Abstract
Subjects decided whether two dots were on the same curve or on different curves in patterns consisting of two curves and two dots in displays that had an exposure duration of 200 msec or that remained in view until the subjects’ response. The overall size of the patterns was varied by a factor of two. Furthermore, across experiments, we manipulated the predictability of the size of the pattern on a particular trial. On half of the trials, the two dots were on the same curve; across these trials, the distance between the dots, along the curve, was manipulated systematically while the Euclidean distance between the dots was held- constant. On the other half of the trials, the two dots were on different curves. The time to respondsame increased monotonically as curve distance between the dots increased, suggesting that subjects mentally traced the curve. in order to perform the task. The absolute size of the pattern had little or no effect on the response times, indicating that it was curve distance relative to the overall pattern size, rather than absolute distance, that controlled response times. Furthermore, expectancies about pattern size had essentially no effect on performance. Taken together, the results suggest that the rate of tracing is determined by various stimulus properties that covary with the overall size of the pattern on which tracing takes place, such as the distance between the traced curve and nearby distractor curves, or the curvature of the traced curve.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Besner, D. (1983). Visual pattern recognition: Size preprocessing reexamined.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 209–216.
Besner, D., &Coltheart, M. (1975). Same-different judgments with words and nonwords: The differential effects of relative size.Memory & Cognition,3, 673–677.
Besner, D., &Coltheart, M. (1976). Mental size scaling examined.Memory & Cognition,4, 525–531.
Biederman, I. (1985). Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory.Computer Vision, Graphics, & Image Processing,32, 29–73.
Biederman, I. (1988). Aspects and extensions of a theory of human image understanding. In Z. W. Pylyshyn (Ed.),Computational processes in human vision: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 370–428). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Bundesen, C., &Larsen, A. (1975). Visual transformation of size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 214–220.
Bundesen, C., Larsen, A., &Farrell, J. E. (1981). Mental transformation of size and orientation. In A. Baddeley & J. Long (Eds.),Attention & Performance IX (pp. 279–294). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cavanagh, P. (1987). Reconstructing the third dimension: Interactions between color, texture, motion, binocular disparity, and shape.Computer Vision, Graphics, & Image Processing,37, 171–195.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 201–204.
Eriksen, C. W., &Murphy, T. D. (1987). Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 299–305.
Field, D. (1984). Two algorithms for drawing anti-aliased lines. InProceedings of Graphics Interface ’84 (pp. 87–95). Toronto: The Canadian Information Processing Society.
Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.Journal of Experimental Psychology,47, 381–391.
Hubel, D. H., &Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.Journal of Physiology (London),195, 215–243.
Humphreys, G. W. (1981). On varying the span of visual attention: Evidence for two modes of spatial attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 17–31.
Jolicoeur, P. (1988). Curve tracing operations and the perception of spatial relations. In Z. W. Pylyshyn (Ed.),Computational processes in human vision: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 133–168). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Jolicoeur, P., &Besner, D. (1987). Additivity and interaction between size ratio and response category in the comparison of size-discrepant shapes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 478–487.
Jolicoeur, P., Ullman, S., &Mackay, M. (1986). Curve tracing: A possible basic operation in the perception of spatial relations.Memory & Cognition,14, 129–140.
Jolicoeur, P., Ullman, S., & Mackay, M. (1990). Curve tracing properties. Manuscript submitted for publication.
LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 371–379.
Larsen, A. (1985). Pattern matching: Effects of size ratio, angular difference in orientation, and familiarity.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 63–68.
Larsen, A., &Bundesen, C. (1978). Size scaling in visual pattern recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 1–20.
Mahoney, J. V., &Ullman, S. (1988). Image chunking: Defining spatial building blocks for scene analysis. In Z. W. Pylyshyn (Ed.),Computational processes in human vision: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 169–209). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
McCormick, P. A., & Jolicoeur, P. (1990a). Capturing visual attention and the curve tracing operation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
McCormick, P. A., & Jolicoeur, P. (1990b). Predicting linear and nonlinear effects of distance in curve tracing: Evidence for a zoom-lens operator. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Pringle, R., &Egeth, H. E. (1988). Mental curve tracing with elementary stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 716–728.
Remington, R., &Pierce, L. (1984), Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 393–399.
Sekuler, R., &Nash, D. (1972). Speed of size scaling in human vision.Psychonomic Science,27, 93–94.
Shulman, G. L., Remington, R. W., &McLean, J. P. (1979). Moving attention through visual space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 522–526.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method.Acta Psychologica,30, 276–315.
Tanner, P. P., Jolicoeur, P., Cowan, W. B., Booth, K., &Fishman, F. D. (1988). Antialiasing: A technique for smoothing jagged lines on a computer graphics image—An implementation on the AMIGA.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,21, 59–66.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, O. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 523–530.
Ullman, S. (1984). Visual routines.Cognition,18, 97–159.
Yantis, S. (1988). On analog movements of visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 203–206.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant 0GP0000795 from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada awarded to Pierre Jolicoeur.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jolicoeur, P., Ingleton, M. Size invariance in curve tracing. Memory & Cognition 19, 21–36 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198493
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198493