Abstract
Two experiments involving paired comparisons of numerical and nonnumerical expressions of uncertainty are reported. Subjects were timed under two opposing sets of instructions (“choose higher probability” vs. “choose lower probability”). Numerical comparisons were consistently faster and easier than their nonnumerical counterparts. Consistent distance and congruity effects were obtained, illustrating that both numerical and nonnumerical expressions of uncertainty contain subjective magnitude information, and suggesting that similar processes are employed in manipulating and comparing numerical and verbal terms. To account for the general pattern of results obtained, Holyoak's reference point model (1978) was generalized by explicitly including the vagueness of the nonnumerical expressions. This generalized model is based on the notion that probability expressions can be represented by membership functions (Wallsten,Budescu, Rapoport, Zwick, & Forsyth, 1986) from which measures of location for each word, and measures of overlap for each pair can be derived. A good level of fit was obtained for this model at the individual level.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Banks, W. P., &Flora, J. (1977). Semantic and perceptual processes in symbolic comparisons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 278–290.
Banks, W. P., Fujii, M., &Kayra-Stuart, F. (1976) Semantic congruity effects in comparative judgments on magnitudes of digits.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,2, 435–447.
Besner, D., &Coltheart, M. (1979). Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English.Neuropsychologia,17, 467–472.
Beyth-Marom, R. (1982). How probable is probable? A numerical translation of verbal probability expressions.Journal of Forecasting,1, 257–269.
Buckley, P. B., &Gillman, C. B. (1974). Comparisons of digits and dot patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 1131–1136.
Budescu, D. V., &Wallsten, T. S. (1985). Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrases.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,36, 391–405.
Budescu, D. V., &Wallsten, T. S. (1987). Subjective estimation of precise and vague uncertainties. In G. Wright & P. Ayton (Eds.),Judgmental Forecasting (pp. 63–82). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Budescu, D. V., Weinberg, S., &Wallsten, T. S. (1988). Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception &:Performance,14, 281–294.
Budescu, D. V., Zwick, R., &Rapoport, A. (1986). A comparison of the eigenvalue method and the geometric mean procedure for ratio scaling.Applied Psychological Measurement,10, 69–78.
Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoningPsychological Review,76, 387–404
Coombs, C. H. (1964).A theory of data. New York: Wiley.
Crawford, G., &Williams, C. (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,29, 387–405
Foltz, G., Poltrock, S., &Potts, G. (1984) Mental comparison of size and magnitude: Size congruity effects.Journal of experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 442–453.
Holyoak, K. J. (1978). Comparative judgments with numerical reference points.Cognitive Psychology,10, 203–243.
Holyoak, K. J., &Patterson, K. K. (1981). A positional discriminability model of linear-order Judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 1283–1302.
Holyoak, K. J., &Walker, J. H. (1976). Subjective magnitude information in semantic orderings.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 287–299.
Jamieson, D G., &Petrusic, W. M. (1975). Relational judgments with remembered stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 373–378.
Johnson, E. M. (1973).Numerical encoding of qualitative expressions of uncertainty. (Technical Paper No. 250) Alexandria, VA: U S Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
Kirk, R. E. (1982).Experimental design. Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing.
Kong, A., Barnett, G. O., Mosteller, F., &Youtz, C. (1986). How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability.New England Journal of Medicine,315, 740–744.
Moyer, R. S., &Bayer, R. H. (1976). Mental comparison and the symbolic distance effect.Cognitive Psychology,8, 228–246.
Moyer, R. S., &.Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for Judgments of numerical inequality.Nature,215, 1519–1520.
Paivio, A. (1975). Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye.Memory & Cognition,3, 635–647.
Parkman, J. M. (1971). Temporal aspects of digit and letter inequality judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology,91, 191–205.
Potts, G. R. (1974). Storing and retrieving information about ordered relationships.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 431–439.
Rapoport, A., Wallsten, T. S., &.Cox, J. A. (1987). Direct and indirect scaling of membership functions of probability phrases.Mathematical Modelling,9, 397–417.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,15, 234–281.
Saaty, T. L. (1980).The analytic hierarchy process. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Takane, Y., Young, F. W., &.de Leeuw, J. (1977). Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features.Psychometrika,42, 7–67.
Torgerson, W. S. (1958).Theory and methods of scaling, New York: Wiley.
Wainer, H. (1977). Speed vs reaction time as a measure of cognitive performance.Memory & Cognition,5, 278–280.
Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V., & Erev, I. (in press). Understanding and using linguistic uncertainties.Acta Psychologica.
Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V., Rapoport, A., Zwick, R., &Forsyth, B. (1986). Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 348–365
Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V., & Zwick, R. (1986, November).On the representation and use of linguistic probabilities in judgment and decision making, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Judgment/Decision Making Society, New Orleans, LA.
Wallsten, T. S., & Erev, I. (1988).Choosing between linguistic and precise gambles A test of a theory of choice given vague information Manuscript in preparation
Wallsten, T. S., Fillenbaum, S., &Cox, J. A. (1986) Base rate effects on the interpretations of probability and frequency expressions.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 571–587.
Wallsten, T. S., Zwick, R., Kemp, S., & Budescu, D. V. (1988).Some factors affecting preference for verbal and numerical communication of uncertainty. Manuscript in preparation.
Yager, R. R. (1981). A procedure for ordering fuzzy sets on the unit interval.Information Sciences,24, 143–161.
Zimmer, A. C. (1984) A model for the interpretation of verbal predictions.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,20, 121–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the Binational Science Foundation U.S.-Israel (Jerusalem), and a Hugo Bergmann award to David V. Budescu.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaffe-Katz, A., Budescu, D.V. & Wallsten, T.S. Timed magnitude comparisons of numerical and nonnumerical expressions of uncertainty. Memory & Cognition 17, 249–264 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198463
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198463