Abstract
Two general conceptualizations of recall may be distinguished. One holds that recall is sub-served by memory traces in which representations of different aspects of external events are linked directly to each other. The other holds that these representations are connected via a mediating concept. Formalizations of these views are provided by two theories examined by Ross and Bower (1981a): the “fragment” and “schema” models, respectively. Ross and Bower found that patterns of cued recall of clusters of words with a common theme were predicted well by the schema model, but not by the fragment model. Two experiments reported here show that the reverse is true if the clusters of words are selected randomly. Ross and Bower also considered separately a third theory, the “horizontal” model. However, the horizontal model is shown here to be a constrained form of the fragment model. Another constrained form of the fragment model, termed the “link” model, is introduced and is shown to provide an account of encoding as well as of retrieval that, although it is outstandingly parsimonious, is also approximately accurate. Finally, it is shown that the memory structures characterized by the fragment model may be interpreted as either graphs or digraphs: that is, networks with either bidirectional or unidirectional connections between nodes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abelson, R. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept.American Psychologist,36, 715–729.
Anderson, J. R. (1976).Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.
Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H. (1973).Human associative memory. Washington, De: Winston.
Anderson, J. R., Kline, P. J., &Beasley, C. M. (1979). A general learning theory and its application to schema abstraction. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press.
Asch, S. E., &Ebenholtz, S. M. (1962). The principle of associative symmetry.Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society,106, 135–163.
Bahrick, H. P. (1970). Two-phase model for prompted recall.Psychological Review,77, 215–222.
Bahrick, H. P. (1979). Broader methods and narrower theories for memory research: Comments on the papers by Eysenck and Cermak. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering. London: Cambridge University Press.
Broadbent, D. E. (1981). Association lecture: From the percept to the cognitive structure. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.
Ellis, A. W., &Marshall, J. C. (1978). Semantic errors or statistical flukes? A note on Allport’s “On knowing the meaning of words we are unable to report.”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,30, 569–575.
Foss, D. J., &Harwood, D. A. (1975). Memory for sentences: Implications for human associative memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,14, 1–16.
Hinton, G. E. (1981). Implementing semantic networks in parallel hardware. In G. E. Hinton & J. A. Anderson (Eds.),Parallel models of associative memory. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.
Hollan, J. (1975). Features and semantic memory: Set-theoretic or network model?Psychological Review,82, 154–155.
Jones, G. V. (1976). A fragmentation hypothesis of memory: Cued recall of pictures and of sequential position.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,105, 277–293.
Jones, G. V. (1978a). Recognition failure and dual mechanisms in recall.Psychological Review,85, 464–469.
Jones, G. V. (1978b). Repeated cuing and the structure of recall.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,31, 1–10.
Jones, G. V. (1978c). Tests of a structural theory of the memory trace.British Journal of Psychology,69, 351–367.
Jones, G. V. (1980). Interaction of intrinsic and extrinsic knowledge in sentence recall. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance VIII. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.
Jones, G. V. (1983). Structure of the recall process.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Series B), 302, 373–385. (Reprinted in D. E. Broadbent (Ed.),Functional aspects of human memory. London: The Royal Society, 1983)
Jones, G. V., &Payne, M. S. (1982). Recall and the flexibility of linguistic processing. In A. Flammer & W. Kintsch (Eds.),Discourse processing. New York: North-Holland.
Le Voi, M. E., &Rawles, R. E. (1979). Backward recognition failure: A case of retrieval success.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,31, 609–620.
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1979). Convolution and correlation in perception and memory. In L.-G. Nilsson (Ed.),Perspectives on memory research. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.
Numerical Algorithms Group. (1981).NAG FORTRAN library manual: Mark 9 (Vol. 3). Oxford, England, and Downers Grove, IL: Author.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76(1, Pt. 2).
Richardson, J. T. E. (March 1983).Fragmentation and integration in the retention of complex ideas. Paper presented at the meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society, Manchester, England.
Ross, B. H., &Bower, G. H. (1981a). Comparisons of models of associative recall.Memory & Cognition,9, 1–16.
Ross, B. H., & Bower, G. H. (1981b).Horizontal model— Quartets. Unpublished manuscript.
Rumelhart, D. E., &Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.),Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I. (1944).The teacher’s word book of 30,O00 words. New York: Teacher’s College Press, Columbia University.
Wickens, T. D. (1982).Models for behavior: Stochastic processes in psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.
Wilhite, S. C. (1982). Sentence coding: Tests of the address-contents model and the fragmentation-conceptual focus hypothesis.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,34A, 259–274.
Wilson, R. J. (1972).Introduction to graph theory. Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver & Boyd.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, G.V. Fragment and schema models for recall. Memory & Cognition 12, 250–263 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197673
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197673