Abstract
When Ss attend to one auditory message, they have no permanent memory for a second auditory message received simultaneously. Generally, it has been argued that a similar effect would occur crossmodally. This hypothesis was tested in the present experiment for messages presented to visual and auditory modalities. All Ss were tested for recognition of information presented either while shadowing or while hearing but not shadowing a passage of prose presented to one ear. One group heard a list of concrete nouns in their other ear. Three other groups received (1) printed words. (2) pictures of objects easily labeled, or (3) pictures of objects difficult to label. The shadowing task produced a decrement m recognition scores for the first three groups but not for the group receiving pictures of objects difficult to label. Further, the shadowing task interfered more with information received auditorily than with any form of visual information. These results suggest that information received visually is stored in a long-term modality-specific memory that may operate independently of the auditory modality.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atwood. G. An experimental study of visual imagination and memory. Cognitive Psychology, 1971, 2, 290–299.
Bower, G. H. Analysis of a mnemonic device. American Scientist, 1970, 58, 496–510.
Broadbent. D. E.Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press, 1958.
Broadbent. D. E.Decision and stress. New York. Academic Press. 1971.
Brooks. L. R. Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 1968, 22, 349–368.
Cherrry. E. C. Some experiments on recognition of speech with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1953, 25, 975–979.
Glucksburg. S., & Cowan. G. N., Jr. Memory for nonattended auditory material. Cognitive Psychology, 1970, 1, 149–156.
Gourevitch. V., & Galanter. E. A. A significance test for one parameter isosensitivity functions. Psychometrika, 1967, 32, 25–33.
Kroll, N. E. A., Parks. T., Parkmson. S. R., Bieber, S. L., & Johnson, A. L. Short-term memory while shadowing: Recall of visually and of aurally presented letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 85, 220–224.
Marasciulo, L. A. Extensions of the significance test for one-parameter signal detection hypotheses. Psychometrika, 1970, 35, 238–243.
Mobray, G. H. Perception and retention of verbal information presented during auditory shadowing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964, 36, 1459–1469.
Moray, N. Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959. 11, 56–60.
Neisser, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.
Norman, D. A. Memory while shadowing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 21, 85–93.
Sperling, G. A model for visual memory tasks. Human Factors, 1963, 5, 19–31.
Treisman, A. M. Strategies and models of selective attention Psychological Review, 1969, 76, 282–299.
Wickelgren, W. A Short-term recognition memory for single letters and phonemic similarity of retroactive interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 18, 55–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant 4235 from Emory University to the first author. Reprint requests should be sent to H. Rollins, Department of Psychology. Emory University, Atlanta. Georgia 30322.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rollins, H.A., Thibadeau, R. The effects of auditory shadowing on recognition of information received visually. Memory & Cognition 1, 164–168 (1973). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198088
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198088