Abstract
This paper delineates the theoretical implications of a program of research on short-term memory using Chinese characters as stimuli, and compares the findings with studies of short-term memory that use English language materials. The 14 experiments on which it is principally based, carried out in the People’s Republic of China and in the U.S.A., are reported in detail in Yu et al. (1984), W. Zhanget al. (1984), and G. Zhang and Simon (this issue). One major theoretical product of this research is an experimentally tested model that reconciles the chunking theory of STM capacity with the articulatory loop theory of Baddeley, making good quantitative predictions of capacity compatible with both. Another result, obtained by using homophones as stimuli, is a demonstration that STM is mainly acoustically encoded, but that there are an additional two or three chunks of visually or semantically encoded short-term memory available. Chunks are shown to play the same role in immediate recall and rote learning in both the Chinese language and English language stimuli; and STM capacity, measured in chunks, is essentially the same for materials in both languages.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1981). The concept of working memory: A view of its current state and probable future development.Cognition,10, 17–23.
Baddeley, A. D. (1983). Working memory.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London,B302, 311–324
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., &Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and structure of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,14, 575–589.
Chase, W. G., &Simon, H. A. (1973a). The mind’s eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press.
Chase, W. G., &Simon, H. A. (1973b). Perception in chess.Cognitive Psychology,4, 55–81.
Estes, W. K. (1972). An associative basis for coding and organization in memory. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory. Washington: Wiley.
Feigenbaum, E. A., &Simon, H. A. (1984). EPAM-like models of recognition and learning.Cognitive Science,8, 305–336.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two. Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review,63, 81–87.
Salame, P., &Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,21, 150–164.
Simon, H. A. (1974). How big is a chunk?Science,183, 482–488.
Vallar, G., &Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Short-term forgetting and the articulatory loop.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,34A, 53–60.
Yu, B., Jing, Q., &Sima, H. (1984). STM capacity for Chinese words and phrases under simultaneous presentations. In National Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Issues in Cognition: Proceedings of a Joint Conference in Psychology. Washington: National Academy of Sciences & American Psychological Association.
Zhang, W., &Simon, H. A. (1985). STM capacity for Chinese words and idioms: Chunking and acoustical loop hypotheses.Memory & Cognition,13, 193–201.
Zhang, W., Peng, R., &Sima, H. (1984). STM capacity for Chinese words and idioms with visual and auditory presentations. In National Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Issues in Cognition: Proceedings of a Joint Conference in Psychology. Washington: National Academy of Sciences & American Psychological Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, B., Zhang, W., Jing, Q. et al. STM capacity for Chinese and English language materials. Memory & Cognition 13, 202–207 (1985). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197682
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197682