Abstract
In a categorical frequency-estimation task, subjects have to indicate the number of exemplars from particular categories that have been shown on a list. In three experiments, the relationship between this task and the recall of exemplars with category names as cues was investigated. Three variables (generation, blocking of category exemplars, and provision of extralist cues) were shown to have identical effects on the two tasks. These results support a model of categorical frequency estimation in which subjects use a category name to retrieve exemplars and then base their frequency estimate on a count of the exemplars that have been retrieved.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alba, J. W., Chromiak, W., Hasher, L., &Attig, M. S. (1980). Automatic encoding of category size information.Joumal of experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 370–378.
Barsalou, L. W., &Ross, B. H. (1986). The roles of automatic and strategic processing in sensitivity to superordinate and property frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 116–134.
Battig, W., & Montague, W. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,80(3, Pt. 2).
Begg, I., Maxwell, D., Mitterer, J. 0., &Harris, G. (1986). Estimates of frequency: Attribute or attribution?Journal of experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 496–508.
Begg, I., &Snider, A. (1987). The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 553–563.
Brooks, J. E. (1985). Judgments of category frequency.American Journal of Psychology,98, 363–372.
Greene, R. L. (1984). Incidental learning of event frequency.Memory & Cognition,12, 90–95.
Greene, R. L. (1986). The effects of intentionality and strategy on memory for frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 489–495.
Greene, R. L. (1988). Generation effects in frequency Judgment.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory. & Cognition,14, 298–304.
Hanson, C., &Hirst, W. (1988). Frequency encoding of token and type information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 289–297.
Hintzman, D. L. (1976). Repetition and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. II, pp. 47–91. New York: Academic Press.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,93, 411–428.
Hintzman, D. L., Grandy, C. A., &Gold, E. (1981). Memory for frequency: A comparison of two multiple-trace theories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,7, 231–240.
Hintzman, D. L., Nozawa, G., &Irmscher, M. (1982). Frequency as a nonpropositional attribute of memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 127–141.
Hintzman, D. L., &Stern, L. D. (1978). Contextual variability and memory for frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 539–549.
Hunt, K. P., &Hodge, M. H. (1971). Category-item frequency and category-name meaningfulness (m'): Taxonomic norms for 84 categories.Psychonomic Monograph Supplements,4(6, Whole No. 54), 97–121.
McFarland, C. E., Jr.,Frey, T. J., &Rhodes, D. D. (1980). Retrieval of internally versus externally generated words in episodic memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 210–255
Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification LearningPsychological Review,76, 165–178.
Mueller, C. W., &Watkins, M. J. (1977). Inhibition from part-set cueing: A cue-overload interpretation.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 699–709.
Murphy, M. D., &Puff, C. R. (1982). Free recall: Basic methodology and analysis. In C. R. Puff (Ed.),Handbook of research methods in human memory and cognition (pp. 99–128). New York: Academic Press.
Nairne, J. S., Pusen, C., &Widner, R. L., Jr. (1985). Representation in the mental lexicon: Implications for theories of the generation effect.Memory & Cognition,13, 183–191.
Nairne, J. S., &Widner, R. L., Jr. (1987). Generation effects with nonwords: The role of test appropriateness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 164–171.
Nickerson, R. S. (1984). Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research.Memory & Cognition,12, 531–552.
Puff, C. R. (1974). A consolidated theoretical view of stimulus-list organization effects in free recall.Psychological Reports,34, 275–288.
Slamecka, N. J., &Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 592–604.
Slamecka, N. J., &Katsaiti, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 589–607.
Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability.Cognitive Psychology,5, 207–232.
Watkins, M. J. (1975). Inhibition in recall with extralist “cues.”Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 294–303.
Williams, K. W., &Durso, F. T. (1986). Judging category frequency: Automaticity or availability?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 387–396.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a research initiation grant from Case Western Reserve University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greene, R.L. On the relationship between categorical frequency estimation and cued recall. Memory & Cognition 17, 235–239 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198461
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198461