Abstract
This paper explores whether free recall performance and organization can be facilitated using computer-controlled interactive presentation, where stimulus presentation on Trial N+1 depends on the individual subject’s prior recall history. A series of experiments investigated the effects of two types of response-contingent presentation order manipulations and of selective tagging manipulation designed to highlight the presentation of previously nonrecalled items. An initial experiment using 20-word lists showed no differences among groups, due to a ceiling effect. Two subsequent experiments, using longer lists (30 and 40 words), found that recall and subjective organization were increased by selective tagging and by presentation orders that preserved the subject’s prior order of recall. The results demonstrate that subjects’ previous recall histories contain information that can be used to facilitate recall. The potential of other interactive manipulations is discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Notes
Kellerman, E.An adaptive query system. Paper presented at the Fourth International APL Users’ Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, June 1972.
Madigan, S. A.Limited-capacity retrieval in free recall. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, November 1973.
References
Bock, R. D.Multivariate statistical methods in behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
Bower, G. H., Clark, M. C., Lesgold, A. M., &Winzenz, D. Hierarchical retrieval schemes in recall of categorized work lists.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969,8, 323–342.
Buschke, H. Selective reminding for analysis of memory and learning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 543–550.
Chomsky, N., &Miller, G. A. Finite state languages.Information and Control, 1958,1, 91–112.
Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 335–359.
Friendly, M. L. In search of the M-Gram: The structure of organization in free recall.Cognitive Psychology, 1977,9, 188–249.
Friendly, M. L. Methods for obtaining graphic representations of associative memory structures. In C. R. Puff (Ed.),Memory organization and structure. New York: Academic Press, 1979.
Friendly, M. L., &Franklin, P. Computer control of memory experiments on a large timesharing system.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1979,11, 212–217.
Mandler, G. Organization and memory. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psvchology of learning and motivation (Vol. t). New York: Academic Press, 1967.
Mandler, G. Association and organization: Facts, fancies, and theories. In T. R. Horton & D. L. Dixon (Eds.),Verbal behavior and general behavior theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1968.
Mandler, G., Worden, P. E., &Graesser, A. C. Subjective disorganization: Search for the locus of list organization.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974,13, 220–235.
Miller, G. A., &McGill, W. J. A statistical description of verbal learning.Psychometrika, 1952,17, 369–396.
Murdock, B. B., Jr.,Anderson, R. E., &Ho, E. Effects of presentation order on learning in multitrial free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974,13, 522–529.
Murdock, B. B., Jr.,Penney, C., &Aamiry, A. Interactive presentation in multitrial free recall.Journal of verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970,9, 679–683.
Paivlo, A., Yuille, J. C., &Madigan, S. A. Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement, 1968,76(1, Part 2).
Pellegrino, J. W. A general measure of organization in free recall for variable unit size and internal sequence consistency.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1971,3, 241–246.
Postman, L. A pragmatic view of organization theory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Tulving, E. Subjective organization in free recall of “unrelated” words.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 344–354.
Tulving, E. Intratrial and intertrial retention: Notes toward a theory of free recall verbal learning.Psychological Review, 1964,71, 219–237.
Tulving, E. Subjective organization and effects of repetition in multi-trial free-recall learning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966,5, 193–197.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by National Research Council of Canada Grant A8615 to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friendly, M., Franklin, P. Interactive presentation in multitrial free recall. Memory & Cognition 8, 265–270 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197614
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197614