Abstract
In four experiments employing between-list designs, generation was found to have negative effects on free recall of word pairs and on cued recall of the second word. In addition, generation had negative effects on measures of word-pair integration and on clustering in recall. In contrast, positive effects of generation were found on free recall of second words alone, and on a recognition test for memory of the second word. It was concluded that in between-list designs, generation led to greater individual-item processing of the generated term than reading, but this processing occurred at the expense of processing the relation between the words in a pair and processing the relations between different pairs in a list.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal Items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,80 (3, Pt. 2).
Begg, I., &Snider, A. (1987). The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 553–563.
Bousaeld, W. A. (1953). The occurrence of clustering m the recall of randomly arranged associates.Journal of General Psychology,49, 229–240.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 671–684
Donaldson, W., &Bass, M. (1980). Relational information and memory for problem solutions.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 26–35.
Einstein, G. O, &Hunt, R. R. (1980). Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processingJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 588–598.
Gardiner, J. M., Smith, H. E C., Richardson, C. J., Burrows, M. V., &Williams, S. D. (1985). The generation effect: Continuity between generating and reading.American Journal of Psychology,98, 373–378.
Glisky, E L, &Rabinowitz, J. C (1985) Enchancing the generation effect through repetition of operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 193–205
Graf, P. (1982). The memorial consequences of generation and transformation.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 539–548.
Hirshman, E., &Bjork, R. A. (1988). The generation effect; Support for a two-factor theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 484–494.
Hunt, R. R., &Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 497–514.
Hunt, R. R., &Seta, C. E. (1984). Category size effects in recall. The roles of relational and individual-item information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 454–464.
Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 649–667.
McDaniel, M. A. (1984). The role of elaborative and schema processes in story memory.Memory & Cognition,12, 46–51.
McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Dunay, P. K., &Cobb, R. C. (1986). Encoding difficulty and memory: Toward a unifying theory.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 645–656.
Nairne, J. S., Pusen, C., &Widner, R. L., Jr. (1985). Representation in the mental lexicon: Implications for theories of the generation effect.Memory & Cognition,13, 183–191.
Nairne, J. S., &Widner, R. L., Jr. (1987). Generation effects with nonwords: The role of test appropriateness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 164–171.
Palermo, D. S., &Jenkins, J. J. (1964).Word association norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Payne, D. G, Neely, J. H., &Burns, D. J. (1986). The generation effect: Further tests of the lexical activation hypothesis.Memory & Cognition,14, 246–252.
Poulton, E. C. (1982). Influential companions: Effects of one strategy on another in the within-subject designs of cognitive psychology.Psychological Bulletin,91, 673–690.
Rabinowitz, J. C., &Craik, F. I. M. (1986). Specific enhancement effects associated with word generation.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 226–237.
Slamecka, N. J., &Fevreiski, J. (1983). The generation effect when generation fails.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 153–163.
Slamecka, N. J., &Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Learning & Memory,4, 592–604.
Slamecka, N. J., &Katsaiti, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 589–607.
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I. (1944).The teachers' word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Tyler, S. W., Hertel, P. T., McCallum, M. C., &Ellis, H. C. (1979). Cognitive effort and memory.Journal of experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 607–617.
Winer, B. J. (1971).Statistical principles in experimental design New York: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt, S.R., Cherry, K. The negative generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Memory & Cognition 17, 359–369 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198475
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198475