Abstract
Two experiments examined within-session changes in responding during discrimination procedures. In Experiment 1, rate of responding changed significantly within sessions during symbolic delayed matching-to-sample tasks when the delay between the stimulus and the choice period was short (1–5 sec), but not when it was long (8–12 sec). The percentage of responses that were correct did not change within sessions. In Experiment 2, response rates increased and then decreased within sessions during both S1 and S2 when successive discrimination procedures provided high, but not low, rates of reinforcement. Discrimination ratios sometimes increased within sessions. These results question two potential definitions of attention as explanations for within-session changes in response rates. They are more compatible with explanations based on concepts such as arousal, satiation, habituation, and interfering responses.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bindra, D. (1959). Stimulus change, reactions to novelty and response decrement.Psychological Review,66, 96–103.
Bitterman, M. E. (1960). Toward a comparative psychology of learning.American Psychologist,15, 704–712.
Bitterman, M. E. (1965). Phyletic differences in learning.American Psychologist,20, 396–410.
Cannon, C. B., &McSweeney, F. K. (1995). Within-session changes in responding when rate and duration of reinforcement vary.Behavioural Processes,34, 285–292.
DeLong, R. E., &Wasserman, E. A. (1981). Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching-to-sample performance in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,7, 394–412.
Edhouse, W. V., &White, K. G. (1988). Cumulative proactive interference in animal memory.Animal Learning & Behavior,16, 461–467.
Feldman, M. P. (1963). A reconsideration of the extinction hypothesis of warm up in motor behavior.Psychological Bulletin,60, 452–459.
Fleshler, M., &Hoffman, H. S. (1962). A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,5, 529–530.
Glanzer, M. (1958). Curiosity, exploratory drive and stimulus satiation.Psychological Bulletin,55, 302–315.
Groves, P. M., &Thompson, R. F. (1970). Habituation: A dual process theory.Psychological Review,77, 419–450.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,13, 243–266.
Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H., &Cable, C. (1976). Natural concepts in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,2, 285–302.
Hodos, W., &Bonbright, J. C., Jr. (1972). The detection of visual intensity differences by pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,18, 471–479.
Killeen, P. R., Hanson, S. J., &Osborne, S. R. (1978). Arousal: Its genesis and manifestation as response rate.Psychological Review,85, 571–581.
McCarthy, D., &Voss, P. (1995). Delayed matching-to-sample performance: Effects of relative reinforcer frequency and of signaled versus unsignaled reinforcer magnitudes.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,63, 33–51.
McSweeney, F. K. (1992). Rate of reinforcement and session duration as determinants of within-session patterns of responding.Animal Learning & Behavior,20, 160–169.
McSweeney, F. K., Hatfield, J., &Allen, T. M. (1990). Withinsession responding as a function of post-session feedings.Behavioural Processes,22, 177–186.
McSweeney, F. K., &Hinson, J. M. (1992). Patterns of responding within sessions.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,58, 19–36.
McSweeney, F. K., &Johnson, K. S. (1994). The effect of time between sessions on within-session patterns of responding.Behavioural Processes,31, 207–218.
McSweeney, F. K., &Roll, J. M. (1993). Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,60, 621–640.
McSweeney, F. K., Roll, J. M., &Weatherly, J. N. (1994). Withinsession changes in responding during several simple schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,62, 109–132.
Nevin, J. A., &Grosch, J. (1990). Effects of signaled reinforcer magnitude on delayed matching-to-sample performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,16, 298–305.
Papini, M. R., &Overmier, J. B. (1985). Partial reinforcement and autoshaping of the pigeon’s key-peck behavior.Learning & Motivation,16, 109–123.
Pavlov, I. P. (1928).Lectures on conditioned ref lexes (W. H. Gantt, Trans.). New York: International Publishers.
Reese, T. W., &Hogenson, M. J. (1962). Food satiation in the pigeon.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,5, 239–245.
Roberts, W. A. (1972). Short-term memory in the pigeon: Effects of repetition and spacing.Journal of Experimental Psychology,94, 73–83.
Roll, J. M., McSweeney, F. K., Johnson, K. S., &Weatherly, J. N. (1995). Satiety contributes little to within-session decreases in responding.Learning & Motivation,26, 323–341.
Santi, A., &Roberts, W. A. (1985). Reinforcement expectancy and trial spacing effects in delayed matching-to-sample by pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior,13, 274–284.
Tennant, W. A., &Bitterman, M. E. (1973). Asymptotic free-operant discrimination reversal in the goldfish.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,82, 130–136.
Weatherly, J. N., McSweeney, F. K., &Swindell, S. (1995). On the contributions of responding and reinforcement to within-session patterns of responding.Learning & Motivation,26, 421–432.
Wilkie, D. M. (1986). Pigeons’ spatial memory: V. Proactive interference in the delayed matching of key location paradigm occurs only under restricted conditions.Animal Learning & Behavior,14, 257–266.
Woodard, W. T., &Bitterman, M. E. (1972). Further studies of reversal learning with singly presented stimuli in pigeons and goldfish.Psychonomic Science,28, 170–172.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This material is based on work supported by National Science Foundation Grant IBN-9403719. Some of these results were presented at the November 1994 meeting of the Psychonomic Society in St. Louis, MO.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mcsweeney, F.K., Weatherly, J.N. & Swindell, S. Within-session changes in responding during delayed matching-to-sample and discrimination procedures. Animal Learning & Behavior 24, 290–299 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198977
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198977