Abstract
The roles of deficient acquisition and deficient expression of learned information in the effect of relative stimulus validity were examined using rats in a conditioned lick suppression paradigm. Recovery from the effect without further pairings of the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US) would favor an interpretation of the relative validity effect based on a latent CS-US association as distinct from a failure to acquire the CS-US association. As a potential recovery manipulation, “reminder” treatments, consisting of the US alone (Experiment 1) or the CS alone (Experiment 2), were administered following relative validity training. In both cases, subjects for which the CS target was of low relative predictive validity exhibited enhanced responding relative to appropriate controls. Additionally, Experiment 2 showed that the amelioration of the relative validity deficit was stimulus specific. Thus, the results of these experiments support previous suggestions that the performance deficit resulting from low relative stimulus validity is due, at least in part, to a failure to express acquired information (Cole, Barnet, & Miller, 1995a).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Balaz, M. A., Gutsin, P., Cacheiro, H., &Miller, R. R. (1982). Blocking as a retrieval failure: Reactivation of associations to a blocked stimulus.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,34B, 99–113.
Barnet, R. C., Arnold, H. M., &Miller, R. R. (1991). Simultaneous conditioning demonstrated in second-order conditioning: Evidence for similar associative structure in forward and simultaneous conditioning.Learning & Motivation,22, 253–268.
Bouton, M. E. (1990). Context and retrieval in extinction and in other examples of interference in simple associative learning. In L. W. Dachowski & C. F. Flaherty (Eds.),Current topics in animal learning: Brain, emotion, and cognition (pp. 25–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning.Psychological Bulletin,114, 80–99.
Bouton, M. E., &Bolles, R. C. (1979). Role of conditioned contextual stimuli in reinstatement of extinguished fear.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,15, 43–52.
Campbell, B. A., &Jaynes, J. (1966). Reinstatement.Psychological Review,73, 478–480.
Cole, R. P., Barnet, R. C., &Miller, R. R. (1995a). Relative validity effect: Learning or performance deficit.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,21, 293–303.
Cole, R. P., Barnet, R. C., &Miller, R. R. (1995b). Temporal encoding in trace conditioning.Animal Learning & Behavior,23, 144–153.
Deweer, B., Sara, S. J., &Hars, B. (1980). Contextual cues and memory retrieval in rats: Alleviation of forgetting by pretest exposure to background stimuli.Animal Learning & Behavior,8, 265–272.
Feldman, D. T., &Gordon, W. C. (1979). The alleviation of shortterm retention decrements with reactivation.Learning & Motivation,10, 198–210.
Gibbon, J., &Balsam, P. (1981). Spreading association in time. In C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, & J. Gibbon (Eds.),Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 219–253). New York: Academic Press.
Grahame, N. J., Barnet, R. C., Gunther, L. M., &Miller, R. R. (1994). Latent inhibition as a performance deficit resulting from CS-context associations.Animal Learning & Behavior,22, 395–408.
Hawkins, R. D., &Kandel, E. R. (1984). Is there a cell-biological alphabet for simple forms of learning?Psychological Review,91, 375–391.
Hull, C. L. (1952).A behavior system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kamin, L. J. (1969). Selective association and conditioning. In N. J. Mackintosh & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Fundamental issues in associative learning (pp. 42–64). Halifax, NS: Dalhousie University Press.
Kasprow, W. J., Cacheiro, H., Balaz, M. A., &Miller, R. R. (1982). Reminder-induced recovery of associations to an overshadowed stimulus.Learning & Motivation,13, 155–166.
Kasprow, W. J., Catterson, D., Schachtman, T. R., &Miller, R. R. (1984). Attenuation of latent inhibition by post-acquisition reminder.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36B, 53–63.
Kaufman, M. A., &Bolles, R. C. (1981). A nonassociative aspect of overshadowing.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,18, 318–320.
Kraemer, P. J., Lariviere, N. A., &Spear, N. E. (1988). Expression of a taste aversion conditioned with an odor-taste compound: Overshadowing is relatively weak in weanlings and decreases over a retention interval in adults.Animal Learning & Behavior,16, 164–168.
Kraemer, P. J., Randall, C. K., &Carbary, T. J. (1991). Release from latent inhibition with delayed testing.Animal Learning & Behavior,19, 139–145.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review,82, 276–289.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1976). Overshadowing and stimulus intensity.Animal Learning & Behavior,4, 186–192.
