Abstract
Rhesus monkeys learned to perform two-object random figure discrimination problems by touch. This performance was compared to the visual acquisition of the same problems (reported earlier). In both modalities, choice latencies were shorter to the correct than to the incorrect figure. As compared to visual, however, tactual learning required significantly more trials to criterion, was independent of stimulus figure complexity, and was characterized by significantly shorter choice latencies. Rotation of the figures 180 deg after criterion performance was achieved, yielded partial recognition of the figures visually, but no recognition tactually. These results are explained by different observational or cue-utilization strategies. The majority of the figure is inspected visually, but only the same small section of the perimeter is used tactually. Thus, restricted use of the available cues characterizes tactual performance and is responsible for generating differences in various measures of learning between vision and touch in the monkey.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Attneave, F., & Arnoult, M. The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. Psychological Bulletin, 1956, 53, 452–471.
Brown, D., Hitchcock, L., & Michels, K. Quantitative studies in form perception: An evaluation of the role of selected stimulus parameters in the visual discrimination performance of human subjects. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1962, 14, 519–529.
Carlson, K. A temporary restraint chair for monkeys. Physiology & Behavior, 1972, 9, 493–494.
Carlson, K. Visual discrimination learning of random figure problems by rhesus monkeys. Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973, 1, 33–37.
Crook, M. Facsimile-generated analogues for instrumental displays. In J. Wulfeck & J. Taylor (Eds.),Form discrimination as related to military problems. Washington, D.C.: NAS-NRC, 1957, Pp. 85–98.
Feldman, R. The specificity of the fixated response in the rat. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 1953, 46, 487–492.
Frampton, G., Milner, A., & Ettlinger, G. Cross-modal transfer between vision and touch of go, no-go discrimination learning in the monkey. Neuropsychologia, 1973, 11, 231–233.
Goodnow, J. Eye and hand: Differential sampling of form and orientation properties. Neuxopsychologia, 1969, 7, 365–373.
Hicks, L. Effects of stimulus rotation on discrimination learning by monkeys. Psychonomic Science, 1967, 9, 57–58.
Mahut, H. The effect of stimulus position on visual discrimination by the rat. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1954, 8, 130–138.
Manzoni, T., & Ettlinger, G. Impairment of tactile discrimination performance in monkeys with tectal damage. Neuropsychologia, 1971, 9, 289–292.
Milner, A., & Ettlinger, G. Response latencies in go, no-go discrimination performance by monkeys. Neuropsychologia, 1972, 10, 375–378.
Oscar, M., & Wilson, M. Tactual and visual discrimination learning in monkeys with frontal lesions. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 1966, 62, 108–114.
Owen, D., & Brown, D. Visual and tactual form complexity: A Psychophysical approach to perceptual equivalence. Perception & Psychophysics, 1970a, 7, 225–228.
Owen, D., & Brown, D. Visual and tactual form discrimination: Psychophysical comparison within and between modalities. Perception & Psychophysics, 1970b, 7, 302–306.
Passingham, R., & Ettlinger, G. Tactile discrimination learning after selective prefrontal ablations in monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Neuropsychologia, 1972, 10, 17–26.
Stamm, J., & Rosen, S. Learning on somesthetic discrimination and reversal tasks by monkeys with epileptogenic implants in anteromedial temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 1971, 9, 185–194.
Wilson, M. Tactual discrimination learning in monkeys. Neuropsychologia, 1965, 3, 353–361.
Zusne, L.Visual perception of form. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant MH 20121 from the National Institute of Mental Health to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carlson, K.R., Eibergen, R. Factors influencing the acquisition of tactual random figure discriminations by rhesus monkeys. Animal Learning & Behavior 2, 133–137 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199139
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199139