Abstract
When a caloric substance is followed by a flavored substance, preference for the flavor that followed the calories can increase because of a flavor-nutrient association. We showed here that this effect is opposed by a fullness effect: consuming the caloric substance itselfreduces-consuniption of the flavor that follows. Because consumption of this flavor was less than consumption of a flavor that was given alone, there was a reduced preference for the flavor that followed the calories—an effect opposing flavor-nutrient learning. The preference for the flavor that was given alone and consumed in greater amounts seems to be due to exposure per se and is not a result of contrast. When the amount of the flavor given alone was directly controlled so that it was one half the amount of the flavor that followed the calories, preference for the flavor following the calories was no higher than when consumption of the two flavors was equal. Thus, exposure can interfere with flavor-nutrient learning, but does not enhance it.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Boakes, R. A., &Lubart, T. (1988). Enhanced preference for a flavour following reversed flavour-glucose pairing.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40B, 49–62.
Capaldi, E. D., Campbell, D. H., Sheffer, J. D., &Bradford, J. P. (1987). Non-reinforcing effects of giving “dessert” in rats.Appetite,9, 99–112.
Capaldi, E. D., &Sheffer, J. D. (1992). Contrastand reinforcement in consumption.Learning & Motivation,23, 63–79.
Domjan, M. (1976). Determinants of the enhancement of flavored-water intake by prior exposure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,2, 17–27.
Domjan, M. (1977). Attenuation and enhancement of neophobia for edible substances. In L. M. Barker, M. R. Best, & M. Domjan (Eds.),Learning mechanisms in food selection (pp. 151–180). Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
Flaherty, C. F. (1982). Incentive contrast: A review of behavioral changes following shifts in reward.Animal Learning & Behavior,10, 409–440.
Hearst, E., &Wolff, W. T. (1989). Addition versus deletion as a signal.Animal Learning & Behavior,17, 120–133.
Holder, M. D. (1991). Conditioned preferences for the taste and odor components of flavors: Blocking but not overshadowing.Appetite,17, 29–45.
Holman, E. W. (1975). Immediate and delayed reinforcers for flavor preference in rats.Learning & Motivation, 6, 91–100.
Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.),Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279–296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Lavin, M. J. (1976). The establishment of flavor-flavor associations using a sensory preconditioning training procedure.Learning & Motivation,7, 173–183.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by Grant MH39253 to the second author from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Owens, J., Capaldi, E.D. & Sheffer, J.D. An exposure effect opposes flavor-nutrient learning. Animal Learning & Behavior 21, 196–202 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197982
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197982