Abstract
Six experiments dealing with the effect of the surrounding framework on the perceived velocity of movement were reported. Experiment 1 reproduced Brown’s 11931) transposition of velocity effect. Experiment 2 demonstrated the application of relational determination to the explanation of speed constancy. Experiment 3 showed that the relational effect is independent of the perceived sizes and perceived distances of the frameworks of movement. Only relative retinal size need be considered. Experiment 4 showed that relational factors can generate large deviations from speed constancy. Experiments 5 and 6 showed that only the immediately proximate frame needs to be taken into account in assessing effects on velocity. Despite the successes of the hypothesis of relational determination, it was argued that two factors are needed to explain perceived velocity: relative object-relative displacement accounting for perceived relative velocity, and a distance calibration mechanism explaining perceived absolute velocity.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baown, J. F. The visual perception of velocity. PsychologischeForschung, 1931,14, 199–232.
Cohen, R. L.Problems in motion perception. Uppsala: Appelbergs, 1964.
Duncker, K. Über induzierte Bewegung.Psychologische Forschung, 1929,12, 180–259.
Gibson, J. J.The perception of the visual world. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1950.
Gibson, J. J.The senses considered as perceptual systems. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1966.
Gogel, W. C. The adjacency principle and three-dimensional illusions.Psychonomic Monograph Supplement, 1970,3 (Whole No. 45).
Gogel, W. C. The metric of visual space. In W. Epstein (Ed.),Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes. New York: Wiley-lnterscience, 1977.
Hochberg, J. E.Perceptton (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1978.
Rock, I.An introductton to perceptton. New YorkMacmillan, 1975.
Rock, I., Hill, A., &Fineman, M. Speed constancy as a function of size constancy.Perceptton& Psychophysics. 1968,4, 37–40.
Wallach, H. On constancy of visual speed.Psychologtcal Revtew, 1939,46, 541–442.
Wallach, H. Perception of motion.Scientific American, 1959,201, 56–60.
Wist, E. R., Diener, H. C., &Dichgans, J. Motion constancy dependent upon perceived distance and the spatial frequency of the stimulus pattern.Perception & Psychophysics. 1976,19, 485–491.
Wist, E. R., Diener, H. C., Dichgans, J., &Brandt, T. Perceived distance and the perceived speed of self-motion: Ltnear vs. angular velocity.Perceptton & Psychophysics, 1975,17, 549–554.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by NIMH Research Grant 5RO1 MH 26703.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Epstein, W. Two factors in the perception of velocity at a distance. Perception & Psychophysics 24, 105–114 (1978). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199536
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199536