Hungry rats were used in a classical conditioning procedure in which visual stimuli were paired with food. Conditions in which nonreinforced exposure to a nontarget stimulus was followed by exposure to a simultaneous compound nontarget/target stimulus (a blocking procedure) resulted in enhanced latent inhibition to the target relative to exposure to the nontarget, followed by exposure to the target stimulus alone. A third phase of nonreinforced exposure training, in which the target was exposed alone following the compound, reduced levels of latent inhibition relative to results obtained with the blocking procedure. Experiments also suggested that this was not the result of restoration of associability by the omission of an expected presentation of the nontarget stimulus in the final preexposure phase. These results suggest that enhanced latent inhibition is due to summation of a direct-target-no-event association and a second-order association of these elements via target-nontarget and nontarget-no-event association. Exposure to the target after compound exposure extinguished the target-nontarget association and reduced the sources of no-event learning for the target.
Baker, A. G., Haskins, C. E., &Hall, G. (1990). Stimulus generalization decrement in latent inhibition to a compound following exposure to the elements or the compound.Animal Learning & Behavior,18, 162–170.
Hall, G., &Channel, S. (1985). Differential effects of context change on latent inhibition and on the habituation of an orienting response.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,11, 470–481.
Hall, G., &Honey, R. C. (1989). Perceptual and associative learning. In S. B. Klein & R. R. Mowrer (Eds.),Contemporary learning theories (pp. 117–147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hall, G., Kaye, H., &Pearce, J. M. (1985). Attention and conditioned inhibition. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.),Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 185–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hall, G., &Pearce, J. M. (1982). Restoring the associability of a pre-exposed CS by a surprising event.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,34B, 127–140.
Holland, P. C. (1980). Second-order conditioning with and without unconditioned stimulus presentations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,6, 238–250.
Honey, R. C., &Hall, G. (1988). Overshadowing and blocking procedures in latent inhibition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40B, 163–186.
Honey, R. C., &Hall, G. (1989). Attenuation of latent inhibition after compound pre-exposure: Associative and perceptual explanations.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41B, 355–368.
Reed, P. (1995a). Compound stimulus pre-exposure effects in an appetitive conditioning procedure.Learning & Motivation,26, 1–10.
Reed, P. (1995b). Enhanced latent inhibition following compound pre-exposure.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48B, 32–45.
Reed, P.,Anderson, E.,Bucknell, V., &Foster, C. (1996).The influence of type of stimulus on the enhanced latent inhibition effect. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Rescorla, R. A., &Colwill, R. M. (1983). Within-compound associations in unblocking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,9, 390–400.
Rudy, J.W., Krauter, E. E., &Gaffuri, A. (1976). Attenuation of the latent inhibition effect by prior exposure to another stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,2, 235–247.
Siddle, D. A., Booth, M. L., &Packer, J. S. (1987). Effects of stimulus preexposure on omission responding and omission-produced dishabituation of the human electrodermal response.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39B, 339–363.
Speers, M. A., Gillan, D. J., &Rescorla, R. A. (1980). Within compound associations in a variety of compound conditioning procedures.Learning & Motivation,11, 135–149.
Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.),Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
These data were presented at the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour Group Meeting, London, 1996. Thanks are extended to Geof Hall, Tony Dickinson, Celia Heyes, and Chris Mitchell for helpful criticism of this research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reed, P., Petrochilos, P., Upal, N. et al. Extinction of enhanced latent inhibition. Animal Learning & Behavior 25, 283–290 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199086
- Conditioned Stimulus
- Target Stimulus
- Latent Inhibition
- Compound Stimulus
- Target Conditioned Stimulus