Abstract
Memory for the illocutionary force and surface form of direct and indirect speech acts was studied in two recall tasks. Both examined the effects of the context of original presentation on subjects’ ability to recall declarative and interrogative sentences. Subjects more accurately recalled the verbatim form of indirect requests and offers than that of direct assertions and queries. When prompted by contexts that preserved or changed in illocutionary force of a declarative or interrogative, subjects were equally likely to recall sentences originally used as indirect requests and offers. However, they more frequently recalled sentences originally used as direct assertions or queries when prompted by force-preserving contexts than when prompted by force-changing contexts.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ackerman, B. P. Children’s understanding of speech acts in unconventional frames.Child Development, 1978,49, 311–318.
Austin, J. L.How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.
Bates, E., Kintsch, W., &Masling, M. Recognition memory for aspects of dialogue.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978,4, 187–197.
Clark, H. H. Responding to indirect speech acts.Cognitive Psychology, 1979,11, 430–477.
Clark, H. H., &Lucy, P. Understanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed requests.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975,14, 56–72.
Ervin-Tripp, S. Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives.Language in Society, 1976,5, 25–66.
Grice, H. P. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.),Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Jarvella, R. Syntactic processing of connected speech.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971,10, 409–416.
Jarvella, R. Memory for the intentions of sentences.Memory & Cognition, 1974,1, 185–188.
Keenan, J. M., MacWhinney, B., &Mayhew, D. Pragmatics in memory: A study of natural conversation.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977,16, 549–560.
Kintsch, W., &Bates, E. Recognition memory for statements from a classroom lecture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 150–168.
Lakoff, R. What you can do with words: Politeness, pragmatics, and performatives. In A. Rogers, B. Wall, & J. P. Murphy (Eds.),Proceedings of the Texas conference on performatives, presuppositions, and implicatures. Arlington, Va: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1977.
McCawley, J. D. Remarks on the lexicography of performative verbs. In A. Rogers, B. Wall, & J. P. Murphy (Eds.),Proceedings of the Texas conference on performatives, presuppositions, and implicatures. Arlington, Va: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1977.
Sachs, J. Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse.Perception & Psychophysics, 1967,2, 437–444.
Schweller, K. G., Brewer, W. F., &Dahl, D. A. Memory for illocutionary forces and perlocutionary effects of utterances.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976,15, 325–337.
Searle, J. R.Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
Searle, J. R. Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.),Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 1975. (a)
Searle, J. R. Speech acts and recent linguistics. In D. Aaronson & R. W. Reber (Eds.),Developmental Psycholinguistics and Communication Disorders. New York: NYAS, 1975. (b)
Searle, J. R. A classification of illocutionary acts. In A. Rogers, B. Wall, & J. P. Murphy (Eds.),Proceedings of the Texas conference on performatives, presuppositions, and implicatures. Arlington, Va: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by University of Kansas General Research Allocation 3036-20-0038.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kemper, S. Memory for the form and force of declaratives and interrogatives. Memory & Cognition 8, 367–371 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198276
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198276