Abstract
Three experiments were designed to investigate two explanations for the integration effect in memory for songs (Serafine, Crowder, & Repp, 1984; Serafine, Davidson, Crowder, & Repp, 1986). The integration effect is the finding that recognition of the melody (or text) of a song is better in the presence of the text (or melody) with which it had been heard originally than in the presence of a different text (or melody). One explanation for this finding is the physical interaction hypothesis, which holds that one component of a song exerts subtle but memorable physical changes on the other component, making the latter different from what it would be with a different companion. In Experiments 1 and 2, we investigated the influence that words could exert on the subtle musical character of a melody. A second explanation for the integration effect is the association by-contiguity hypothesis, which holds that any two events experienced in close temporal proximity may become connected in memory such that each acts as a recall cue for the other. In Experiment 3, we investigated the degree to which simultaneous presentation of spoken text with a hummed melody would induce an association between the two components. The results gave encouragement for both explanations and are discussed in terms of the distinction between encoding specificity and independent associative bonding.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bengtssen, I. (1987). Notation, motion, and perception: Some aspects of musical rhythm. In A. Gabrielson (Ed.),Action and perception in rhythm and music (pp. 69–80). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
Boring, E. G. (1957).A history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Crowder, R. G., Serafine, M. L., &Repp, B. R. (1990).Physical interaction and association by contiguity in memory for the words and melodies of songs. Status report on speech research (No. 99/100). New Haven, CT: Haskins Laboratories.
Erdfi, P. (1974).American folksongs to read, sing, and play. New York: Boosey and Hawkes.
Horowitz, L. M., &Manelis, L. (1972). Toward a theory of reintegrative memory: Adjective-noun phrases. In G. H. Bower (Ed.).The psychology of teaming and motivation (Vol. 6., pp. 193–224). New York: Academic Press.
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1974).Human memory: Theory and data. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
O’connell, D. C. (1988).Critical essays in language and philosophy. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Pollack, I., &Decker, L. R. (1958). Confidence ratings, message reception, and the receiver operating characteristic.Journal of the Acoustic Society of America,30, 288–292.
Pomerantz, J. R., &Lockhead, G. (1990).The perception of structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Serafine, M. L., Crowder, R. G., &Repp, B. H. (1984). Integration of melody and text in memory for song.Cognition,16, 285–303.
Serafine, M. L., Davidson, J., Crowder, R. G., &Repp, B. H. (1986). On the nature of melody-text integration in memory for songs.Journal of Memory A. Language,25, 123–135.
Tulving, E. (1983).Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was partially supported by NSF Grant GB 86-08344 to R. Crowder and by NICHD Grant HDO 1994 to Haskins Laboratories. We appreciate the assistance of William Flack in testing subjects and the comments of Shari Speer on an earlier version of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crowder, R.G., Serafine, M.L. & Repp, B. Physical interaction and association by contiguity in memory for the words and melodies of songs. Memory & Cognition 18, 469–476 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198480
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198480