Abstract
Higher order occasion setting with serially presented stimuli was investigated in an appetitively motivated, discrete-trial operant study with rats. Reinforcement of barpressing during an occasion-setting light (a discriminative stimulus) was contingent on immediately preceding second-order occasion setters (i.e., a click train or a buzzer served as a conditional discriminative stimulus). Moreover, the meanings of the clicks and buzzer were themselves indicated by a third-order occasion setter that preceded them (i.e., a white noise acted as a second-order conditional discriminative stimulus). Subjects responded more frequently and had shorter latencies to the first response in the presence of the light on trials during which barpressing was reinforced than on trials during which barpressing was not reinforced. The likelihood that the subjects solved the problem by responding to unique compound stimuli was minimized by the insertion of a 5-sec gap between the different controlling stimuli presented on each trial. Thus, these subjects appear to have mastered a second-order conditional discrimination, which is equivalent to third-order occasion setting if the discriminative stimulus (light) is viewed as a first-order occasion setter. Although the subjects learned to respond appropriately to each of the compound stimuli, differences in responding to specific stimuli were consistent with a higher order feature-positive effect. Some implications of higher order occasion setting are discussed, including the issue of independence between the different levels of occasion setting signaled by a single stimulus.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Asratyan, E. A. (1961). The initiation and localization of cortical inhibition in the conditioned reflex arc.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,92, 1141–1159.
Biederman, I. (1972). Human performance in contingent information-processing tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 219–238.
Cohen, L. R., Looney, T. A., Brady, J. H., &Aucella, A. F. (1976). Differential sample response schedules in the acquisition of conditional discriminations in pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,26, 301–314.
Colwill, R. M., &Rescorla, R. A. (1990). Evidence for the hierarchical structure of instrumental learning.Animal Learning & Behavior,18, 71–82.
Davidson, T. L., Aparicio, J., &Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Transfer between Pavlovian facilitators and instrumental discriminative stimuli.Animal Learning & Behavior,16, 285–291.
Edwards, C. A., Miller, J. S., &Zentall, T. R. (1985). Control of pigeons’ matching and mismatching performance by instructional cues.Animal Learning & Behavior,13, 383–391.
Gollin, E. S. (1966). Solution of conditional discrimination problems by young children.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,62, 454–456.
Hearst, E. (1978). Stimulus relationships and feature selection in learning and behavior. In S. Hülse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive processes in animal behavior (pp. 51–88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Holland, P. C. (1983). Occasion-setting in Pavlovian feature-positive discriminations. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.),Quantitative analysis of behavior: Discrimination processes (Vol. 4, pp. 183–206). New York: Ballinger.
Holland, P. C. (1985). The nature of conditioned inhibition in serial and simultaneous feature negative discriminations. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.),Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 267–297). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Holland, P. C. (1990). Forms of memory in Pavlovian conditioning. In J. L. McGaugh, N. M. Weinberger, & G. Lynch (Eds.),Brain organization and memory: Cells, systems, and circuits (pp. 78–105). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lashley, K. S. (1938). Conditional reactions in the rat.Journal of Psychology,6, 311–324.
Lolordo, V. M., &Ross, R. T. (1990). Retraction of Ross and LoLordo findings concerning blocking in serial feature-positive discriminations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,16, 402–406.
Looney, T. A., Cohen, L. R., Brady, J. H., &Cohen, P. S. (1977). Conditional discrimination performance by pigeons on a response-independent procedure.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,27, 363–370.
Maki, W. S. (1979). Pigeon’s short-term memories for surprising vs. expected reinforcement and nonreinforcement.Animal Learning & Behavior,1, 31–37.
Nevin, J. A., &Liebold, K. (1966). Stimulus control of matching and oddity in a pigeon.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,5, 351–352.
Nissen, H. W. (1951). Analysis of a complex conditional reaction in chimpanzee.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,44, 9–16.
Rescorla, R. A. (1985). Conditioned inhibition and facilitation. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.),Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 299–326). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rescorla, R. A. (1986). Facilitation and excitation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,12, 325–332.
Rescorla, R. A. (1987). Facilitation and inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,13, 250–259.
Rescorla, R. A., Grau, J. W., &Durlach, P. J. (1985). Analysis of the unique cue in configurai discriminations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,11, 356–366.
Ross, R. T. (1983). Relationships between the determinants of performance in serial feature-positive discriminaüons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,9, 349–373.
Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.),Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sidman, M., Kirk, B., &Willson-Morris, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,43, 21–42.
Skinner, B. F. (1938).The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century.
Thomas, D. R., Curran, P. J., &Russell, R. J. (1988). Factors affecting conditional discrimination learning in pigeons: II. Physical and temporal characteristics of stimuli.Animal Learning & Behavior,16, 468–476.
Trapold, M. A. (1970). Are expectancies based upon different positive reinforcing events discriminably different?Learning & Motivation,1, 129–140.
Wilson, P. N., &Pearce, J. M. (1989). A role for stimulus generalization in conditional discrimination learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41B, 243–273.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Support for this research was provided by National Science Foundation Grant BNS 86-00755, National Institute of Mental Health Grant 33881, and the SUNY-Binghamton Center for Cognitive and Psycholinguistic Sciences. Thanks are extended to Susan L. Priore for her collection of pilot data and to Robert C. Barnet, James J. Esposito, Steve C. Hallam, and Todd R. Schachtman for their comments on an early version of the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arnold, H.M., Grahame, N.J. & Miller, R.R. Higher order occasion setting. Animal Learning & Behavior 19, 58–64 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197860
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197860