What does a person in a “TOT” state know that a person in a “don’t know” state doesn’t know

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the significance of Brown and McNeill’s (1966) findings regarding the “tip of the tongue” (TOT) phenomenon, A modified version of their procedure was used with 56 Ss. Although their findings that Ss in a TOT state can detect parts and properties of the missing word were generally replicated, a division of the TOT state into a variety of substates showed correct detection rate to vary greatly, depending on the substate involved. In addition, correct detection of partial information was demonstrated even when S declared he had no knowledge of the selected word (don’t know). It was suggested that a distinction be made between information detection based on knowledge of the characteristics common to the class of items of which the target is a member (“class detection”) and detection based on knowledge of characteristics specific to the target in question (“differential detection”). Both class and differential detection were found to obtain in TOT states as well as in the don’t know state. Some theoretical and methodological implications were suggested

References

  1. Attneave, F.Application of information theory to psychology: A summary of basic concepts, methods and results. New York: Holt, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, R., & McNeill, D. The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1966, 4, 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hart, J. T. Memory and the feeling of knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965, 56, 208–216.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mayzner, M. S., & Tresselt, M. E. Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. Psyehonomie Monograph Supplements, 1965, 1(2, Whole No. 2).

  5. Tulving, E., & Pearlstone, Z. Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1966, 5, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Woodworth, R. S.; & Sehlosberg, H.Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research was supported by a grant from the Faculty of Social Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koriat, A., Lieblich, I. What does a person in a “TOT” state know that a person in a “don’t know” state doesn’t know. Memory & Cognition 2, 647–655 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198134

Download citation

Keywords

  • Target Word
  • English Word
  • Actual Target
  • Partial Information
  • Correct Detection