Marr, D. (1976). Early processing of visual information.Transactions of the Royal Society of London,275B, 483–519.
Matzel, L. D., Brown, A. M., &Miller, R. R. (1987). Associative effects of US preexposure: Modulation conditioned responding by an excitatory training context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,13, 65–72.
Matzel, L. D., Held, F. P., &Miller, R. R. (1988). Information and expression of simultaneous and backward associations: Implications for contiguity theory.Learning & Motivation,19, 317–344.
Matzel, L. D., Schachtman, T. R., &Miller, R. R. (1985). Recovery of an overshadowed association achieved by extinction of the overshadowing stimulus.Learning & Motivation,16, 398–412.
Miller, J. S., Jagielo, J. A., &Spear, N. E. (1993). The influence of retention interval on the US preexposure effect: Changes in contextual blocking over time.Learning & Motivation,24, 376–394.
Miller, R. R. (1982). Effects of intertrial reinstatement of training stimuli on complex maze learning in rats: Evidence that “acquisition” curves reflect more than acquisition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,8, 86–109.
Miller, R. R., Barnet, R. C., &Grahame, N. J. (1992). Responding to a conditioned stimulus depends on current associative status of other cues present during the training of that specific stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,18, 251–264.
Miller, R. R., Kasprow, W. J., &Schachtman, T. R. (1986). Retrieval variability: Sources and consequences.American Journal of Psychology,99, 145–218.
Miller, R. R., &Matzel, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 51–92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Miller, R. R., Ott, C. A., Berk, A. M., &Springer, A. D. (1974). Appetitive memory restoration after electroconvulsive shock in the rat.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,87, 717–723.
Miller, R. R., &Schachtman, T. R. (1985). Conditioning context as an associative baseline: Implications for response generation and the nature of conditioned inhibition. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.),Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 51–88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Miller, R. R., &Springer, A. D. (1972). Induced recovery of memory in rats following electroconvulsive shock.Physiology & Behavior,8, 645–651.
Pavlov, I. P. (1927).Conditioned ref lexes (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning.Psychological Review,94, 61–73.
Pearce, J. M., &Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.Psychological Review,6, 532–552.
Rescorla, R. A. (1980).Second-order conditioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rescorla, R. A., &Heth, C. D. (1975). Reinstatement of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,1, 88–96.
Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Schachtman, T. R., Brown, A. M., &Miller, R. R. (1985). Reminderinduced recovery of a taste-LiCl association following extinction.Animal Learning & Behavior,13, 223–227.
Schachtman, T. R., Gee, J. L., Kasprow, W. J., &Miller, R. R. (1983). Reminder-induced recovery from blocking as a function of the number of compound trials.Learning & Motivation,14, 154–164.
Spear, N. E. (1973). Retrieval of memory in animals.Psychological Review,80, 163–194.
Spear, N. E. (1978).The processing of memories: Forgetting and retention. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Spear, N. E., Miller, J. S., &Jagielo, J. (1990). Animal memory and learning.Annual Review of Psychology,41, 169–211.
Thompson, R. F. (1986). The neurobiology of learning and memory.Science,233, 941–947.
Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals.Psychological Review, Monograph Supplement,2(8).
Tolman, E. C. (1932).Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Wagner, A. R. (1969a). Stimulus-selection and a “modified contiguity theory.” In G. H. Bower & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 3, pp. 1–41). New York: Academic Press.
Wagner, A. R. (1969b). Stimulus validity and stimulus selection in associative learning. In N. J. Mackintosh & W. K. Honing (Eds.),Fundamental issues in associative learning (pp. 90–122). Halifax, NS: Dalhousie University Press.
Wagner, A. R., Logan, F. A., Haberlandt, K., &Price, T. (1968). Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,76, 171–180.
Wasserman, E. A. (1974). Stimulus-reinforcer predictiveness and selective discrimination learning in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 284–297.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This conclusion is discussed as a part of the larger issue of acquisition versus performance failures. Support for this research was provided by National Institute of Mental Health Grant 33881. We thank Nicholas Grahame, Lisa Gunther, and Philippe Oberling for comments on earlier versions of this manuscript and Lee Mattes for assistance with data collection.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cole, R.P., Denniston, J.C. & Miller, R.R. Reminder-induced attenuation of the effect of relative stimulus validity. Animal Learning & Behavior 24, 256–265 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198974
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198974