Download PDF

Memory metaphors in cognitive psychology

Memory & Cognition volume 8, pages231–246(1980)Cite this article

Abstract

In describing memory phenomena in natural language, a spatial metaphor is typically employed. Memories are considered to be objects that are stored in a mind space, and the process of retrieval is conceived as a search for these objects. It is argued that this metaphor has been carried over into many of the popular theories of memory in cognitive psychology and that seemingly diverse theories employ the same underlying set of assumptions. A survey of the analogies that have been used to explain memory is presented and alternatives to the dominant spatial storage and search assumptions are discussed. The spatial metaphor is evaluated, and the role of analogical explanation in psychology is briefly considered. One result of the increasing number of analogical models is the proliferation of hypothetical mental constructs that are only loosely connected to behavioral measures. nt|mis|A number of members of Ebbinghaus Empire at the University of Toronto contributed analogies that are listed in Table 1 and commented on the views expressed here.

References

  1. Anderson, J. A. A theory for the recognition of items from short memorized lists.Psychological Review, 1973,80, 417–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, J. R. Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 249–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H. Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.Psychological Review, 1972, 79, 97–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H.Human associative memory. Washington, D.C: Winston, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, R. C., Pichert, J. W., Goetz, E. T., Schallert, D. L., Stevens, K. V., &Trollip, S. R. Instantiation of general terms.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977,15, 667–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Atkinson, R. C., Hermann, D. J., &Westcourt, K. T. Search processes in recognition memory. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium. Potomac, Md: Erlbaum, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Atkinson, R. C., &Shiffrin, R. M. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bartlett, F. C.Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bernbach, H. A. Decision processes in memory.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 462–480.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernbach, H. A. Replication processes in human memory and learning. In G. H. Bower & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boring, E. G.A history of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bower, G. H. A multicomponent theory of the memory trace. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bower, G. H. Stimulus sampling theory of encoding variability. ln.A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory. Washington, D.C: Winston, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bransford, J. D., McCarrell, N. S., Franks, J. J., &Nitsch K. E. Toward unexplaining memory. In R. Shaw & J. D. Bransford (Eds.),Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Broadbent, D. E.Decision and stress. New York: Academic Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brown, R., &McNeill, D. The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966,5, 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Campbell, N. R.Physics, the elements. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cavanaugh, J. P. Holographic and trace strength models of rehearsal effects in the item recognition task.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 186–199.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Collins, A. M., &Quillian, M. R. Facilitating retrieval from semantic memory: The effect of repeating part of an inference.Acta Psychologica, 1970, 33, 304–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Craik, F. I. M. Two components of free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1968,7, 996–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. Depth of processing and retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975,104, 268–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Duhem, P.The aim and structure of physical theory. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1954. (Originally published asLa theorie physique, Paris, 1914.)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Estes, W. K. Statistical theory of spontaneous regression and recovery.Psychological Review, 1955,62, 145–154.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Estes, W. K. The statistical approach to learning theory. In S. Koch (Ed.),Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 2). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fisher, R. P., &Craik, F. I. M. Interaction between encoding and retrieval operations in cued recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 701–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Flexser, A. J., &Tulving, E. Retrieval independence in recognition and recall.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Freud, S.A general introduction to psychoanalysis. New York: Washington Square Press, 1952. (Originally published, 1924).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Freud, S. A note upon the “mystic writing pad.” In J. Strachey (Ed.),Collected papers of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth Press, 1950. (Originally published, 1940).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Garner, W. L., Hake, H. W., &Eriksen, C. W. Operationism and the concept of perception.Psychological Review, 1956,63, 149–159.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Glanzer, M. Storage mechanisms in recall. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 5). New York: Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Glanzer, M., &Cunitz, A. R. Two storage mechanisms in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966,5, 351–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hamilton, E.Plato: The collected dialogues. New York: Bollingen Foundation, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Head, H.Studies in neurology (Vol. 2). London: Hodder & Stoughton and Oxford University Press, 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hebb, D. O.The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hesse, M. B.Models and analogies in science. South Bend, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hintzman, D. L. Psychology and the cow’s belly.The Worm Runner’s Digest, 1974,16, 84–85.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hull, C. L.Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hunt, E. L. What kind of computer is man?Cognitive Psychology, 1971,2, 57–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jacoby, L. L., &Crair, F. I. M. Effects of elaboration of processing at encoding and retrieval: Trace distinctiveness and recovery of initial context. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  41. James, W.Principles of psychology. New York: Holt, 1890.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Javnes, J.The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral brain. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  43. John, E. R. Switchboard versus statistical theories of learning and memory.Science, 1972,177, 849–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kantowitz, B. H. Double stimulation. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kahneman, D.Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kaplan, A.The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Katz, J. J., &Fodor, J. A. The structure of a semantic theory.Language, 1963,39, 170–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Keele, S. W.Attention and human performance. Pacific Palisades, Calif: Goodyear, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Klatzky, R. L.Human memory: Structure and processes. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kolers, P. A., &Palef, S. R. Knowing not.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 553–558.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Landauer, T. K. Memory without organization: Properties of a model with random storage and undirected retrieval.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 495–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lockhart, R. S., Craik, F. I. M., &Jacoby, L. Depth of processing, recognition, and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition. New York: Wiley, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Loftus, E. F. How to catch a zebra in semantic memory. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.),Perceiving, acting and knowing. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mandler, J. M., &Johnson, N. S. Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall.Cognitive Psychology, 1977,9, 111–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Mandler, G. Organization and memory. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Miller, G. A. Human memory and the storage of information.IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 1956,IT-2, 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Miller, G. A. Comments on Professor Postman’s paper. In C. N. Cofer & B. S. Musgrave (Eds.),Verbal behavior and learning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., &Pribram, K. H.Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Miller, N. E. Liberalization of basic S-R concepts: Extensions to conflict behavior, motivation, and social learning. In S. Koch (Ed.),Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 2). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Murdock, B. B.Human memory: Theory and data. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Murdock, B. B., &Anderson, R. E. Encoding, storage, and retrieval of item information. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Murdock, B. B., &Dufty, P. O. Strength theory and recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,94, 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Murdock, B., Hockley, W., &Muter, P. Two tests of the conveyer-belt model for item recognition.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1977,31, 71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Neisser, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Norman, D. A. Toward a theory of memory and attention.Psychological Review, 1968,75, 522–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Norman, D. A. (Ed.).Models of human memory. New,York: Academic Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Oppenheimer, R. Analogy in science.American Psychologist, 1956,11, 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Paivio, A. Mental imagery in associative learning and memory.Psychological Review, 1969,76, 241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Paivio, A. Neomentalism.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1975,29, 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Pear, T. H.Remembering and forgetting. London: Metheun, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Posner, M. I., &Konick, A. F. On the role of interference in short term retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966,72, 221–231.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Posner, M. I., &Warren, R. E. Traces, concepts, and conscious constructions. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory. Washington, D.C: Winston, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Postman, L. Organization and interference.Psychological Review, 1971,78, 290–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Postman, L. A pragmatic view of organization theory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Postman, L., &Underwood, B. J. Critical issues in interference theory.Memory & Cognition, 1973,1, 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Pribram, K. H.Languages of the brain: Experimental paradoxes and principles in neuropsychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ratcliff, R. A theory of memory retrieval.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 59–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Rumelhart, D. E. Notes on a schema for stories. In D. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.),Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Rumelhart, D. E., Lindsay, P. H., &Norman, D. A. A process model for long-term memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Schacter, D. L., Eldil, J. E., &Tulving, E. The psychology of Richard Semon.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978,17, 721–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Semon, R.The mneme. New York: Allen & Unwin, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Shiffrin, R. M. Memory search. In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Shiffrin, R. M., &Atkinson, R. C. Storage and retrieval processes in long-term memory.Psychological Review, 1969,76, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Simon, H. A., &Feigenbaum, E. A. An information processing theory of some effects of similarity, familiarization, and meaningfulness in verbal learning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1964,3, 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Skinner, B. F.About behaviorism. New York: Vintage, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Skinner, B. F.Reflections on behaviorism and society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Sternberg, S. High-speed scanning in human memory.Science, 1966,153, 652–654.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Sternberg, S. Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction time experiments.American Scientist, 1969, 57, 421–457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Thorndike, E. L. Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals.Psychological Monographs, 1898,2(No. 8).

