Abstract
The blocking phenomenon was investigated in the sexual response system of male Japanese quail. Access to a live female quail served as the unconditioned stimulus (US). The same audiovisual cue served as the pretrained stimulus in all of the experiments. Following asymptotic conditioning of the audiovisual cue, a second conditioned stimulus (CS2) was added. In Experiment 1, CS2 was a rectangular wood block that had little or no resemblance to a female quail and could not support copulatory behavior. In Experiment 2, CS2 was a terrycloth object that had no quail parts but could support copulatory behavior, and, in Experiment 3, CS2 was a terrycloth object that had a taxidermically prepared head of a female quail added. The terrycloth-only object supported more rapid conditioning than did the wood block, but the blocking effect was obtained with both kinds of stimuli. Approach responding to the terrycloth + head object required pairing it with copulatory opportunity, and the terrycloth + head object supported at least as rapid conditioning as did the terrycloth-only object. However, responding to the terrycloth + head object was not blocked by the pretrained audiovisual cue. These results indicate that the blocking effect occurs in sexual conditioning even with stimulus objects that can support copulation. However, the addition of species-typical head cues to an object makes that object such a powerful stimulus that conditioned approach responding to it cannot be blocked by a previously conditioned arbitrary audiovisual cue.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baker, A. G., &Mackintosh, N. J. (1977). Excitatory and inhibitory conditioning following uncorrelated presentations of CS and UCS.Animal Learning & Behavior,5, 315–319.
Carr, F. A. (1974). Latent inhibition and overshadowing in conditioned emotional response conditioning with rats.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,68, 718–723
Crawford, L. L., &Akins, C. K. (1993). Stimulus control of copulatory behavior in male Japanese quail.Poultry Science,72, 722–727.
Crawford, L. L., &Domjan, M. (1993). Sexual approach conditioning: Omission contingency tests.Animal Learning & Behavior,21, 42–50
Domjan, M. (1983). Biological constraints on instrumental and classical conditioning: Implications for general process theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.).The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 215–277). Orlando, FL: Academic Press
Domjan, M. (1992). Adult learning and mate choice: Possibilities and experimental evidence.American Zoologist,32, 48–61.
Domjan, M., Greene, P., &North, N. C. (1989). Contextual conditioning and the control of copulatory behavior by species-specific sign stimuli in male Japanese quail.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,15, 147–153.
Domjan, M., Huber-McDonald, M., &Holloway, K. S. (1992). Conditioning copulatory behavior to an artificial object: Efficacy of stimulus fading.Animal Learning & Behavior,20, 350–362.
Domjan, M., Lyons, R., North, N. C., &Bruell, J. (1986). Sexual Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior in male Japanese quail (Cotumix commix japonica).Journal of Comparative Psychology,100, 413–421.
Domjan, M.,&Nash, S. (1988). Stimulus control of social behavior in male Japanese quail,Coturnix coturnix japonica.Animal Behaviour,36, 1006–1015.
Domjan, M., O’Vary, D., &Greene, P (1988). Conditioning of appetitive and consummatory behavior in male Japanese quail.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,50, 505–519.
Domjan, M., &Ravert, R. D. (1991). Discriminating the sex of conspecifics by male Japanese quail (Cotumix cotumix japonica).Journal of Comparative Psychology,105, 157–164.
Feldman, J M. (1975). Blocking as a function of added cue intensity.Animal Learning & Behavior,3, 98–102.
Foree, D. D., &LoLordo, V. M. (1973). Attention in the pigeon: The differential effect of food getting vs. shock avoidance procedures.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,85, 551–558.
Gamzu, E. R., &Williams, D. R. (1973) Associative factors underying the pigeon’s key pecking in auto-shaping procedures.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.19, 225–232.
Holloway, K. S., &Domjan, M. (1993). Sexual approach conditioning: Unconditioned stimulus factors.Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes,19, 38–46.
Kamin, J. K. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In A. B. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.),Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279–296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
LoLordo, V. M., Jacobs, W. J., &Foree, D. D. (1982). Failure to block control by a relevant stimulus.Animal Learning & Behavior,10, 183–192.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1973). Stimulus selection: Learning to ignore stimuli that predict no change in reinforcement. In R. A. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.),Constraints on learning (pp. 75–100). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Matzel, L. D., Schachtman, T. R., &Miller, R. R. (1988). Learned irrelevance exceeds the sum of CS pre-exposure and US pre-exposure deficits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 311–319.
Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning.Psychological Review,84, 61–73.
Rescorla, R. A. (1971). Variation in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement following prior inhibitory conditioning.Learning & Motivation,2, 113–123,
Rescorla, R. A., &Furrow, D. R. (1977). Stimulus similarity as a determinant of Pavlovian conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,3, 203–215.
Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds),Classical conditioning II (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Testa, T. J. (1975). Effects of similarity of location and temporal in tensity pattern of conditioned suppression in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,1, 114–121.
Tomie, A., Murphy, A. L., Fath, S., &Jackson, R. L. (1980). Retardation of autoshaping following pretraining with unpredictable food. Effects of changing the context between pretraining and testing.Learning & Motivation,11, 230–238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research was supported by Grants INT-9122748 from the National Science Foundation and MH39940 from the National Institute of Mental Health. The experiments were conducted while F. Köksal was a visiting scientist at the University of Texas.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Köksal, F., Domjan, M. & Weisman, G. Blocking of the sexual conditioning of differentially effective conditioned stimulus objects. Animal Learning & Behavior 22, 103–111 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199962
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199962