Abstract
When two initially unrelated stimuli are associated with the same event (e.g., many-to-one conditional discriminations), an emergent relation can develop between those stimuli, allowing them to be interchangeable in other contexts. The source of the emergent relation appears to be a common representation of the two stimuli, and the nature of the representation may be retrospective, involving one of the initial stimuli (probably the stimulus that first enters into association). These emergent relations have been implicated in the establishment of stimulus equivalent relations. However, the failure to find strong evidence for other emergent relations thought to be involved in stimulus equivalence (Sidman, 1990; e.g., bidirectional associations, transitive relations, and functional equivalence associated with one-to-many conditional discriminations) suggests that the mechanisms underlying the emergent relations found using transfer designs following many-to-one training are different from those presumed to underlie stimulus equivalence. On the other hand, evidence for the common representation of stimuli associated with the same arbitrary event extends the nature of those representations beyond those well-established effects found when the common events are biologically important (e.g., the differential outcomes effect).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bonardi, C.,&Hall, G. (1994). Occasion setting renders stimuli more similar: Acquired equivalence between the targets of feature positive discriminations.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47B, 63–81.
Bonardi, C., Rey, V., Richmond, M.,&Hall, G. (1993). Acquired equivalence of cues in pigeon autoshaping: Effects of training with common consequences and with common antecedents.Animal Learning & Behavior,21, 369–376.
Cole, R. P., Barnet, R. C.,&Miller, R. R. (1995). Temporal encoding in trace conditioning.Animal Learning & Behavior,23, 144–153.
Colwill, R. M. (1984). Disruption of short-term memory for reinforcement by ambient illumination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36B, 235–258.
Edwards, C. A., Jagielo, J. A., Zentall, T. R.,&Hogan, D. E. (1982). Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness in matching-to-sample by pigeons: Mediation by reinforcer-specific expectancies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,8, 244–259.
Egger, M. D.,&Miller, N. E. (1962). Secondary reinforcement in rats as a function of information value and reliability of the stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology,64, 97–104.
Farthing, G. W., Wagner, J. W., Gilmour, S.,&Waxman, H. M. (1977). Short-term memory and information processing in pigeons.Learning & Motivation,8, 520–532.
Garcia, J.,&Koelling, R. A. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning.Psychonomic Science,4, 123–124.
Grant, D. S. (1982). Prospective versus retrospective coding of samples of stimuli, responses, and reinforcers in delayed matching-to-sample by pigeons.Learning & Motivation,13, 265–280.
Grant, D. S. (1991). Symmetrical and asymmetrical coding of food and no-food samples in delayed matching in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,17, 186–193.
Gray, L. (1966). Backward association in pigeons.Psychonomic Science,4, 333–334.
Guthrie, E. R. (1935).The psychology of learning. New York: Harper.
Hall, G. (1991).Perceptual and associative learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hall, G. (1996). Learning about associatively activated stimulus representations: Implications for acquired equivalence and perceptual learning.Animal Learning & Behavior,24, 233–255.
Hall, G., Ray, E.,&Bonardi, C. (1993). Acquired equivalence between cues trained with a common antecedent.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,19, 391–399.
Hearst, E. (1989). Backward associations: Differential learning about stimuli that follow the presence versus the absence of food in pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior,17, 280–290.
Hogan, D. E.,&Zentall, T. R. (1977). Backward associative learning in the pigeon.American Journal of Psychology,90, 3–15.
Honey, R. C.,&Hall, G. (1989). The acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,15, 338–346.
Hull, C. L. (1939). The problem of stimulus equivalence in behavior theory.Psychological Review,46, 9–30.
Jenkins, J. J. (1963). Mediated associations: Paradigms and situations. In C. N. Cofer & B. S. Musgrave (Eds.),Verbal behavior and learning: Problems and processes (pp. 210–245). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kaiser, D. H., Sherburne, L. M., Steirn, J. N.,&Zentall, T. R. (1997). Perceptual learning in pigeons: Decreased ability to discriminate samples mapped onto the same comparison in many-to-one matching.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 378–381.
Kjeldergaard, P. M. (1963). Transfer and mediation in verbal learning. In T. R. Dixon & D. L. Horton (Eds.),Verbal behavior and general behavior theory (pp. 67–96). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kuno, H., Kitadate, T.,&Iwamoto, T. (1994). Formation of transitivity in conditional matching to sample by pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,62, 399–408.
Lea, S. E. G. (1984). In what sense do pigeons learn concepts? In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition (pp. 263–276). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lipkens, R., Kop, P. F.,&Matthijs, W. (1986). A test of symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performance of pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,49, 395–410.
