Abstract
The effect of topic similarity on proactive interference in sentence recall was investigated in two experiments using the Brown-Peterson paradigm. In Experiment 1, successive sentences about the same topic and related topics were both associated with substantial and progressive amounts of proactive interference; however, a significant trials × condition interaction indicated that the effect was stronger in the related-topics condition. Moreover, significant negative correlations were found between individual differences in susceptibility to proactive interference and academic achievement test scores. In Experiment 2, relatively weak effects leveling off on the second trial were obtained with sentences about unrelated topics. With some assumptions about the spread of activation during retrieval, the results were attributed to response-set interference. The practical implications of these data were also considered, and it was suggested that proactive interference might be a common cause of learning problems.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,22, 261–295.
Anderson, R. C. (1971). Encoding processes in the storage and retrieval of sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology,91, 338–340.
Blumenthal, G. B., &Robbins, D. (1977). Delayed release from proactive interference with meaningful material: How much do we remember after reading brief prose passages?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,3, 754–761.
Bower, G. H. (1974). Selective facilitation and interference in retention of prose.Journal of Educational Psychology,66, 1–8.
Dosher, B. A. (1981). The effects of delay and interference:A speedaccuracy study.Cognitive Psychology,13, 551–582.
Gunter, B., Berry, C., &Clifford, B. R. (1981). Proactive interference effects with television news items: Further evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,7, 480–487.
Gunter, B., Clifford, B. R., &Berry, C. (1980). Release from proactive interference with television new sitems: Evidence for encoding dimensions within televised news.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,6, 216–223.
Hopkins, R. H., Edwards, R. E., &Cook, C. L. (1972). The dissipation and release of proactive interference in a short-term memory task.Psychonomic Science,27, 65–67.
Hunt, E. (1980). Intelligence as an information-processing concept.British Journal of Psychology,71, 449–474.
James, W. (1890).The principles of psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Keppel, G. (1973).Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Loess, H., &Waugh, N. C. (1967). Short-term memory and inter-trial interval.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,6, 455–460.
Newton, J. M., &Wickens, D. D. (1956). Retroactive inhibition as a function of the temporal position of interpolated learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,51, 149–154.
Postman, L., &Keppel, G. (1977). Conditions of cumulative proactive inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 376–403.
Postman, L., Stark, K., &Fraser, J. (1968). Temporal changes in interference.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,7, 672–694.
Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse.Cognitive Psychology,9, 77–110.
Thorndyke, P.W., &Hayes-Roth, B. (1979). The use of schemata in the acquisition and transfer of knowledge.Cognitive Psychology,11, 82–106.
Underwood, B. J. (1957). Interference and forgetting.Psychological Review,64, 49–60.
Wickens, D. D. (1972). Characteristics of word encoding. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory. Washington, DC: Winston.
Wickens, D. D., Moody, M. J., &Dow, R. (1981). The nature and timing of the retrieval process and of interference effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 1–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from the Dean of the College of Education and the University of Nevada. Las Vegas, Research Council.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dempster, F.N. Proactive interference in sentence recall: Topic-similarity effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition 13, 81–89 (1985). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198447
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198447