Abstract
The study considered whether Ss use the same strategies in categorizing biographical descriptions as in perceptual classifications. A biographical description consisted of a person’s age, income, number of children, and years of education. The Ss were asked to classify these descriptions as residents of two different suburbs in order to compare the results with a previous study using schematic faces. The 123 Ss were assigned to one of three alternative organizations of the descriptions: a table, a “name” organized paragraph in which each person was successively described, or an “attribute” organized paragraph in which each attribute was successively described. Essentially the same results were obtained for schematic faces and biographical descriptions, except for a few differences which were attributed to the use of more realistic categories (suburbs) in the present study. When more realistic categories are used, a S’s prior experience can influence which attributes he emphasizes and possibly his formation of an abstract prototype.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bradshaw, J. L. The information conveyed by varying the dimensions of features in human outline faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 1969, 6, 5–9.
Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. Abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology. 1971, 2, 331–350.
Bruner. J. S. On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 123–152
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austan, G. A.A study of thinking. New York. Wiley, 1956
Evans. S. H., & Edmonds, E. M. Schema discrimination as a function of training. Psychonomic Science, 1966, 5, 303–304.
Franks. J. J., & Bransford, J. D. Abstraction of Visual patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 90, 65–74.
Frase. L. T. Paragraph organization of written materials: The influence of conceptual clustering upon the level and organization of recall. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1969, 60, 394–401
Friedman. M. P., & Greitzer. F. L. Organization and study time in learning from reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, in press.
Glaser. R., & Resnick. L. B. Instructional psychology. In P. H. Mussen and M. R. Rosenzweig (Eds).Annual review of psychology Palo Alto. Cahf Annual Reviews Inc., 1972.
Heider. E. R. On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. M. Moore (Ed.).Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press. 1972.
Himmelfarb. S., & Senn, D. J. Forming impressions of social class: Two tests of an averaging model. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 1969, 12, 38–51.
Holher, J., & Evans, S. H. Schematic concept formation with linguaform patterns. Psychonomic Science. 1967, 9, 89–90.
Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1968, 77, 353–363
Reed, S. K. Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 1972, 3, 382–407.
Reed, S. K.PsychologTcal processes in pattern recognition New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Sebestyen. G. S.Decision-making processes tn pattern recognition, New York: Macmillan, 1962.
Torgerson. W. S.Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley. 1958
Wohlwill, J. From perception to inference: A dimension of cognitive development In W. Kesson and C. Kuhlman (Eds). Thought in the young child. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development. 1962, 27, 87–112.
Young, F. W. TORSCA-9. a Fortran IV program for nonmetric multidimentsional scaling. Behavioral Science, 1968, 13, 373–344
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant MH-21115 to the first author and NIMH Grant MH-07809 to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reed, S.K., Friedman, M.P. Perceptual vs conceptual categorization. Memory & Cognition 1, 157–163 (1973). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198087
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198087