Effort toward comprehension: Elaboration or “aha”?

Abstract

Auble and Franks (1978) found that a process termed “effort toward comprehension” was important in facilitating recall of sentences. Four experiments were conducted to further elucidate the nature of this process. Two hypotheses were considered: (1)Effort toward comprehension involves greater elaboration or deeper processing of the sentence; (2)effort toward comprehension can be viewed as an “aha” experience (i.e., a state of noncomprehension followed by comprehension of the sentence). Results indicated that recall was significantly greater for subjects in conditions producing “aha” reactions. No support was found for the elaboration interpretation of effort toward comprehension.

References

  1. Auble, P. M., &Franks, J. J. The effects of effort toward comprehension on recall.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Morris, C. D., &Stein, B. S. Some general constraints on learning and memory research. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing and human memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bransford, J. D., &Mccarrell, N. S. A sketch of a cognitive approach to comprehension: Some thoughts about understanding what it means to comprehend. In W. B. Weimer & D. Palermo (Eds.),Cognition and the symbolic processes. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 335–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. CraiK, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learmng and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Craik, F. I. M., &Tulwng, E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975,104, 268–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Forster.K. I., &Dickinson, R. G. More on the language-asfixed-effect fallacy: Monte Carlo estimates of error rates for F1, F2, F’, and min F’.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976,15, 135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson, M. K., Doll, T. J., Bransford, J. D., &Lapinski, R. H. Context effects in sentence memory.Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 1974,103, 358–360.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kirt, R. E.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, Calif: Brooks-Cole, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review, 1973,80, 352–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant BNS 77437248, awarded to Jeffery Franks and John Bransford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Auble, P.M., Franks, J.J., Soraci, S.A. et al. Effort toward comprehension: Elaboration or “aha”?. Memory & Cognition 7, 426–434 (1979). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198259

Download citation

Keywords

  • Memory Trace
  • Recall Rate
  • Elaborative Processing
  • Redundancy Effect
  • Mixed Design Analysis