Matzel, L. D., Held, F. P.,&Miller, R. R. (1988). Information and the expression of simultaneous and backward associations: Implications for contiguity theory.Learning & Motivation,19, 317–344.
Nakagawa, E. (1986). Overtraining, extinction, and shift learning in a concurrent discrimination in rats.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,38, 313–326.
Pavlov, I. P. (1927).Conditioned reflexes (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
Peterson, G. B. (1984). How expectancies guide behavior. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition (pp. 135–148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rescorla, R. A. (1980).Pavlovian second-order conditioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rescorla, R. A., &Durlach, P. J. (1981). Within-event learning in Pavlovian conditioning. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.),Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 81–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Richards, R. W. (1988). The question of bidirectional associations in pigeons’ learning of conditional discrimination tasks.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,26, 577–579.
Rodewald, H. K. (1974). Symbolic matching-to-sample by pigeons.Psychological Reports,34, 987–990.
Saunders, K. J. (1996). Derived stimulus control: Are there differences among procedures and processes? In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.),Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 93–109). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Saunders, R. R., Wachter, J.,&Spradlin, J. E. (1988). Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,49, 95–115.
Schusterman, R. J.,&Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus Californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations.Psychological Record,43, 823–839.
Seidel, R. J. (1959). A review of sensory preconditioning.Psychological Bulletin,56, 58–73.
Seligman, M. E. P., &Hager, J. L. (Eds.) (1972).Biological boundaries of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Sherburne, L. M.,&Zentall, T. R. (1993a). Asymmetrical coding of food and no-food events by pigeons: Sample pecking versus food as the basis of the sample code.Learning & Motivation,24, 141–155.
Sherburne, L. M.,&Zentall, T. R. (1993b). Coding of feature and no-feature events by pigeons performing a delayed conditional discrimination.Animal Learning & Behavior,21, 92–100.
Sherburne, L. M.,&Zentall, T. R. (1995). Delayed matching in pigeons with food and no-food samples: Further examination of backward associations.Animal Learning & Behavior,23, 177–181.
Sherburne, L. M.,&Zentall, T. R. (1998). The differential outcomes effect in pigeons is not reduced by eliminating response-outcome associations: Support for a two-process account.Animal Learning & Behavior,26, 378–387.
Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences.Journal of Hearing & Speech Research,14, 5–13.
Sidman, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In H. Lejeune & D. Blackman (Eds.),Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W.,&Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discrimination of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,37, 23–44.
Sidman, M.,&Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching-to-sample: An expansion of the testing program.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,37, 5–22.
Skinner, B. F. (1938).The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century.
Spear, N. E., Kraemer, P. J., Molina, J. C., &Smoller, D. E. (1988). Developmental change in learning and memory: Infantile disposition for unitization. In J. Delacour & J. C. S. Levy (Eds.),Systems with learning and memory abilities (pp. 27–52). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Spear, N. E., &Molina, J. C. (1987). The role of sensory modality in the ontogeny of stimulus selection. In N. Krasnegor, E. M. Blass, M. A. Hofer, & W. P. Smotherman (Eds.),Perinatal development: A psychobiological perspective (pp. 83–110). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Spetch, M. L., Wilkie, D. M.,&Pinel, J. P. J. (1981). Backward conditioning: A reevaluation of the empirical evidence.Psychological Bulletin,89, 163–175.
Spradlin, J. E., Cotter, V. W., &Baxley, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: A study of transfer with retarded adolescents.American Journal of Mental Deficiency,77, 556–566.
Spradlin, J. E.,&Saunders, R. R. (1986). The development of stimulus classes using matching-to-sample procedures: Sample classification versus comparison classification.Analysis & Intervention in Developmental Disabilities,6, 41–58.
Steirn, J. N., Jackson-Smith, P.,&Zentall, T. R. (1991). Mediational use of internal representations of food and no-food events by pigeons.Learning & Motivation,22, 353–365.
Thorndike, E. L. (1911).Animal intelligence. New York: Macmillan.
Trapold, M. A. (1970). Are expectancies based on different positive reinforcing events discriminably different?Learning & Motivation,1, 129–140.
Urcuioli, P. J. (1996). Acquired equivalences and mediated generalization in pigeon’s matching-to-sample. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.),Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 55–70). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Urcuioli, P. J., DeMarse, T.,&Zentall, T. R. (1994). Some properties of many-to-one matching with hue, response, and food samples: Retention and mediated transfer.Learning & Motivation,25, 175–200.
