Animal Learning & Behavior

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 168–174 | Cite as

Self-control in the monkeymacaca fascicularis

  • Henry Tobin
  • A. W. Logue
  • John J. Chelonis
  • Kimberly T. Ackerman
  • Jack G. May
Article

Abstract

Two experiments tested two cynomolgus monkeys’ self-control—choice of a longer, more delayed reinforcer over a shorter, less delayed reinforcer. In Experiment 1, subjects exhibited significant selfcontrol in a procedure in which reinforcer amounts and delays were held constant throughout a condition. In Experiment 2, subjects exhibited significantly greater sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount than to variation in reinforcer delay in a procedure in which the reinforcer delay associated with the self-control alternative was adjusted until each macaque was indifferent between the two alternatives. Both experiments indicated that, in laboratory paradigms in which humans show self-control and pigeons and rats show impulsiveness, macaques show self-control. These results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that species differences in self-control are a function of language ability or of specific types of prior training. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that species differences in self-control are related to the ratio of brain size to body weight (a possible indicator of general cognitive ability) or to shared phylogeny.

References

  1. Ainslie, G. W. (1974). Impulse control in pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,21, 485–489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainslie, G. W. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.Psychological Bulletin,82, 463–496.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alsop, B., &Elliffe, D. (1988). Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,49, 21–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,22, 231–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Count, E. W. (1947). Brain and body weight in man: Their antecedents in growth and evolution.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,46 (pt. 10), 995–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crile, G., &Quiring, D. P. (1940). A record of the body weight and certain organ and gland weights of 3,690 animals.Ohio Journal of Science,40, 219–259.Google Scholar
  7. Forzano, L. B., &Logue, A. W. (1994). Self-control in adult humans: Comparison of qualitatively different reinforcers.Learning & Motivation,25, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harvey, P. H., &Pagel, M. D. (1991).The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hodos, W., &Campbell, C. B. G. (1969). Scalae naturae: Why there is no theory in comparative psychology.Psychological Review,76, 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jerison, H. J. (1961, March 31). Quantitative analysis of the evolution of the brain in mammals.Science,133, 1012–1014.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jerison, H. J. (1969). Brain evolution and dinosaur brains.American Naturalist,103, 575–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jerison, H. J. (1970). Gross brain indices and the analysis of fossil endocasts. In C. R. Noback & W. Montagna (Eds.),Advances in primatology: Vol. 1. The primate brain (pp. 225–244). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  13. Jerison, H. J. (1991).Brain size and the evolution of mind: Fifty-ninth James Arthur lecture on the evolution of the human brain. New York: American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
  14. Lewontin, R. C. (1987). The shape of optimality. In J. Dupré (Ed.),The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimality (pp. 151–159). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Logue, A. W. (1988). Research on self-control: An integrating framework.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,11, 665–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Logue, A. W. (1995).Self-control: Waiting until tomorrow for what you want today. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Logue, A. W., &Chavarro, A. (1992). Self-control and impulsiveness in preschool children.Psychological Record,42, 189–204.Google Scholar
  18. Logue, A. W., Forzano, L. B., &Tobin, H. (1992). Independence of reinforcer amount and delay: The generalized matching law and self-control in humans.Learning & Motivation,23, 326–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Logue, A. W., &Mazur, J. E. (1981). Maintenance of self-control acquired through a fading procedure: Follow-up on Mazur and Logue (1978).Behaviour Analysis Letters,1, 131–137.Google Scholar
  20. Logue, A. W., Peña-Correal, T. E., Rodriguez, M. L., &Kabela, E. (1986). Self-control in adult humans: Variation in positive reinforcer amount and delay.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,46, 159–173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Logue, A. W., Rodriguez, M. L., Peña-Correal, T. E., &Mauro, B. C. (1984). Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experienced-based differences.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,41, 53–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lowe, C. F. (1979). Determinants of human operant behavior. In M. D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.),Reinforcement and the organization of behavior (pp. 159–191). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Lowe, C. F., Beasty, A., &Bentall, R. P. (1983). The role of verbal behavior in human learning: Infant performance on fixed-interval schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,39, 157–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin, R. D. (1983).Human brain evolution in an ecological context. Fifty-second James Arthur lecture on the evolution of the human brain. New York: American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
  25. Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcer value (pp. 55–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Mazur, J. E., &Logue, A. W. (1978). Choice in a “self-control” paradigm: Effects of a fading procedure.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,30, 11–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCarthy, D. (1991). Behavioral detection theory: Some implications for applied human research. In M. L. Commons, M. Davison, & J. A. Nevin (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 11. Signal detection: Mechanisms, models, and applications (pp. 239–255). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Rachlin, H. C., &Green, L. (1972). Commitment, choice, and selfcontrol.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,17, 15–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984).Scaling: Why is animal size so important? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Tobin, H., Chelonis, J. J., &Logue, A.W. (1993). Self-control and impulsiveness in rats.Psychological Record,43, 441–454.Google Scholar
  31. Wheatley, B. P. (1980). Feeding and ranging of East BorneanMacaca fascicularis. In D. G. Lindburg (Ed.),The macaques: Studies in ecology, behavior and evolution. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry Tobin
    • 1
  • A. W. Logue
    • 1
  • John J. Chelonis
    • 1
  • Kimberly T. Ackerman
    • 1
  • Jack G. May
    • 6
  1. 1.State University of New YorkStony Brook
  2. 2.School of Liberal Arts and Sciences-A1620Baruch CollegeNew York
  3. 3.Cold Springer Harbor LaboratoryBeckman Neuroscience CenterUSA
  4. 4.Bourne LaboratoryThe New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center Westchester DivisionUSA
  5. 5.California School of Professional Psychology-Los AngelesUSA
  6. 6.Tallahassee Pain and Stress Management InstituteTallahassee

Personalised recommendations