Abstract
Previous research has demonstrated that basic-level categories are associated with the parts of objects. Five experiments were conducted to investigate whether this correlation is caused by a psychological principle that requires basic concepts to have common parts. This hypothesis was investigated in the experiments by separating part and nonpart information in-artificial categories. Basic-level structure was measured in two ways: as the level with the highest ratio of within-category similarity to between-category similarity, and as the level with the fa8test categorization time in an object-identification task. The results revealed that basic-level structure could be found in categories that did not have parts in common. Furthermore, nonpart information, such as size, color, and texture, could both enhance the basic level and eliminate the basic-level advantage, depending on whether the nonpart information was consistent with or contradicted the part information. These results suggest that, psychologically, parts are neither necessary nor sufficient to form a basic level.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adelson, B. (1983).Constructs and phenomena common to semantically rich domains (Cognitive Science Technical Report No. 14). New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Anglin, J. M. (1977).Word, object and conceptual development. New York: Norton.
Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E., &Raven, P. H. (1973). General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology.American Anthropologist,75, 214–242.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components. A theory of image understanding.Psychological Review,94, 115–147.
Bsederman, I., &Ju, G. (1988). Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition.Cognitive Psychology,20, 38–64.
Brown, R. (1958). How shall a thing be called?Psychological Review,65, 14–21.
Brownell, H. H. (1978).Picture perception and semantic memory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
Callanan, M. A., &Markman, E. M. (1982). Principles of organization in young children’s natural language hierarchies.Child Development,53, 1093–1101.
Cantor, N., &Mischel, W. (1979). Prototypes in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 3–52). New York: Academic Press.
Dawson, V. L., Zeitz, C. M., &Wright, J. C. (1989). Expert-novice differences in person perception: Evidence of experts’ sensitivities to the organization of behavior.Social Cognition,7, 1–30.
Horton, M. S., &Markman, E. M. (1980). Developmental differences in the acquisition of basic and superordinate categories.Child Development,51, 708–719.
Jolicoeur, P., Gluck, M., &Kosslyn, S. M. (1984). Pictures and names: Making the connection.Cognitive Psychology,16, 243–275.
Markman, E. M. (1985). Why superordinate category terms can be mass nouns.Cognition,19, 31–53.
Markman, E. M. (1989).Categorization and naming in children. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Markman, E. M., Horton, M. S., &Mclanahan, A. G. (1980). Classes and collections: Principles of organization in the learning of hierarchical relations.Cognition,8, 227–241.
Marr, D. (1982).Vision. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Mccloskey, M., &Glucksberg, S. (1979). Decision processes in verifying category membership statements: Implications for models of semantic memory.Cognitive Psychology,11, 1–37.
Mervis, C. B., &Crisafi, M. A. (1982). Order of acquisition of subordinate, basic, and superordinate level categories.Child Developmen,53, 258–266.
Morris, M. W., &Murphy, G. L. (1990). Converging operations on a basic level in event taxonomies.Memory & Cognition,18, 407–418.
Murphy, G. L., &Brownell, H. H. (1985). Category differentiation in object recognition: Typicality constraints on the basic category advantage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 70–84.
Murphy, G. L., &Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence.Psychological Review,92, 289–316.
Murphy, G. L., &Smith, E. E. (1982). Basic-level superiority in picture categorization.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 1–20.
Murphy, G. L., &Wisniewski, E. J. (1989). Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: What a superordinate is good for.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 572–586.
Murphy, G. L., &Wright, J. C. (1984). Changes in conceptual structure with expertise: Differences between real-world experts and novices.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 144–155.
Rifkin, A. (1985). Evidence for a basic level in event taxonomies.Memory & Cognition,13, 538–556.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rosch, E., &Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology,7, 573–605.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W., Johnson, D.,&Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories.Cognitive Psychology,8, 382–439.
Smith, E. E., Balzano, G. J., &Walker, J. (1978). Nominal, perceptual, and semantic codes in picture categorization. In J. W. Cotton & R. L. Klatzky (Eds.),Semantic factors in cognition (pp. 137–168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., &Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions.Psychological Review,81, 214–241.
Tanaka, J. W., &Taylor, M. E. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder?Cognitive Psychology,23, 457–482.
Tversky, B., &Hemenway, K. (1983). Categories of environmental scenes.Cognitive Psychology,15, 121–149.
Tversky, B., &Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 169–193.
Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning picture descriptions: An approach to object recognition.Cognition,32, 193–254.
Wisniewski, E. J., &Murphy, G. L. (1989). Superordinate and basic category names in discourse: A textual analysis.Discourse Processes,12, 245–261.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by Grant BNS 83-15145 from the National Science Foundation and Grant MH 41704 from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphy, G.L. Parts in object concepts: Experiments with artificial categories. Memory & Cognition 19, 423–438 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199563
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199563