Advertisement

Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 496–500 | Cite as

Syllabic and phonemic representations for short-term memory of speech stimuli

  • Peter Howell
Article

Abstract

An experiment is reported which uses a same-different matching paradigm in which subjects are required to indicate whether the consonants of a pair of consonant-diphthong syllables are the same or different. The question addressed is the operation of two hypothesized processes in the perception of speech sounds. The auditory level is shown to hold stimulus information for a brief period of time and be sensitive to allophonic variations within a stimulus. Moreover, matching at this level takes place by identity of the syllables rather than of the separate phoneme segments. The phonemic level is impaired when the diphthong segments of the pair leads to a contradictory match to that of the consonants of the pair, even though only the consonants are relevant to the matching decision.

Keywords

Speech Sound Stop Consonant Auditory Memory Correct Reaction Time Phoneme Boundary 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References Notes

  1. 1.
    Liberman, A. M., & Studdert-Kennedy, M.Phonetic perception. Haskins Laboratories Status Reports on Speech Research, 1977,SR-50, 21–60.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eimas, P. D., & Miller, J.Auditory memory and the processing of speech. Brown University Progress Report No. 3, Providence, Rhode Island: W. S. Hunter Laboratory of Psychology, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Repp, B. H.Posner’s paradigm and categorical perception: A negative study. Haskin’s Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, 1976,SR-45/46, 153–161.Google Scholar

References

  1. Crowoer, R. G. Visual and auditory memory. In J. F. Kavanagh & I. G. Mat-tingly (Eds.),Language by ear and by eye. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  2. Crowder, R. G., &Morton, J. Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS).Perception & Psychophysics, 1969,5, 365–373.Google Scholar
  3. Darwin, C. J., &Baddeley, A. D. Acoustic memory and the perception of speech.Cognitive Psychology, 1974,6, 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Egeth, H. E. Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics, 1966,1, 245–252.Google Scholar
  5. Fujisaki, H., & Kawashima, T. The influence of various factors on the identification and discrimination of synthetic speech sounds.Reports of the 6th International Congress on Acoustics, Tokyo, Japan, 1968.Google Scholar
  6. Howell, P., &Darwin, C. J. Some properties of auditory memory for rapid formant transitions.Memory & Cognition, 1977,5, 700–708.Google Scholar
  7. Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., &Griffith, B. C. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957,54, 358–368.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pisoni, D. B., &Tash, J. Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 285–290.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Howell
    • 1
  1. 1.University College LondonGower StreetEngland

Personalised recommendations