Abstract
In Experiment 1, hamsters started from their permanent home at the periphery of a circular arena and headed to a food source at the center. They then returned, fully laden with food, along a direct path to their home. On control trials, in which no manipulation takes place, visual cues outside the arena and dead reckoning (i.e., updated internal references generated during the outward journey to the food source) controlled the return journey. On experimental trials, the arena, with the hamster in its nest, was rotated by 90°, putting dead reckoning at variance with the distal visual environment. The animals were rewarded for going with dead reckoning. At first, they favored the distal cues, but later most of the subjects switched to using dead reckoning. Thus, hamsters are flexible enough to recalibrate the relative weight that they normally attribute to different sets of spatial cues. In Experiment 2, the reliance on dead-reckoning was greatly enhanced when a cue card at the nest entrance was rotated along with the arena, pitting one proximal cue plus dead reckoning against distal cues. Hence, dead reckoning and external cues seem to reinforce each other through their mutual correlation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Batschelet, E. (1981).Circular statistics in biology. London: Academic Press.
Breeze, C. R., Hampson, R. E., &Deadwyler, S. A. (1989). Hippocampal place cells: Stereotypy and plasticity.Journal of Neuroscience,9, 1097–1111.
Cheng, K. (1986). A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation.Cognition,23, 149–178.
Cheng, K. (1989). The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,15, 366–375.
Cheng, K., Collett, T. S., Pickhard, A., &Wehner, R. (1987). The use of visual landmarks by honeybees: Bees weight landmarks according to their distance from the goal.Journal of Comparative Physiology A,161, 469–475.
Collett, T. S., Cartwright, B. A., &Smith, B. A. (1986). Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils.Journal of Comparative Physiology A,158, 835–851.
Diez-Chamizo, V., Sterio, D., &Mackintosh, N. J. (1985). Blocking and overshadowing between intra-maze and extra-maze cues: A test of the independence of locale and guidance learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37B, 235–253.
Etienne, A. S. (1987). The control of short distance homing in the golden hamster. In P. Ellen & C. Thinus-Blanc, (Eds.),Cognitive processes and spatial orientation in animal and man (pp. 233–251). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Etienne, A. S. (1992). Navigation of a small mammal by dead reckoning and local cues.Current Directions in Psychological Science,1, 48–52.
Etienne, A. S., Maurer, R., &Saucy, F. (1988). Limitations in the assessment of path dependent information.Behaviour,106, 81–111.
Etienne, A. S., Maurer, R., Saucy, F., &Teroni, E. (1986). Shortdistance homing in the golden hamster after a passive outward journey.Animal Behaviour,34, 696–715.
Etienne, A. S., Teroni, E., Hurni, C., &Portenier, V. (1990). The effect of a single light cue on homing behaviour of the golden hamster.Animal Behaviour,39, 17–41.
Gallistel, C. R. (1990).The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hill, A. J., &Best, P. J. (1981). Effects of deafness and blindness on the spatial correlates of hippocampal unit activity in the rat.Experimental Neurology,74, 204–217.
Hughey, D. J., &Koppenaal, R. J. (1987). Hippocampal lesions in rats alter learning about intramaze cues.Behavioral Neuroscience,101, 634–643.
Kraemer, P. J., Gilbert, M. E., &Innis, N. K. (1983). The influence of cue type and configuration upon radial-maze performance in the rat.Animal Learning & Behaviour,11, 373–380.
Leonard, B., &McNaughton, B. L. (1990). Spatial representation in the rat: Conceptual, behavioral, and neurophysiological perspectives. In R. P. Kesner & D. S.Olton (Eds.),Neurobiology of comparative cognition (pp. 363–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mackintosh, J. H. (1973). Factors affecting the recognition of territory boundaries by mice (Mus musculus).Animal Behaviour,21, 464–470.
March, J., Chamizo, V. D., &Mackintosh, N. J. (1992). Reciprocal overshadowing between intra-maze and extra-maze cues.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,45B, 49–63.
Margulis, J., &Gallistel, C. R. (1988). Heading in the rat: Determination by environmental shape.Animal Learning & Behavior,16, 404–410.
Miller, V. A., &Best, P. J. (1980). Spatial correlates of hippocampal unit activity are altered by lesions of the fornix and entorhinal cortex.Brain Research,194, 311–323.
Mittelstaedt, H., &Mittelstaedt, M.-L. (1982). Homing by path integration. In F. Papi & H. G. Wallraff (Eds.),Avian navigation (pp. 290–297). Berlin: Springer.
Muller, R. U., &Kubie, J. L. (1987). The effects of changes in the environment on the spatial firing of hippocampal complex-spike cells.Journal of Neuroscience,7, 1951–1968.
Muller, R. U., Kubie, J. L., Bostock, E. M., Taube, J. S., &Quirk, G. J. (1991). Spatial firing correlates of neurons in the hippocampal formation of freely moving rats. In J. Paillard (Ed.),Brain and space (pp. 296–333). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O’Keefe, J., &Conway, D. H. (1978). Hippocampal place units in the freely moving rat: Why they fire where they fire.Experimental Brain Research,31, 573–590.
O’Keefe, J., &Nadel, L. (1978).The hippocampus as a cognitive map. London: Clarendon Press.
Olton, D. S. (1979). Mazes, maps, and memory.American Psychologist,34, 583–596.
Olton, D. S. (1990). Spatial perception: Behavioral and neural analyses. In C. Stebbins & M. A. Berkley (Eds.),Comparative percep-tion: Complex signals (Vol. 2, pp. 217–244). New York: Wiley.
Olton, D. S., &Collison, C. (1979). Intramaze cues and “odor trails” fail to direct choice behavior on an elevated maze.Animal Learning & Behavior,7, 221–223.
Olton, D. S., Collison, C, &Werz, M. A. (1977). Spatial memory and radial arm maze performance of rats.Learning & Motivation,8, 289–314.
Olton, D. S., &Samuelson, R. J. (1976). Remembrance of places passed: Spatial memory in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,2, 97–116.
Restle, F. (1956). Discrimination of cues in mazes: A resolution of the “place-vs.-response” question.Psychological Review,64, 217–288.
Sherry, D. V. (1984). What food-storing birds remember.Canadian Journal of Psychology,38, 304–321.
Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Suzuki, S., Augerinos, G., &Black, A. H. (1980). Stimulus control of spatial behavior on the eight-arm maze in rats.Learning & Motivation,11, 1–18.
Teroni, E., Portenier, V., &Etienne, A. S. (1987). Spatial orientation of the golden hamster in conditions of conflicting location-based and route-based information.Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology,20, 389–397.
Warburton, K. (1990). The use of local landmarks by foraging goldfish.Animal Behaviour,40, 500–505.
Watson, J. B. (1907). Kinesthetic and organic sensations: Their role in the reaction of the white rat to the maze.Psychological Review Monograph Supplements,8 (Whole No. 33), 1–100.
Wehner, R. (1981). Spatial vision in arthropods. In H. Autrum (Ed.),Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. VII/6C, pp. 287–616). Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Swiss NSF Grant 31-26227.89. We wish to thank Roland Maurer for his help in the evaluation of the results, Raynald Schumacher for his technical assistance, and Alex Kfouri, Marcia L. Spetch, Vincent M. LoLordo, and an anonymous referee for their helpful suggestions concerning a first and second version of the manuscript. Special thanks are due to Ken Cheng for his critical comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Etienne, A.S., Lambert, S.J., Reverdin, B. et al. Learning to recalibrate the role of dead reckoning and visual cues in spatial navigation. Animal Learning & Behavior 21, 266–280 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197991
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197991