory of social facilitation: Twelve years of theory and research.Psychological Bulletin,84, 1267–1288.
Rajecki, D. W., Kidd, R. F., &Ivins, B. (1976). Social facilitation in chickens: A different level of analysis.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,12, 233–246.
Rajecki, D. W., Kidd, R. F., Wilder, D. A., &Jaeger, J. (1975). Social factors in the facilitation of feeding chickens: Effects of imitation, arousal, or disinhibition?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,32, 510–518.
Strobel, M. G. (1972). Social facilitation of operant behavior in satiated rats.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,80, 502–508.
Strobel, M. G., &MacDonald, G. E. (1974). Induction of eating in newly hatched chicks.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,86, 493–502.
Thorpe, W. H. (1963).Learning and instinct in animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tolman, C. W., &Wilson, G. F. (1965). Social feeding in the domestic chick.Animal Behaviour,13, 134–142.
Turner, E. R. A. (1964). Social feeding in birds.Behaviour,24, 1–46.
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation.Science,149, 269–274.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Compresence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.),Psychology of group influence (pp. 35–59). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zajonc, R. B., Heingartner, A., &Herman, E. M. (1969). Social enhancement and impairment of performance in the cockroach.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,13, 83–92.
Zentall, T. R., &Levine, J. M. (1972). Observational learning and social facilitation in the rat.Science,178, 1220–1221.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franchina, J.J., Dyer, A.B., Zaccaro, S.J. et al. Socially facilitated drinking behavior in chicks (Gallus domesticus): Relative effects of drive and stimulus mechanisms. Animal Learning & Behavior 14, 218–222 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200059
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200059