Abstract
Deficient processing theories of the spacing effect attribute poor recall of massed-repeated items to a failure to process one or both of the presentations fully. An implication of this approach is that anything that increases the probability that a repetition will receive full processing, or conversely, anything that decreases the probability that the item will be recognized as a repetition, should improve memorability of the item. The present set of experiments tested this prediction by manipulating the surface structure of repeated sentences. On the basis of previous research, it was assumed that memory for surface structure of sentences decays rapidly, and hence can contribute to initial identification of repetitions only at short spacings. Because this manipulation should hinder recognition of repetitions as repetitions, it was expected to induce full processing of massed repetitions, and thus facilitate recall of these items. This prediction was supported. When sentences were repeated verbatim (Experiment 1) or by the same speaker (Experiment 2), the typical spacing effect was obtained. However, when the surface structure or speaker changed at time of repetition, massed repetitions were recalled nearly as well (Experiment 1) or as well (Experiment 2) as their spaced counterparts.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R., &Paulson, R. (1977). Representation and retention of verbatim informationJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 439–451.
Begg, I. (1971). Recognition memory for sentence meaning and wording,Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 176–181.
Cornell, E. H. (1980). Distributed study facilitates infants’ delayed recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,8, 539–542
Cuddy, L. J., &Jacoby, L. L. (1982). When forgetting helps memory: An analysis of repetition effectsJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 451–467.
D’Agostino, P. R., &Deremer, P. (1973). Repetition effects as a function of rehearsal and encoding variability.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 108–113.
Elmes, D. G., &Bjork, R. A. (1975). The interaction of encoding and rehearsal processes in the recall of repeated and non-repeated words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 30–42.
Garrod, S., &Trabasso, T. (1973). A dual-memory information processing interpretation of sentence comprehensionJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 155–167
Gartman, L. M., &Johnson, N. F. (1972). Massed vs. distributed repetitions of homographs A test of the differential encoding hypothesis.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 801–808.
Geiselman, R. E., &Bellezza, F. S. (1976). Long-term memory for speaker’s voice and source location.Memory & Cognition,4, 483–489
Geiselman, R. E., &Bellezza, F. S. (1977). Incidental retention of speaker’s voice.Memory, & Cognition,5, 658–665
Geiselman, R. E., &Crawley, J. M. (1983). Incidental processing of speaker characteristics Voice as connotative information.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 15–23.
Glanzer, M., &Duarte, A. (1971). Repetition between and within languages in free recallJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 625–630.
Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition,Memory & Cognition,7, 95–112
Glenberg, A. M., &Smith, S. M. (1981). Spacing repetitions and solving problems are not the same.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 110–119.
Hintzman, D. L. (1974). Theoretical implications of the spacing effect In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hintzman, D. L., Block, R. A., &Summers, J. J. (1973). Modality tags and memory for repetitions: Laws of spacing effect.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 229–238.
Hintzman, D. L., Summers, J. J., Eki, N. T., &Moore, M. D. (1975). Voluntary attention and the spacing effect.Memory & Cognition,3, 576–580.
Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 649–667.
Jarvella, R. J. (1971). Syntactic processing of connected speech.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 409–416.
Jarvella, R. J. (1973). Coreference and short-term memory for discourse.Journal of Experimental Psychology,98, 426–428.
Kahneman, D., &Beatty, J. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory,Science,154, 1583–1585.
Keenan, J. M., Macwhinney, B., &Mahew, D. (1977). Pragmatics in memory: A study of natural conversation.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 549–560.
Kintsch, W. (1975). Memory representation of text. In R. L. Solso, (Ed.),Information processing and cognition, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kintsch, W., &Bates, E. (1977). Recognition memory for statements from a classroom lecture.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,3, 150–159.
Macfarland, C. E., Rhodes, D. D., &Frey, T. J. (1979). Semantic feature variability and spacing effect.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 163–172.
Madigan, S. A. (1969). An intraserial repetition and coding processes in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 828–835
Magliero, A. (1983). Pupil dilations following pairs of identical words and related to-be-remembered words.Memory & Cognition,11, 609–615.
Postman, L., &Knecht, K. (1983). Encoding variability and retention.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 133–152.
Rose, R. J. (1980). Encoding variability, levels of processing, and the effects of spacing upon judgments of frequency.Memory & Cognition,18, 84–93.
Rose, R. J., &Rowe, E. J. (1976). Effects of orienting task, spacing of repetitions, and list context on judgments of frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2, 142–152.
Ross, B. H., &Landauer, T. K. (1978). Memory for at least one of two items: Test and failure of retrieval theories of spacing effects.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 669–680.
Rothkopf, E. Z., &Coke, E. U. (1963). Repetition internal and rehearsal method in learning equivalences from written sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,2, 406–416.
Rundus, D. (1971). Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,89, 63–77.
Sachs, J. S. (1967). Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse.Perception & Psychophysics,2, 437–442.
Shaughnessy, J. J., Zimmerman, J., &Underwood, B. J. (1972) Further evidence on the MP-DP effect in free recall learningJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 1–12
Silverstein, L. D. (1977).Repetition and distribution effects on memory: A psychophysiological analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Slamecka, N. J., &Barlow, W. (1979). The role of semantic and surface features in word repetition effectsJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 617–627
Toppino, T. C., &Digeorge, W. (1984). The spacing effect in free recall emerges with developmentMemory & Cognition,12, 118–122
Underwood, B. J. (1970). A breakdown of the total-time law in free recall learning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 573–580.
Waugh, N. C. (1970). On the effective duration of a repeated word.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 587–595
Wright, P. (1969) Transformations and the understanding of sentencesLanguage & Speech, 156-166.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is Publication No. 140 from the Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado. The research was supported by a grant from the Martin Marietta Corporation
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dellarosa, D., Bourne, L.E. Surface form and the spacing effect. Memory & Cognition 13, 529–537 (1985). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198324
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198324