  90. Thorndyke, P. H. Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse.Cognitive Psychology, 1977,9, 77–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Townsend, J. T. Issues and models concerning the processing of a finite number of inputs. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Tulving, E. Subjective organization in the free recall of “unrelated” words.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 344–354.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Tulving, E. Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Tulving, E. Memory research: What kind of progress? In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.),Perspectives on memory research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Tulving, E., &Pearlstone, Z. Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966,5, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review, 1973,80, 352–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Underwood, B. J. Are we overloading memory? In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory. Washington, DC: Winston, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Waugh, N. C., &Norman, D. A. Primary memory.Psychological Review, 1965,72, 89–104.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Wechsler, D. B. Engrams, memory storage, and mnemonic coding.American Psychologist, 1963,18, 149–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Wickelgren, W. A. Multitrace strength theory. In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Wickelgren, W. A., &Norman, D. Strength models and serial position in short-term recognition memory.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1966,3, 316–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Woodworth, R. S.Psychology. New York: Holt, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Yates, F. A.The art of memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Purdue University, 47907, West Lafayette, Indiana

    Henry L. Roediger

Authors
  1. Henry L. Roediger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry L. Roediger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roediger, H.L. Memory metaphors in cognitive psychology. Memory & Cognition 8, 231–246 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197611

Download citation

Keywords

  • Semantic Memory
  • Human Memory
  • Memory Search
  • Memory Phenomenon
  • