Abstract
This experiment addressed the effect of precue information, which may be either familiar or novel, and either relevant or irrelevant, on the solution of inductive reasoning problems. Sixty undergraduate students each completed 216 verbal inductive reasoning problems and five psychometric ability tests. The reasoning problems were equally divided among analogies, classifications, and series completions, with half of each kind of item presented in a standard, uncued format, and half presented with a precue. With respect to internal validation, it was found that for analogies and classifications, subjects take longer to process irrelevant than relevant information if the precue is familiar, but they take longer to process relevant than irrelevant information if the precue is novel. For series completions, this relation does not hold; rather, both novelty and irrelevance add time to the processing of information, with the time for irrelevance greater than that for novelty. The utility of precues for different tasks was explored, and it was found that familiar relevant precues facilitated solution of the more difficult kinds of items (classifications and series completions), but hampered solution of the easier, more automatically solved items (analogies). With respect to external validation, it was found that the nonentrenched induction tasks overlapped with psychometric tests in terms of abilities measured, that the abilities measured were fluid rather than crystallized, and that the precued (more nonentrenched) items were better measures of fluid abilities than were the uncued items.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Asimov, I. (1979). The singing bell. In I. Asimov, M. H. Greenberg, & C. G. Waugh (Eds.),The thirteen crimes of science fiction (pp. 221–237). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., &Wesman, A. G. (1973).Differential aptitude tests. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Cattell, R. B. (1971).Abilities Their structure, growth and action. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
Cattell, R. B., &Cattell, A. K. (1963).Test of g: Culture fair, Scale 3. Champmgn, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
Davidson, J. E., &Sternberg, R. J. (1984). The role of insight in intellectual gifledness.Gifted Child Quarterly,28, 58–64.
French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. B, &Price, I. (1963).Kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Horn, J. L., &Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized ability intelligences.Journal of Educational Psychology,57, 253–270.
Hunt, E. B., Frost, N., &Lunneborg, C. (1973). Individual differences in cognition: A new approach to intelligence. In G Bower (Ed),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 7, pp 87–122) New York Academic Press.
Hunt, E. B., Lunneborg, C., &Lewis, J. (1975). What does it mean to be high verbal?Cognitive Psychology,7, 194–227.
Kalmar, D., & Sternberg, R. J. (1985, November).When will the milk spoil? Everyday induction in daily life. Paper presented at the 26th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.
Marr, D. B., &Steruberg, R. J. (1986). Analogical reasoning with novel concepts: Differential attention of intellectually gifted and non-gifted children to relevant and irrelevant novel stimuli.Cognitive Development,1, 53–72.
Mulholland, T. M, Pellegrino, J. W., &Glaser, R. (1980). Components of geometric analogy solution.Cognitive Psychology,12, 252–284.
Raaheim, K. (1974).Problem solving and intelligence. Oslo, Norway. Universitetsforlaget.
Snow, R. E. (1980). Aptitude processes. In R. E. Snow, P.-A. Federico, & W. E. Montague (Eds.),Aptitude, learning, and instruction: VoL 1. Cognitive process analyses of aptitude (pp. 27–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaum.
Sternberg, R. J. (1977).Intelligence, information processing, analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Intelligence and nonentrenchment.Journal of Educational Psychology,73, 1–16.
Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Natural, unnatural, and supernatural concepts.Cognitive Psychology,14, 451–458.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985).Beyond 1Q: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., &Davidson, J. E. (1982, June). The mind of the puzzler.Psychology Today,16, 37–44.
Sternberg, R. J., &Davidson, J. E. (1983). Insight in the gifted.Educational Psychologist,18, 51–57.
Sternberg, R. J., &Gardner, M. K. (1983). Unities in inductive reasoning.Journal of Experimemal Psychology: General,112, 80–116.
Tetewsky, S. J., &Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Conceptual and lexical determinants of nonentrenched thinking.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 202–225.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this report was supporrted by Contract N0001485K0589 from the Office of Naval Research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sternberg, R.J., Gastel, J. If dancers ate their shoes: Inductive reasoning with factual and counterfactual premises. Memory & Cognition 17, 1–10 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199551
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199551