Abstract
Rats were trained on a series of reversals of a two-choice conditional discrimination. Choice responses were followed by different delays of reinforcement, which were either unsignaled or filled with either a brief or a long tone. In some conditions, the tone occurred following both correct and incorrect choices; in other conditions, the tone occurred only after correct choices. Presentation of the tone following only correct choices greatly facilitated the acquisition of the discrimination, and there was little effect of the tone’s duration. Presentation of the tone following all choices did not improve discrimination acquisition relative to the no-signal condition. The results demonstrate facilitatory effects of a signal during a delay-of-reinforcement interval that are caused by the conditioned-reinforcement properties of the signal and cannot he explained by the alternative mechanisms of marking or bridging.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Honey, R. C., Schachtman, T. R., &Hall, G. (1987). Partial rein-forcement in serial autoshaping: The role of attentional and associative factors.Learning & Motivation,18, 288–300.
Kaplan, P. S., &Hearst, E. (1982). Bridging temporal gaps between the CS and US in autoshaping: Insertion of other stimuli before, during, and after CS.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,8, 187–203.
Lieberman, D. A., Davidson, F. H., &Thomas, G. V. (1985). Marking in pigeons: The role of memory in delayed reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,11, 611–624.
Lieberman, D. A., McIntosh, D. C., &Thomas, G. V. (1979). Learning when reward is delayed: A marking hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,5, 224–242.
Lieberman, D. A., &Thomas, G. V. (1986). Marking, memory, and superstition in the pigeon.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,38B, 449–459.
Reed, P. (1989). Marking effects in instrumentnal performance on DRH schedules.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41B, 337–353.
Reed, P., &Hall, G. (1989). The quasi-reinforcement effect: The influence of brief stimuli uncorrelated with reinforcement on variableratio schedules.Learning & Motivation,20, 242–261.
Rescorla, R. A. (1982). Effect of a stimulus intervening between CS and US in autoshaping.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,8, 131–141.
Royalty, P., Williams, B. A., &Fantino, E. (1987). Effects of delayed conditioned reinforcement in chain schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,47, 41–56.
Schaal, D. W., &Branch, M. N. (1988). Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of unsignaled, briefly signaled, and completely signaled delays to reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,50, 33–54.
Schaal, D. W., &Branch, M. N. (1990). Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of signaled-delayed reinforcement: Effects of delay-signal duration.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,53, 103–121.
Spence, K. W. (1947). The role of secondary reinforcement in delayed reward learning.Psychological Review,54, 1–8.
Thomas, G. V., &Lieberman, D. A. (1980). Commentary: Determinants of success and failure in experiments on marking.Learning & Motivation,21, 110–124.
Thomas, G. V., Lieberman, D. A., McIntosh, D. C., &Robertson, P. (1983). The role of marking when reward is delayed.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,9, 401–411.
Thomas, G. V., Robertson, D., &Cunniffe, G. (1989). Facilitation of responding in a filled-delay trace autoshaping procedure: An occasion-setting hypothesis.Learning & Motivation,20, 225–241.
Thomas, G. V., Robertson, D., &Lieberman, D. A. (1987). Marking effects in Pavlovian trace conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,9, 401–411.
Urcuioli, P. J., &Kasprow, W. J. (1988). Long-delay learning in the T-maze: Effects of marking and delay-interval location.Learning & Motivation,19, 66–86.
Williams, B. A. (1971). The effects of intertriai interval on discrimination reversal learning in the pigeon.Psychonomic Science,23, 241–243.
Williams, B. A. (1981). Invariance in reinforcements to acquisition, with implications for the theory of inhibition.Behaviour Analysis Letters,1, 73–80.
Williams, B. A., &Dunn, R. (1991a). Preference for conditioned reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,55, 37–46.
Williams, B. A., &Dunn, R. (1991b). Substitutability between conditioned and primary reinforcers in discrimination acquisition.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,55, 21–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was sponsored by NIMH Grant MH 42797 and an NSF grant to the University of California, San Diego.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, B.A. Marking and bridging versus conditioned reinforcement. Animal Learning & Behavior 19, 264–269 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197885
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197885