Abstract
Letters in words are identified more easily than are letters in nonwords or letters alone. These effects may depend on separate representations of general lexical attributes and of specific contexts, or on memory for particular experiences. We required subjects to associate meanings with some pseudowords and to perform a physical analysis on others. After 24 h, subjects identified pseudowords associated with meanings more accurately than novel or physically analyzed pseudowords. However, perceptual accuracy was independent of recall of meanings, suggesting that meaning was not available as a context-free resource. Instead, perceptual accuracy was correlated with the interdependence of stimulus components in perception, suggesting that encountering pseudowords for different purposes had caused different perceptual organizations, which exercised lasting influence. We concluded that the perceptual advantage of words may be incidental to the purposes for which words are ordinarily processed, and may depend on preservation of particular perceptual experiences.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baron, J., &Thurston, I. (1973). An analysis of the word superiority effect.Cognitive Psychology,4, 207–228.
Brooks, L. R. (1987). Decentralized control of categorization: The role of prior processing episodes. In U. Neisser,Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, N. J., &Squire, L. R. (1980). Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing that.Science,210, 207–210.
Estes, W K. (1975). The locus of inferential and perceptual processes in letter identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 122–145.
Fienberg, S. E. (1977).The analysis of cross-classified categorical data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gibson, E. J., Shurcliff, A., &Yonas, A. (1970). Utilization of spelling patterns by deaf and hearing subjects In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds),Basic studies in reading. New York: Basic Books.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983a) Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 21–38.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983b). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 485–508
Jacoby, L. L., &Brooks, L. R. (1984). Nonana1ytic cognition: Memory, perception, and concept formation. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 18). New York: Academic Press
Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,3, 306–340.
Jacoby, L. L., &Witherspoon, D. (1982). Remembering without awareness.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 300–324.
Kolers, P. A. (1976). Reading a year later.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2, 554–565.
Kolers, P. A., Palef, S. R., &Stelmach, L. B. (1980). Graphemic analysis underlying literacy.Memory & Cognition,8, 322–328.
Mason, M. (1975). Reading abilities and letter search time: Effects of orthographic structure defined by single-letter positional frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 146–166.
McClelland, J. L., &Johnston, J. C. (1977). The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 249–261.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of the effect of context in perception. Part I: An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
Morton, J. (1979). Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing change in the logogen model. In P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.),Proceedings of the conference on the processing of visible language. New York: Plenum Press.
Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaning-fulness of stimulus material.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 274–280.
Rumelhart, D. E., &Siple, P. (1974). The process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words.Psychological Review,81, 99–118.
Salasoo, A., Shiffrin, R. M, &Feustal, T. C. (1985). Building permanent memory codes: Codification and repetition effects in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,114, 50–77.
Smith, S. M. (1979). Remembering in and out of context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 460–471.
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press.
Tulving, E. (1983)Elements of episodic memory. London: Oxford University Press.
Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., &Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory,Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 336–342.
Warren, C., &Morton, J. (1982). The effects of priming on picture recognition.British Journal of Psychology,73, 117–129.
Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes m word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,1, 59–85.
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1987). Preservation of specific experiences in the representation of general knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 3–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this article was supported by NSERC Grant A0573.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whittlesea, B.W.A., Cantwell, A.L. Enduring influence of the purpose of experiences: Encoding-retrieval interactions in word and pseudoword perception. Memory & Cognition 15, 465–472 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198380
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198380