Abstract
Pictures enhance our comprehension of written texts, but the perceptual and cognitive processes that underlie this effect have not been identified. Because integrating the information contained in a text places demands on working memory, the effect of a picture may be to expand the functional capacity of working memory and thereby to facilitate comprehension. Reasoning thus, we predicted that the availability of a diagram would interact with the difficulty of resolving anaphoric references in texts. The resolution of an anaphor distant from its antecedent (which should stress working memory) should benefit greatly from the presentation of a picture, whereas the resolution of an anaphor near to its antecedent should benefit less from the presentation of a picture. Picture availability and distance separating the anaphor from its antecedent were manipulated in experiments involving both cumulative and moving window presentations of texts. Although picture presence and ease of anaphor resolution significantly improved comprehension of the material, no evidence was found for an interaction of these factors. The results are interpreted as consistent both with dual code theory and with aspects of working memory management that do not involve anaphor resolution.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Clark, H. H., &Sengul, C. J. (1979). In search of referents for nouns and pronouns.Memory & Cognition,7, 35–41.
Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–456.
Ehrlich, K., &Rayner, K. (1983). Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: Eye movements and immediacy of processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 75–87.
Fletcher, C. R., &Bloom, C. P. (1988). Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts,Journal of Memory & Language,27, 235–244.
Garrod, S., &Sanford, A. (1990). Referential processing in reading: Focusing on roles and individuals. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores D’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.),Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 465–486). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., &Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating general comprehension skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 430–445.
Glenberg, A. M., &Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 129–151.
Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., &Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 69–83.
Gordon. P. C., Grosz, B. J., Gertner, A., & Rabin, K. (1990, November).The role of pronominal reference in discourse segment coherence. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
Halliday, M. A, K., &Hasan, R. (1976).Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Jakimik, J., &Glenberg, A. M. (1990). Verbal learning meets psycholinguistics: Modality effects in the comprehension of anaphora.Journal of Memory & Language.29, 582–590.
Just, M., Carpenter, P., &Woolley, J. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,111, 228–238.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review,95, 163–182.
Larkin, J. H., &Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words.Cognitive Science.11, 65–99.
McKoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. (1980). The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 668–682.
O’brien, E. J., Plewes, P. S., &Albrecht, J. E. (1990). Antecedent retrieval processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 241–249.
Paivio, A. (1986).Mental representation: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reder, L. M. (1979). The role of elaborations in memory for prose.Cognitive Psychology,11, 221–234.
Van den Broek, P., & Thurlow, R. (1990, November).Reinstatements and elaborative inferences during the reading of narratives. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society. New Orleans.
Willows, D. M., &Houghton, H. A. (1987).The psychology of illustrations: I. Basic research. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was funded by Air Force Office of Scientific Research Grant 89-0367 to A. M. G.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glenberg, A.M., Kruley, P. Pictures and anaphora: Evidence for independent processes. Memory & Cognition 20, 461–471 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199579
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199579