Abstract
Despite the often encountered affirmation that vision completely dominates other modalities in intersensory conflict, there are cases where discordant auditorv information affects the localization of a visual signal. Experiment I shows that “auditory capture” occurs with a visual input reduced to a single luminous point in complete darkness, but not with a textured background. The task was to point at a flashing luminous point alternately in the presence of a synchronous sound coming from a source situated 15° to one side (“conflict trials,” designed to measure immediate reaction to conflict) and in its absence (“test trials,” to measure aftereffects). Adaptive immédiate reactions and aftereffects were observed in the dark, but not with a textured background. In Experiment II, on the other hand, “visual capture” of auditory localization was observed at the levels of both measures in the dark and with the textured background. That visual texture affects the degree of auditory capture of vision, but not the degree of visual capture of audition was confirmed at the level of aftereffects in Experiment III, where bisensory monitoring was substituted for pointing during exposure to conflict. The empirical finding eliminates apparent contradictions in the literature on ventriloquism, but cannot itself be explained in terms either of relative accuracy of visual and auditory localization or attentional adjustments.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bertelson, P., &Radeau, M. Ventriloquism, sensory interaction, and response bias: Remarks on the paper by Choe, Welch.Gilford, and Juola. Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 531–535.
Canon, L. K. Intermodality inconsistency of input and directed attention as determinants of the nature of adaptation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,84, 141–147.
Canon, L. K. Directed attention and maladaptive “adaptation” to displacement of the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,88, 403–408.
Choe, C. S., Welch, R. B., Gilford, R. M., &Juola, J. F. The “ventriloquist effect:” Visual dominance or response bias?Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 55–60.
Howard, I. P., &Templeton, W. B.Human spatial orientation. London: Wiley, 1966.
Jack, C. E., &Thurlow, W. R. Effects of degree of visual association and angle of displacement on the “ventriloquism” effect.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1973,37, 967–979.
Jackson, C. V. Visual factors in auditory localisation.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953,5, 52–65.
Kaufman, L.Sight and mind, an introduction to visual perception. New York: Oxford University Press, 1974.
Kalil, R. E., &Freedman, S. J. Compensation for auditory rearrangement in absence of observer movement.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967,24, 475–478.
Kelso, J. A. S., Cook, E., Olson, M. E., &Epstein, W. Allocation of attention and the locus of adaptation to displaced vision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,1, 237–245.
Matin, L. Eye movements and perceived visual direction. In D. Jameson & L. M. Hurvich (Eds.).Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. V1I/4), Visual Psychophysics. Berlin: Springer, 1972.
Pick, H. L., Jr.,Warren, D. H., &Hay, J. C. Sensory conflict in judgments of spatial direction.Perception & Psychophysics, 1969,6, 203–205.
Platt, B. B., &Warren, D. H. Auditory localization: The importance of eye movements and a textured visual environment.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 245–248.
Radeau, M. Adaptation au déplacement de l’espace visuel: Contribution expérimentale. Unpublished dissertation. Université libre de Bruxelles, 1973. (a)
Radeau, M. The locus of adaptation to auditory-visual conflict.Perception, 1973,2, 327–332. (b)
Radeau, M. Adaptation au déplacement prismatique sur la base d’une discordance entre la vision et l’audition.Année Psychologique, 1974,74, 23–34.
Radeau, M., &Bertelson, P. Adaptation à un déplacement prismatique sur la base de stimulations exafférentes en conflit.Psychologica Belgica, 1969,9, 133–140.
Radeau, M., &Bertelson, P. The aftereffects of ventriloquism.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,26, 63–71.
Rock, I., &Harris, C. S. Vision and touch.Scientific American, 1967,216, 96–104.
Stratton, G. M. Vision without inversion of the retinal image.Psychological Review, 1897,4, 341–360, 363-481.
Thomas, G. J. Experimental study of the influence of vision on sound localization.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1941,28, 167–177.
Thurlow, W. R. G., &Jack, C. E. Certain determinants of the “ventriloquism effect.”Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1973,36, 1171–1184.
Walker, J. Natural visual capture in bilateral length comparisons.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11, 247–251.
Warren, D. H. Intermodality interaction in spatial localization.Cognitive Psychology, 1970,1, 114–133.
Weerts, T. C. &Thurlow, W. R. The effect of eye position and expectation on sound localization.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,9, 35–39.
Welch, R. B. Research on adaptation to rearranged vision: 1966–1974.Perception, 1974,3, 367–392.
Willey, C. F., Inglis, E., &Pearce, C. H. Reversal of auditory localization.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1937,20. 114–130.
Witkin, H. A., Wapner, S., &Leventhal, T. Sound localization with conflicting visual and auditory cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952,43, 58–67.
Young, P. T. Auditory localization with acoustical transposition ot the ears.Journal of the Experimental Psychology, 1928,11, 399–429.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was carried out while the first author held a grant from the Belgian “Fonds national de la Recherche scientifique.” The results were presented at the meetings of the Experimental Psychology Society in Bristol (April 1974) and at the 15th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society in Boston (November 1974). The authors’ address is Laboratoire de Psychologie expérimentale, 117, av. Adolphe Buyl, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radeau, M., Bertelson, P. The effect of a textured visual field on modality dominance in a ventriloquism situation. Perception & Psychophysics 20, 227–235 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199448
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199448