Abstract
Three albino rats were exposed to a differential-punishment-of-other-behavior shock schedule superimposed on a variable-interval schedule of food presentation. With this arrangement, failure to barpress for a specified interval since the previous response resulted in delivery of shock. This procedure reliably decreased the number of specified pauses and was accompanied by increases in barpress rates and shifts in the distribution of responses. Subsequent exposure to noncontingent shock produced similar, but quantitatively smaller, changes for two of the three subjects. Training with barpress-dependent shock and reexposure to noncontingent shock further diminished these effects. This study demonstrates that pauses are conditionable units of behavior insofar as they are sensitive to a punishment contingency. In terms of the targeted unit of behavior, the current findings are similar to those obtained with barpress-dependent or interresponse-time-dependent shock schedules and suggest a continuum of response specification.
References
Anger, D. The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1956,52, 145–161.
Beavers, W. O., &Perkins, C. C. Punishment of nonspecific responses: Does the negative half of the law of effect apply?Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1977,9, 14–16.
Bersh, P. J., &Alloy, L. B. Avoidance based on shock intensity reduction with no change in shock probability.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1978,30, 293–300.
Bond, N. W., Blackman, D. E., &Scruton, P. Suppression of operant behavior and schedule-induced licking in rats.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973,20, 375–383.
Dinsmoor, J. A. Escape, avoidance, punishment: Where do we stand?Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1977,28, 83–95.
Domjan, M. P. Superstitions escape in the albino rat.Psychological Record, 1969,19, 53–58.
Dunham, P. J., &Grantmyre, J. Changes in a multiple-response repertoire during response-contingent punishment and response restriction: Sequential relationships.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1982,37, 123–133.
Ferster, C. B. Control of behavior in chimpanzees and pigeons by time out from positive reinforcement.Psychological Monographs, 1958,72, 1–38.
Flory, R. K., &Lickfett, G. C. Effects of lick-contingent timeout on schedule-induced polydipsia.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,21, 45–55.
Franks, G. J., &Lattal, K. A. Antecedent reinforcement schedule training and operant response reinstatement in rats.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1976,4, 374–378.
Galbicka, G., &Branch, M. N. Selective punishment of interresponse times.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1981,35, 311–322.
Herrnstein, R. J., &Hineline, P. N. Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1966,9, 421–430.
Herrnstein, R. J., &Sidman, M. Avoidance conditioning as a factor in the effects of unavoidable shock on food-reinforced behavior.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1958,51, 380–385.
Kelleher, R. T., &Morse, W. H. Schedules using noxious stimuli. HI. Responding maintained with response produced electric shocks.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 819–838.
Laties, V. G., Weiss, B., Clark, R. L., &Reynolds, M. D. Overt “mediating” behavior during temporally spaced responding.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1965,8, 107–116.
Lattal, K. A. Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975,23, 241–246.
Lattal, K. A., &Poling, A. D. Describing response-event relations: Babel revisited.Behavior Analyst, 1981,4, 143–152.
Rachlin, H. Recovery of responses during mild punishment.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1966,9, 251–263.
Rachlin, H., &Herrnstein, R. J. Hedonism revisited: On the negative law of effect. In B. S. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.),Punishment and aversive behavior. New York: Appleton, 1969.
Schuster, R., &Rachlin, H. Indifference between punishment and free shock: Evidence for the negative law of effect.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 777–786.
Shimp, C. P. Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1966,9, 443–455.
Shimp, C. P. The concurrent reinforcement of two interresponse times: The relative frequency of an interresponse time equals its relative harmonic length.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969,12, 403–411.
Sidman, M., Herrnstein, R. J., &Conrad, D. G. Maintenance of avoidance behavior by unavoidable shocks.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1957,50, 553–557.
Staddon, J. E. R. Spaced responding and choice: A preliminary analysis.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 669–682.
Zeiler, M. D. Schedules of reinforcement: The controlling variables. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.),Handbook of operant behavior. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
Zeiler, M. D., &Solano, N. J. M. Responses and pauses: Discrimination and a choice catastrophe.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1982,37, 223–231.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sizemore, O.J., Maxwell, F.R. Differential punishment of other behavior: Effects of pause-dependent shock on variable-interval performance. Animal Learning & Behavior 11, 266–274 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199657
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199657
Keywords
- Experimental Analysis ofBehavior
- Interresponse Time
- Barpress Rate
- Shock Schedule
- Noncontingent Shock