Abstract
Two experiments tested the motivational role of the US in classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane (NM) response. In Experiment 1, subjects were trained to an intermediate performance level and then given a series of (1) CS-US trials, (2) “backwards” US-CS trials, (3) CS-alone trials, (4) US-alone trials, or (5) no-stimulus presentations. Interpolated presentations of the US, either alone or in a backwards contingency, tended to produce an impairment of subsequent acquisition. In Experiment 2, subjects were trained with strong or weak US intensity on paired or interpolated trials. US intensity on interpolated trials had only a very small effect, whereas the effect of US intensity on paired trials was quite large. Shifts in paired-trial US intensity produced corresponding shifts in performance, but shifts in the intensity of the interpolated US produced no apparent effect. We conclude that the arousal of motivation is not sufficient to maintain performance in classical NM conditioning.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bruner, A. UCS properties in classical conditioning of the albino rabbit’s nictitating membrane response.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965,69, 186–192.
Bruner, A. Facilitation of classical conditioning in rabbits by reinforcing brain stimulation.Psychonomic Science, 1966,6, 211–212.
Dufort, R. H., &Kimble, G. A. Ready signals and the effect of interpolated UCS presentations in eyelid conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958,56, 1–7.
Frey, P. W., &Butler, C. S. Extinction after aversive conditioning: An associative or nonassociative process?Learning and Motivation, 1977,8, 1–17.
Frey, P. W., &Gavin, W. Overnight incubation of a partially conditioned eyeblink response in rabbits.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1975,3, 114–118.
Frey, P. W., Maisiak, R., &Dugue, G. Unconditional stimulus characteristics in rabbit eyelid conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1976,2, 175–190.
Goodrich, K. P., Ross, L. E., &Wagner, A. R. Performance in eyelid conditioning following interpolated presentations of the UCS.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957,53, 214–217.
Goodrich, K. P., Ross, L. E., &Wagner, A. R. Supplementary report: Effect of interpolated UCS trials in eyelid conditioning without a ready signal.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959,58, 319–320.
Gormezano, I. Classical conditioning. In J. B. Sidowski (Ed.),Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.
Gormezano, I. Investigations of defense and reward conditioning in the rabbit. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.
Grant, D. A., McFarling, C., &Gormezano, I. Temporal conditioning and the effect of interpolated UCS presentations in eyelid conditioning.Journal of General Psychology, 1960,63, 249–257.
Grevert, P., &Moore, J. W. The effects of unpaired US presentations on conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response: Consolidation or contingency.Psychonomic Science, 1970,20, 177–179.
Hoehler, F. K., Kirschenbaum, D. S., &Leonard, D. W. The effects of overtraining and successive extinctions upon nictitating membrane conditioning in the rabbit.Learning and Motivation, 1973,4, 91–101.
Hoehler, F. K., &Thompson, R. F. Effect of the interstimulus (CS-UCS) interval on hippocampal unit activity during classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit (Orvctolagus cuniculus).Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1980,94, 201–215.
Hull, C. L. Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century, 1943.
Kimble, G. A. Hilgard and Marquis’ Conditioning and learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1961.
Kimble, G. A., &Dufort, R. H. The associative factor in eyelid conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1956,52, 386–391.
Kimble, G. A., Mann, L. I., &Dufort, Ft. H. Classical and instrumental eyelid conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955,49, 407–417.
Kimble, G. A., &Ost, J. W. P. Influence of unpaired UCS presentations on eyelid conditioning.Psychological Reports, 1961,9, 239–245.
Leonard, D. W., Fischbein, L. C., &Monteau, J. E. The effects of interpolated US alone (USa) presentations on classical nictitating membrane conditioning in rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).Conditional Reflex, 1972,7, 107–114.
Levinthal, C. F. The CS-US interval function in rabbit nictitating membrane response conditioning: Single vs. multiple trials per conditioning session.Learning and Motivation, 1973,4, 259–267.
Loess, H. Effect of unpaired UCS presentations on performance in eyelid conditioning.Psychological Reports, 1964,15, 439–444.
Martin, G. K., Land, T., &Thompson, R. F. Classical conditioning of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane response, with electrical brain stimulation as the unconditioned stimulus.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1980,94, 216–226.
McAllister, W. R., &McAllister, D. E. The influence of the ready signal and unpaired UCS presentations on eyelid conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960,60, 30–35.
Mis, F. W., &Moore, J. W. Effect of preacquisition UCS exposure on classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response.Learning and Motivation, 1973,4, 108–114.
Salafia, W. R., Daston, A. P., Bartosiak, R. S., Hurley, J., &Martino, L. J. Classical nictitating membrane conditioning in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) as a function of unconditioned stimulus locus.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1974,86, 628–636.
Smith, M. C. CS-LS interval and US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968,66, 679–687.
Spence, K. W. Learning and performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of intensity of the UCS.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953,45, 57–63.
Spence, K. W., Haggard, D. F., &Ross, L. E. UCS intensity and the associative (habit) strength of the eyelid CR.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958,55, 404–411.
Trapold, M. A., &Spence, K. W. Performance changes in eyelid conditioning as related to the motivational and reinforcing properties of the UCS.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960,59, 209–213.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoehler, F.K., Leonard, D.W. Motivational vs. associative role of the US in classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response. Animal Learning & Behavior 9, 239–244 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197826
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197826