Abstract
Rats were trained in a three-alternative spatial delayed matching-to-sample task in a starburst maze. Samples consisted of rewarded forced choices of one arm, and retention was indicated by rats’ returning to that arm after a 90-sec delay. If a rat made an error on its first choice, it was returned to the start compartment and allowed a second choice. Unlike in previous experiments with this task, all three arms were available during the animals’ second choices. The rats tended to perseverate in their second choices by returning to the arm that they had erroneously visited on their first choice. In Experiment 1, the accuracy of second choices following first-choice errors was below chance during the first block of sessions, when a 90-sec delay intervened between the first choice and the second choice, and at chance during the second block of sessions, when a short (5–6 see) delay intervened between first and second choices. In Experiment 2, long-delay and short-delay sessions were randomly presented to naive subjects. Similar results were obtained. In both experiments, the tendency to repeat the erroneous first choice was greater when long delays separated the two choices than when short delays were used. The results suggest that rats make their first-choice errors because they erroneously encode or remember the location of the sample and that they base their second choices on the same erroneous-memory. The increase in perseveration at long delays implies some kind of rehearsal-like mechanism that slows forgetting of the memory controlling the first choice.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Dale, R. H. I. (1988). Spatial memory in pigeons on a four-arm radial maze.Canadian Journal of Psychology,42, 78–83.
Dimattia, B. V., &Kesner, R. P. (1984). Serial position curves in rats: Automatic versus effortful information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 557–563.
Edhouse, W. V., &White, K. G. (1988). Sources of proactive interference in animal memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 56–70.
Grant, D. S. (1984). Rehearsal in pigeon short-term memory. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds),Animal cognition (pp. 99–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Grant, D. S., &Roberts, W. A. (1973). Trace interaction in pigeon short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,101, 21–29.
Herrmann, T., Bahr, E., Bremner, B., &Ellen, P. (1982). Problem solving in the rat: Stay versus shift solutions on the three-table task.Animal Learning & Behavior,10, 39–45.
Mater, N, R. F. (1932). A study of orientation in the rat.Journal of Comparative Psychology,14, 387–399.
Maki, W. S. (1981). Directed forgetting in pigeons. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.),Information processing in animals (pp. 199–226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Olton, D. S., Walker, J. A., Gage, F. H., III, &Johnson, C. T. (1977). Choice behavior of rats searching for food.Learning & Motivation,8, 315–331.
Roberts, W. A., &Grant, D. S. (1976). Studies in short-term memory in pigeons using delayed matching to sample procedure. In D. L. Medin, W. A. Roberts, & R. T. Davis (Eds.),Processes of animal memory (pp. 79–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roitblat, H. L. (1980). Codes and coding processes in pigeon short-term memory.Animal Learning & Behavior,8, 341–351.
Roitblat, H. L. (1982). The meaning of representation in animal memory.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,5, 353–406.
Roitblat, H. L. (1984a). Pigeon working memory: Models for delayed matching-to-sample performance. In M. L. Commons, A. R. Wagner, & R. J. Herrnstein (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Discrimination processes (Vol. 4, pp. 161–181). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Roitblat, H. L. (1984b). Representations in pigeon working memory. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition (pp. 79–97). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roitblat, H. L. (1987).Introduction to comparative cognition. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Roitblat, H. L., &Harley, H. E. (1988). Rat spatial delayed matching-to-sample performance: Acquisition and retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 71–82.
Roitblat, H. L., Harley, H. E., &Helweg, D. A. (1989). The effects of scopolamine on proactive interference and spatial delayed matching-to-sample performance in rats.Psychobiology,17, 402–408.
Roitblat, H. L., Penner, R. H., &Nachtigall, P. F. (1990). Matching-to-sample by an echolocating dolphin (Tursiops truncatus).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,16, 85–95.
Roitblat, H. L., &Scopatz, R. A. (1983). Sequential effects in delayed matching-to-sample.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,9, 202–221.
Wright, A. A. (1989). Memory processing by pigeons, monkeys, and people. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 24, pp. 25–70). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant BNS 85-05681.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adams-pepper, S., Gagnon, S., Fore, S. et al. Rats remember not wisely but too well. Animal Learning & Behavior 20, 363–372 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197959
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197959