Abstract
In three experiments, we examined why pictures are remembered better than words on explicit memory tests like recall and recognition, whereas words produce more priming than pictures on some implicit tests, such as word-fragment and word-stem completion (e.g., completing __l__ph__nt or ele__ aselephant). One possibility is that pictures are always more accessible than words if subjects are given explicit retrieval instructions. An alternative possibility is that the properties of the retrieval cues themselves constrain the retrieval processes engaged; word fragments might induce data-driven (perceptually based) retrieval, which favors words regardless of the retrieval instructions. Experiment 1 demonstrated that words were remembered better than pictures on both the word-fragment and word-stem completion tasks under beth implicit and explicit retrieval conditions. In Experiment 2, pictures were recalled better than words with semantically related extralist cues. In Experiment 3, when semantic cues were combined with word fragments, pictures and words were recalled equally well under explicit retrieval conditions, but words were superior to pictures under implicit instructions. Thus, the inherently datalimited properties of fragmented words limit their use in accessing conceptual codes. Overall, the results indicate that retrieval operations are largely determined by properties of the retrieval cues under both implicit and explicit retrieval conditions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Blaxton, T. A. (1985).Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Bransfprd, J. D., Franks, J. J., Morris, C. D., &Stein, B. S. (1979). Some general constraints on learning and memory research. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 331–354). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 671–684.
Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 268–294.
Durso, F. T., &Johnson, M. K. (1980). The effects of orienting tasks on recognition, recall, and modality confusion of pictures and words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 416–429.
Eysenck, M. W. (1979). Depth, elaboration, and distinctiveness. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Graf, P., Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 553–568.
Intraub, J., &Nicklos, S. (1985). Levels of processing and picture memory: The physical superiority effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 284–298.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 485–508.
Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,111,306–340.
Madigan, S. (1983). Picture memory. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.),Imagery, memory and cognition: Essays in honor of Allan Paivio (pp. 65–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533.
Nelson, D. L. (1979). Remembering pictures and words: Appearance, significance, and name. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 45–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nelson, D. L. 0n press). Implicidy activated knowledge and memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.),Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Flowerree Symposium on Cognition.
Nelson, D. L., Canas, J. J., Bajo, M. T., &Keelean, P. D. (1987). Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 542–552.
Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., &McEvoy, C. L. (1977). Learning to order pictures and words: A model of sensory and semantic encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3, 485–497.
Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Paivio, A. (1983). The empirical case for dual coding. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.),Imagery, memory, and cognition: Essays in honor of Allan Paivio (pp. 307–332). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Paivio, A. (1986).Mental representation: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford.
Paivio, A., Rogers, T. B., &Smythe, P. C. (1968). Why are pictures easier to recall than words?Psychonomic Science,11, 137–138.
Potter, M. C., &Faulconer, B. A. (1975). Time to understand pictures and words.Nature,253, 437–438.
Roediger, H. L., &Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Retrieval modes produce dissociations in memory for surface information. In D. S. Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),The Ebbinghaus Centennial Conference (pp. 349–379). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roediger, H. L., &Weldon, M. S. (1987). Reversing the picture superiority effect. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Pressley (Eds.),Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 151–174). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Roediger, H. L., Weldon, M. S., &Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger 111 & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in Honor of Endel Tulving (pp. 3–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 156–163
Smith, M. C., &Magee, L. E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology. General,109, 373–392.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Squire, L. R., Shimamura, A. P., &Graf, P. (1987). Strength and duration of priming effects in normal subjects and amnesic patients.Neuropsychologia,25, 195–210.
Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., &Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 336–342.
Warren, C., &Morton, J. (1982). The effects of priming on picture recognition.British Journal of Psychology,73, 117–129.
Weldon, M. S., &Roediger, H. L. (1987). Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect.Memory & Cognition,15, 269–280.
Winnick, W. A., &Daniel, S. A. (1970). Two kinds of response priming in tachistoscopic recognitaon.Journal of Experimental Psychology,84, 74–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this article was supported in part by Grant HD15054-07 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weldon, M.S., Roediger, H.L. & Challis, B.H. The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition 17, 95–105 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199561
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199561