Abstract
The attribute structure of a set of dot patterns was studied by having subjects segment (parse) the dots of each pattern into parts or subunits by drawing circles around groups of dots from each pattern. These parsing data were obtained for subjects who had no prior experience with the patterns and for subjects who had previously learned to identify the patterns as members of one of four categories. Analyses of the parsing data indicated that category learning increased the salience of large subunits that were similar in orientation for patterns that were members of the same category. This evidence for perceptual learning was obtained even when the category training procedure required learning to identify the patterns individually, suggesting that attribute abstraction and item learning are not incompatible. It was also obtained without an increase in overall intersubject agreement. The latter result led us to question the usefulness of intersubject agreement as an index of category knowledge.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Banks, W. P., &Prinzmetal, W. (1976). Configurational effects in visual information processing.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 361–367.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Brooks, L. R. (1978). Non-analytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. Rosch & B. C. Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorization. New York: Erlbaum.
Ellis, H. C. (1973). Stimulus encoding processes in human learning and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press.
Fried, L. S., &Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Induction of category distributions: A framework for classification learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 234–257.
Gibson, E. J. (1969).Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Gibson, J. J., &Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment?Psychological Review,62, 32–41.
Hock, H. S., Smith, L. B., Escoffery, L., Bates, A., & Field, L. (1987).The perception of pattern: Coding the positron of component elements. Manuscript in preparation.
Hock, H. S., Tromley, C., & Polmann, L. (in press). Perceptual units in the acquisition of visual categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.
Homa, D., Rhoads, D., &Chambliss, D. (1979). Evolution of conceptual structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 11–23.
Medin, D L., Dewey, G. I., &Murphy, T. D. (1983). Relationships between item and category learning: Evidence that abstraction is not automatic.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 607–625.
Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review,85, 207–238.
Medin, D. L., &Smith, E. E. (1981). Strategies and classification learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning& Memory,7, 241–253.
Murphy, G. L., &Wright, J. C. (1984). Changes in conceptual structure with expertise: Differences between real-world experts and novices.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 144–155.
Palmer, S. E. (1977). Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation.Cognitive Psychology,9, 441–474.
Rifkin, A. (1985). Evidence for a basic level in event taxonomics.Memory & Cognition,13, 538–556.
Rosch, E., &Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology,7, 573–605.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., &Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories.Cognitive Psychology,8, 382–439.
Tversky, B., &Hemenway, K. (1983). Categories of environmental scenes.Cognitive Psychology,15, 121–149.
Tversky, B., &Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts and categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 169–193.
Ward, T. B., &Scott, J. (1987). Analytic and holistic modes of learning family-resemblance concepts.Memory & Cognition,15, 42–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research reported in this paper was supported by Grants DAHC19-78-G-002 and MDA903-82-C-0317 from the Army Research Institute.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hock, H.S., Webb, E. & Cavedo, L.C. Perceptual learning in visual category acquisition. Memory & Cognition 15, 544–556 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198389
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198389