Abstract
Distortions in perceptual judgments have been attributed to the axes of bilateral symmetry of surrounding figures. In the figures used in prior investigations, the axes of bilateral symmetry have been confounded with loci where heightened neural interaction might be expected to occur. In the present experiment, subjects reproduced dots surrounded by figures for which the axes of symmetry and loci of hypothesized neural interactions differed. The observed displacements supported the hypothesis that distortions were due to spreading neural effects of the surrounding figures rather than to the effects of axes of bilateral symmetry.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference Notes
1. Psotka, J.Perceptual processes that create stick figures and balance. Unpublished manuscript: University of Waterloo, 1977.
References
Andrews, D. P. Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea. Part II: Spatial integration.Vision Research, 1967,7, 999–1013.
Andrews, D. P., Butcher, A. K., &Buckley, B. R. Acuities for spatial arrangement in line figures: Human and ideal observers compared.Vision Research, 1973,13, 599–620.
Andrews, D. P., Webb, J. M., &Miller, D. T. Acuity for length comparison in continuous and broken lines.Vision Research, 1974,14, 757–766.
Attneave, F. Perception of place in a circular field.American Journal of Psychology, 1955,68, 69–82.
Beh, H. C., &Wenderoth, P. M. The effect of variation of frame shape on the angular function of the rod-and-frame illusion.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11, 35–37.
Beh, H. C., Wenderoth, P. M., &Purcell, A. T. The angular function of the rod-and-frame illusion.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,9, 353–355.
Blum, H. Biological shape and visual science (Part 1).Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1973,38, 205–287.
Brigell, M., Uhlarik, J., &Goldhorn, P. Contextual influences on judgments of linear extent.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 105–118.
Carr, W. J., &Garner, W. R. The maximum precision of reading fine scales.Journal of Psychology, 1952,34, 85–94.
Chapanis, A., &LEYZOREK, M. Accuracy of visual interpolation between scale markers as a function of the number assigned to the scale interval.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1950,40, 655–667.
Clavadetscher, J. E., &Anderson, N. H. Comparative judgment: Tests of two theories using the Baldwin figure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977,3, 119–135.
Deutsch, J. A. Neurophysiological contrast phenomena and figural aftereffects.Psychological Review, 1964,71, 19–26.
Ganz, L. Mechanism of the figural aftereffects.Psychological Review, 1966,73, 128–150.
Lederman, S. J., &Taylor, M. M. Perception of interpolated position and orientation by vision and active touch.Perception & Psychophysics, 1969,6, 153–159.
Levett, C. M., Jr. Errors of interpolation in instrument reading and setting.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1952,36, 49–52.
Miller, H. K., Jr. An exploratory study of linear interpolation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1950,34, 367–370.
Nash, H. The judgment of linear proportions.American Journal of Psychology, 1964,77, 480–484.
Robinson, J. O.The psychology of visual illusion. London: Hutchinson, 1972.
Taylor, M. M. Effect of anchoring and distance perception on the reproduction of forms.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1961,12, 203–230.
Wenderoth, P. M. The effects of tilted outline frames and intersecting line patterns on judgments of vertical.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 242–248.
Wenderoth, P. M., &Curthoys, I. On the non-additivity of visual illusions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,26, 549–555.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hartley, A.A. The major-axis effect: Axes of bilateral symmetry or loci of neural interactions?. Perception & Psychophysics 23, 537–541 (1978). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199531
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199531