Abstract
Three experiments investigated the effect of contextual and trial stimulus lighting conditions on keypeck autoshaping in pigeons. White illumination of a response key before food presentation readily produced keypecking in a brightly lit chamber but failed to do so in a chamber without house illumination (Experiments I and III). Keypecking in a darkened cubicle progressively increased and the facilitatory effect of a houselight decreased as the keylight stimulus was varied from a color change (Experiment II) to a feature change (Experiment III). These findings support a “cue localization” hypothesis of autoshaping. according to which reinforcement signals select specific behaviors for expression and direct these behaviors toward the source of stimulation. This account was extended to superstitious and operant conditioning situations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bindra, D The interrelated mechanisms of reinforcement and motivation and the nature of their influence on responseNebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln University Press. 1969 Pp 1–33
Birch, H. G. & Bitterman, M. E. Reinforcement and learning The process of senson integration Psycholosical Review, 1949, 56, 292–308.
Breland, K., & Breland, M.Animal behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1966.
Brown, P. L., & Jenkins, H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon’s key-peck. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968, 11, 1–8.
Culler, E. Recent advances in some concepts of conditioning. Psychological Review, 1938, 45, 134–153.
Dunham, P. J., Mariner, A., & Adams, H. Enhancement of off-key pecking by on-key punishment. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969, 12, 789–797.
Engberg, L. A., Hansen, G., Welker, R. L., & Thomas, D. R. Acquisition of key-pecking via autoshaping as a function of prior experience: “Learned laziness”? Science, 1972, 178, 1002–1004.
Farthing, G. W. Effect of a signal previously paired with free food on operant response rate in pigeons. Psychonomic Science, 1971, 23, 343–344.
Gamzu, E., & Williams, D. R. Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal response. Science, 1971, 171, 923–925.
Gamzu, E., & Williams, D. R. Associative factors underlying the pigeon’s key pecking in auto-shaping procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973, 19, 225–232.
Gardner, W. M. Auto-shaping in bobwhite quail. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969, 12, 279–281.
Gardner, W. M. An analysis of auto-shaping. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Louisville, 1970.
Gardner, W. M., Belson, J. L., & Smith, L. P. Dot appearance vs dot disappearance as a trial stimulus in auto-maintenance: A test for relative connectability. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Atlanta, 1972.
Hefferline, R. F., Bruno, L. J. J., & Davidowitz, J. E. Feedback control of covert behaviour. In K. J. Connolly (Ed.),Mechanisms of motor skill development. London: Academic Press, 1971. Pp. 245–278.
Herrnstein, R. J. Superstition: A corollary of the principles of operant conditioning. In W. K. Honig (Ed.),Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966. Pp. 33–51.
Hitzing, E. W., & Safar, T. Auto-shaping: The conditions necessary for its development and maintenance. Psychological Record, 1970, 20, 347–351.
Moore, B. R. On directed respondents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1971.
Pavlov, I. P. An attempt at a physiological interpretation of obsessional neurosis and paranoia. Journal of Mental Science, 1934, 80, 187–197. (Reprinted inConditioned reflexes and psychiatry. New York: New World Paperbacks, 1964.)
Ricci, J. A. Key pecking under response-independent food presentation after long simple and compound stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973, 19, 509–516.
Sidman, M.Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books, 1960.
Skinner, B. F.The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1938.
Skinner, B. F. “Superstition” in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1948, 38, 168–172.
Skinner, B. F. Auto-shaping. Science, 1971, 173, 752.
Smith, S. G., & Wilkes, W. P. An automatic method for obtaining magazine approach behavior and key pecking in pigeon. Psychological Record, 1971, 21, 373–375.
Staddon, J. E. R., & Simmelhag, V. L. The “superstition” experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 1971, 78, 3–43.
Terrace, H. S. Stimulus control. In W. K. Honig (Ed.),Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966. Pp. 271–344.
Thomas, D. R., Ernst, A. J., & Andry, D. K. More on masking of stimulus control during generalization testing. Psychonomic Science, 1971, 23, 85–86.
Wagner, A. R. Stimulus validity and stimulus selection in associative learning. In N. J. Mackintosh and W. K. Honig (Eds.),Fundamental issues in associative learning. Halifax: Dalhousie University Press, 1969. Pp. 90–122.
Wasserman, E. A. Auto-shaping: The selection and direction of behavior by predictive stimuli. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1972.
Wasserman, E. A. Selective discrimination learning in pigeons. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, 1973.
Wasserman, E. A. Pavlovian conditioning with heat reinforcement produces stimulus-directed pecking in chicks. Science, in press.
Wasserman, E. A., Franklin, S. R., & Hearst, E. Pavlovian appetitive contingencies and approach vs withdrawal to conditioned stimuli in pigeons. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, in press.
Williams, D. R., & Williams, H. Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: Sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969, 12, 511–520.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This report is based upon a portion of a dissertation submitted to Indiana University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD degree.
This research was supported by a National Institute of Mental Health Predoctoral Fellowship (1 F01 MH 49580) to the author and by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH 19300) to Eliot Hearst.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wasserman, E.A. The effect of redundant contextual stimuli on autoshaping the pigeon’s keypeck. Animal Learning & Behavior 1, 198–206 (1973). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199074
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199074