Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to explore the switching of attention between perception and memory. In Experiment 1, college students performed a task that required them to cycle or switch attention between perceptual and memorial inputs. Switching times of 293 and 376 msec per switch were obtained on the basis of two formulas. In Experiment 2, the attentional load was manipulated by varying the number of perceptual and memorial inputs. Switching time increased as a function of list length, indicating that item load affects both the control processes that set attentional allocation policies and one’s ability to perform memory and/or perceptual tasks. These results suggest that modularity, or encapsulation of item and control-process systems, does not hold. A model is presented that depicts the relation between item and control-process representation in rapidly alternating attention between perception and memory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baddeley, A. (1982). Reading and working memory.Bulletin of the British Psychological Society,35, 414–417.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon Press.
Brad, D. M., &Gholson, B. (1984). A cognitive-developmental model of reading. In B. Gholson & T. L. Rosenthal (Eds.),Application of cognitive-developmental theory. New York: Academic Press.
Dyer, R. N. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes.Memory & Cognition,1, 106–120.
Fooor, J. A. (1983).The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
JERsILD, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift.Archives of Psychology (Whole No. 89).
Johnston, W. A., &Heinz, S. P. (1978). Flexibility and capacity demands of attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,107, 420–435.
Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kirk, R. E. (1968).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Laberge, D. (1973). Identification of two components of the time to switch attention: A test of a serial and a parallel model of attention. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press.
Logan, G. (1980). Short-term memory demands of reaction-time tasks that differ in complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 375–389.
Moray, N. (1967). Where is capacity limited? A survey and a model.Acta Psychologica,27, 84–92.
Pascual-Leone, J. A. (1970). Mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget’s developmental stages. Acta Psychologica,32, 301–345.
Shulman, G. L., Remington, R. W., &Mclean, J. P. (1978). Moving attention through visual space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 522–526.
Sector, A., &Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited.American Journal of Psychology,89, 669–679.
Treisman, A. M. (1960). Contextual cues in encoding listening.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,12, 342–348.
Weaer, R. J., Blagowsky, J., &Mankin, R. (1982). Switching time between overt and covert speech: Generative attention.Memory & Cognition,10, 546–553.
Winer, B. J. (1971).Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weber, R.J., Burt, D.B. & Noll, N.C. Attention switching between perception and memory. Memory & Cognition 14, 238–245 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197699
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197699