Urcuioli, P. J.,&Zentall, T. R. (1986). Retrospective memory in pigeons’ delayed matching-to-sample.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,12, 69–77.
Urcuioli, P. J.,&Zentall, T. R. (1993). A test of comparisonstimulus substitutability following one-to-many matching by pigeons.Psychological Record,43, 725–744.
Urcuioli, P. J., Zentall, T. R.,&DeMarse, T. (1995). Transfer to derived sample-comparison relations by pigeons following many-to-one versus one-to-many matching with identical training relations.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48B, 158–178.
Urcuioli, P. J., Zentall, T. R., Jackson-Smith, P.,&Steirn, J. N. (1989). Evidence for common coding in many-to-one matching: Retention, intertrial interference, and transfer.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,15, 264–273.
Wasserman, E. A., DeVolder, C. L.,&Coppage, D. J. (1992). Nonsimilarity based conceptualization in pigeons via secondary or mediated generalization.Psychological Science,3, 374–379.
Wasserman, E. A., Hugart, J. A.,&Kirkpatrick-Steger, K. (1995). Pigeons show same-different conceptualization after training with complex visual stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,21, 248–252.
Wilson, B.,&Boakes, R. A. (1985). A comparison of the short-term memory performance of pigeons and jackdaws.Animal Learning & Behavior,13, 285–290.
Yamamoto, J.,&Asano, T. (1995). Stimulus equivalence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).Psychological Record,45, 3–21.
Young, M. E.,&Wasserman, E. A. (1997). Entropy detection by pigeons: Response to mixed visual displays after same-different discrimination training.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,23, 157–170.
Zentall, T. R., Edwards, C. A., Moore, B. S.,&Hogan, D. E. (1981). Identity: The basis for both matching and oddity learning in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,7, 70–86.
Zentall, T. R.,&Hogan, D. E. (1974). Abstract concept learning in the pigeon.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 393–398.
Zentall, T. R.,&Hogan, D. E. (1975). Concept learning in the pigeon: Transfer of matching and nonmatching to new stimuli.American Journal of Psychology,88, 233–244.
Zentall, T. R.,&Hogan, D. E. (1976). Pigeons can learn identity, difference, or both.Science,191, 408–409.
Zentall, T. R.,&Hogan, D. E. (1978). Same/different concept learning in the pigeon: The effect of negative instances and prior adaptation to the transfer stimuli.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,30, 177–186.
Zentall, T. R., Jagielo, J. A., Jackson-Smith, P.,&Urcuioli, P. J. (1987). Memory codes in pigeon short-term memory: Effect of varying number of sample and comparison stimuli.Learning & Motivation,18, 21–33.
Zentall, T. R., Sherburne, L. M.,&Steirn, J. N. (1992). Development of excitatory backward associations during the establishment of forward associations in a delayed conditional discrimination by pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior,20, 199–206.
Zentall, T. R., Sherburne, L. M.,&Urcuioli, P. J. (1993). Common coding by pigeons in a many-to-one delayed matching task as evidenced by facilitation and interference effects.Animal Learning & Behavior,21, 233–237.
Zentall, T. R., Sherburne, L. M.,&Urcuioli, P. J. (1995). Coding of hedonic and nonhedonic samples by pigeons in many-to-one delayed matching.Animal Learning & Behavior,23, 189–196.
Zentall, T. R., Steirn, J. N., Sherburne, L. M.,&Urcuioli, P. J. (1991). Common coding in pigeons assessed through partial versus total reversals of many-to-one conditional and simple discriminations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,17, 194–201.
Zentall, T. R., Urcuioli, P. J., Jagielo, J. A.,&Jackson-Smith, P. (1989). Interaction of sample dimension and sample-comparison mapping on pigeons’ performance of delayed conditional discriminations.Animal Learning & Behavior,17, 172–178.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research described in this article was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grants MH 35376 and MH 45979 and by National Science Foundation Grants BNS 8418275, RII 8902792, BNS 9019080, and IBN 9414589. Important contributions to the research presented here were provided by David E. Hogan, Charles A. Edwards, Joyce A. Jagielo, Pamela Jackson-Smith, Janice N. Steirn, Lou M. Sherburne, Karen L. Roper, Daren H. Kaiser, Tom DeMarse, and especially Peter J. Urcuioli.
Note: This article is one of those occasionally invited by the editor in which authors have the opportunity to provide a overview of their research programs.—Editor
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zentall, T.R. Symbolic representation in animals: Emergent stimulus relations in conditional discrimination learning. Animal Learning & Behavior 26, 363–377 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199229
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199229