Abstract
In four experiments, rat subjects were used in appetitive Pavlovian magazine-approach and instrumental conditioning procedures. Experiments 1 and 2 found successful blocking of the Pavlovian conditioning of X when it was reinforced in an AX compound after prior conditioning of A. This occurred whether the outcome following AX was the same as or qualitatively different from what followed A. Experiment 3 repeated those findings but also used a transfer procedure to identify the individual associations between X and outcomes. Stimulus X developed an association with the outcome following AX when that outcome differed from that following A alone but not when it was the same as that following A alone. Experiment 4 repeated that pattern of observations for the case of an X that was an instrumental discriminative stimulus. These results suggest that different associative structures may result from a qualitatively changed and unchanged outcome in a blocking experiment. The results are related to comparable findings for the case of overexpectation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bakal, C. W., Johnson, R. D., &Rescorla, R. A. (1974). The effect of change in US quality on the blocking effect.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science,9, 97–103.
Betts, S. L., Brandon, S. E., &Wagner, A. R. (1996). Dissociation of the blocking of conditioned eyeblink and conditioned fear following a shift in US locus.Animal Learning & Behavior,24, 459–470.
Blaisdell, A. P., Denniston, J. C., &Miller, R. R. (1997). Unblocking with qualitative change of unconditioned stimulus.Learning & Motivation,28, 268–279.
Colwill, R. M., &Rescorla, R. A. (1985). Post-conditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,11, 120–132.
Colwill, R. M., &Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Associations between the discriminative stimulus and the reinforcer in instrumental learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 155–164.
Cotton, M. M., Goodall, G., &Mackintosh, N. J. (1982). Inhibitory conditioning from a reduction in the magnitude of reinforcement.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,34B, 163–180.
Delamater, A. (1996). Effects of several extinction treatments upon the integrity of Pavlovian stimulus-outcome associations.Animal Learning & Behavior,24, 437–449.
Dickinson, A., Hall, G., &Mackintosh, N. J. (1976). Surprise and the attenuation of blocking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,2, 313–322.
Ganesan, R., &Pearce, J. M. (1988). Effect of changing the unconditioned stimulus on appetitive blocking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 280–291.
Holland, P. C. (1984). Unblocking in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 476–497.
Holland, P. C. (1988). Excitation and inhibition in unblocking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 261–279.
Kamin, L. J. (1968). Attention-like processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.),Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior: Aversive stimuli (pp. 9–32). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.
Konorski, J. (1967).Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Miller, R. R., &Matzel, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 22, pp. 51–92). New York: Academic Press.
Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model of stimulus generalization for Pavlovian conditioning.Psychological Review,84, 61–73.
Rescorla, R. A. (1992). Associations between an instrumental discriminative stimulus and multiple outcomes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,18, 95–104.
Rescorla, R. A. (1993). Inhibitory associations between S and R in extinction.Animal Learning & Behavior,21, 327–336.
Rescorla, R. A. (1996). Preservation of Pavlovian associations through extinction.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49B, 245–258.
Rescorla, R. A. (1997a). Spontaneous recovery after Pavlovian conditioning with multiple outcomes.Animal Learning & Behavior,25, 99–107.
Rescorla, R. A. (1997b). Spontaneous recovery of instrumental discriminative responding.Animal Learning & Behavior,25, 485–497.
Rescorla, R. A. (1998). Instrumental learning: Nature and persistence. In M. Sabourin, F. I. M. Craik, & M. Roberts (Eds.),Proceedings of the XXVI International Congress of Psychology: Vol. 2. Advances in psychological science: Biological and cognitive aspects (pp. 239–257). London: Psychology Press.
Rescorla, R. A. (1999). Summation and overexpectation with qualitatively different outcomes.Animal Learning & Behavior,27, 50–62.
Rescorla, R. A., &Holland, P. C. (1982). Behavioral studies of associative learning in animals. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.),Annual review of psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 265–308). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
Wagner, A. R. (1976). Priming in STM: An information-processing mechanism for self-generated or retrieval-generated depression in performance. In T. J. Tighe & R. N. Leaton (Eds.),Habituation: Perspectives from child development, animal behavior, and neurophysiology (pp. 95–128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wagner, A. R., Mazur, J. E., Donegan, N. H., &Pfautz, P. L. (1980). Evaluation of blocking and conditioned inhibition to a CS signaling a decrease in US intensity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,6, 376–385.
Watt, A., &Honey, R. C. (1997). Combining CSs associated with the same or different USs.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50B, 350–367.
Williams, B. A. (1994). Blocking despite changes in reinforcer identity.Animal Learning & Behavior,22, 442–457.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant IBN94-04676.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rescorla, R.A. Learning about qualitatively different outcomes during a blocking procedure. Animal Learning & Behavior 27, 140–151 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199671
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199671