Abstract
A communication paradigm was used as an analogue to cued-recall to separate age-related differences in encoding and retrieval. Younger and older adults (senders) generated a series of one-word clues that would enable other subjects (receivers) to generate a designated target word. Clue and target generation tasks, analogous to the encoding and retrieval components of cued recall, were conducted in the context of either a strong or a weak associate of the target. Clues generated by older senders were less effective than clues generated by younger senders in enabling receivers to generate targets, especially when clues or targets were generated in the context of a weak associate. A deficit among older receivers was also obtained, especially when a weak-rather than a strong-associate context word was given to the receiver. Older adults experience difficulty with encoding and retrieval tasks that require processing of context-specific information that is not part of the generic information typically associated with a stimulus.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Begg, I. (1978). Similarity and contrast in memory for relations.Memory & Cognition,6. 509–517.
Begg, I., &Clark, J. M. (1975). Contextual imagery in meaning and memory.Memory & Cognition,3, 117–122.
Begg, I., Upfold, D., &Wilton, T. (1978). Imagery in verbal communication.Journal of Mental Imagery,2, 165–186.
Begg, I., &White, P. (1985). Encoding specificity in interpersonal communication.Canadian Journal of Psychology,39, 70–87.
Bilodeau, E. A., &Howell, D. C. (1965).Free association norms (Catalog No. D210.2:F87). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Burke, D. M., &Harrold, R. M. (1988). Automatic and effortful semantic processes in old age: Experimental and naturalistic approaches. In L. L. Light & D. M. Burke (Eds.),language, memory and aging (pp. 100–116). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.),Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms ami performances (pp. 409–422). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Craik, F. I. M., &Byrd, M. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficite: The role of attentional resources. In F. I. M. Craik & S. E. Trehub (Eds.),Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 191–211). New York: Plenum.
Craik, F. I. M., &McDowd, J. M. (1987). Age differences in recall and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 474–479.
Craik, F. I. M., &Simon, E. (1980). Age differences in memory: The role of attention and depth of processing. In L. W, Poon, J. L. Fozard, L. S. Cermak, & L. W. Thompson (Eds.),New directions in memory and aging; Proceedings of the George A. Tatland Memorial Conference (pp. 95–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Demming, J. A., &Pressey, S. L. (1957). Tests indigenous to the adult and older years.Journal of Counselling Psychology,4, 144–148.
Durso, F.T., &O’Sullivan, C.S. (1983). Naming and remembering proper and common nouns and pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 497–510.
Harris, G., Begg, I., &Upfold, D. (1980). On the role of the speaker’s expectations in interpersonal communication.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 597–607.
Hess, T. M., &Higgins, J. N. (1983), Context utilization in young and old adults.Journal of Gerontology,38, 65–71.
Mitchell, D. B., &Perlmutter, M. (1986). Semantic activation and episodic memory: Age similarities and differences.Developmental Psychology,22, 86–94.
Park, D. C, Puglisi, J. T., Smith, A. D., &Dudley, W. N. (1987). Cue utilization and encoding specificity in picture recognition by older adults.Journal of Gerontology,42, 423–425.
Perlmutter, M. (1979). Age differences in the consistency of adults associative responses.Experimental Aging Research,5, 549–553.
Perlmutter, M. (1986). A life-span view of memory. In P. B. Baltes, D. L. Feadierman, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.),Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 271–313). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perlmutter, M., &Mitchell, D. B. (1982). The appearance and disappearance of age differences in aduit memory. In F. I. M. Craik & S. E. Trshub (Eds.),Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 127–144). New York: Plenum.
Postman, L., &Keppel, G. (1970).Norms of word association. New York: Academic Press.
Pugusi, J. T., Park, D. C, Smith, A. D. A., Dudley, W. N. (1988). Age differences in encoding specificity.Journal of Gerontology,43, 145–150.
Rabinowitz, J. C. (1989). Judgments of origin and generation effects: Comparisons between young and elderly adults.Psychology & Aging,3, 259–268.
Rabinowitz, J. C, Craik, F. I. M., &Ackerman, B. P. (1982). A processing resource account of age differences in recall,Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 325–344.
Riegel, K. F. (1965).Free associative responses to 200 stimuli of the Michigan restricted association norms. (USPHS Tech. Rep. No. 8, Grant MH076I9). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Simon, E. (1979). Depth and elaboration of processing in relation to age.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 115–124.
Tulving, E. A., Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 352–373.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant A7910 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to M. Masson.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Micco, A., Masson, M.E.J. Age-related differences in the specificity of verbal encoding. Memory & Cognition 20, 244–253 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199661
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199661