Abstract
The effects of the intertrial interval (ITI) on learning and performance in Pavlovian appetitive serial feature positive (SFP) discriminations were examined in three experiments with rats. With longer ITIs, acquisition was more rapid, and there was less transfer of the feature’s behavioral control to a separately trained target cue, suggesting that longer ITIs encouraged the use of an occasion setting strategy. Behavior was also affected by discrimination-specific ITIs. Rats were trained with two SFP discriminations. The overall ITI was held constant, but the intervals between trials of one discrimination were varied by intermixing different numbers of trials from the other discrimination. Learning was more rapid when the intervals between trials of a single discrimination were longer. A sequential analyses showed that performance on a trial was impaired when it was preceded by a trial that included the same target cue but with the opposite trial outcome. The results are discussed in the frameworks of proactive interference effects and deletion-comparator processes (Cooper, Aronson, Balsam, & Gibbon, 1990.)
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cooper, L. D., Aronson, L., Balsam, P. D., &Gibbon, J. (1990). Duration of signals for intertrial reinforcement and nonreinforcement in random control procedures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,16, 14–26.
Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing.Psychological Review,84, 279–325.
Gibbon, J., Baldock, M. D., Locurto, C. M., Gold, L., &Terrace, H. S. (1977). Trial and intertrial durations in autoshaping.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,3, 264–284.
Gibbon, J., &Balsam, P. (1981). Spreading association in time. In C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, & J. Gibbon (Eds.),Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 219–253). New York: Academic Press.
Gormezano, I., &Moore, J. W. (1969). Classical conditioning. In M. H. Marx (Ed.),Learning: Processes (pp. 121–203). London: MacMillan.
Grant, D. S. (1975). Proactive interference in pigeon short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,1, 207–220.
Han, J. S., Gallagher, M., &Holland, P. C. (1998). Hippocampal lesions enhance configural learning by reducing proactive interference.Hippocampus,8, 138–146.
Hogan, D. E., Edwards, C. A., &Zentall, T. R. (1981). Delayed matching in the pigeon: Interference produced by the prior delayed matching trial.Animal Learning & Behavior,9, 395–400.
Holland, P. C. (1977). Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,3, 77–104.
Holland, P. C. (1989a). Feature extinction enhances transfer of occasion setting.Animal Learning & Behavior,17, 269–279.
Holland, P. C. (1989b). Transfer of negative occasion setting and conditioned inhibition across conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,15, 311–328.
Holland, P. C. (1992). Occasion setting in Pavlovian conditioning. In D. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 28, pp. 69–125). San Diego: Academic Press.
Holland, P. C. (1995). The effects of intertrial interval (ITI) on learning and performance of serial feature positive discriminations.Animal Learning & Behavior,23, 411–428.
Kehoe, E. J., Cool, V., &Gormezano, I. (1991). Trace conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response as a function of CS-US interstimulus interval and trials per session.Learning & Motivation,22, 269–290.
Mustaca, A. E., Gabelli, F., Papini, M. R., &Balsam, P. (1991). The effects of varying the interreinforcement interval on appetitive contextual conditioning.Animal Learning & Behavior,19, 125–138.
Niemark, E. D., Greenhouse, P., Law, S., &Weinheimer, S. (1965). The effect of rehearsal preventing tasks upon retention of CVC syllables.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,4, 280–285.
Papini, M. R., &Dudley, R. T. (1993). Effects of the number of trials per session on autoshaping in rats.Learning & Motivation,24, 175–193.
Pontecorvo, M. J. (1983). Effects of proactive interference on rats’ continuous nonmatching-to-sample performance.Animal Learning & Behavior,11, 356–366.
Roberts, W. A., &Kraemer, P. J. (1982). Some observations of the effects of intertrial interval and delay on delayed matching to sample in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology,8, 342–353.
Roitblat, H. L., &Scopatz, R. A. (1983). Sequential effects in pigeon delayed matching-to-sample performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,9, 202–221.
Spence, K. W., &Norris, E. B. (1950). Eyelid conditioning as a function of the inter-trial interval.Journal of Experimental Psychology,40, 716–720.
Wright, A. A., Urcuioli, P. J., &Sands, S. F. (1986). Proactive interference in animal memory. In D. F. Kendrick, M. E. Rilling, & M. R. Denny (Eds.),Theories of animal memory (pp. 101–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Mental Health. The author thanks Marie Crock, Corey McNamee, and John Chen for technical assistance.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holland, P.C. Intertrial interval effects in pavlovian serial feature positive discriminations. Animal Learning & Behavior 27, 127–139 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199670
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199670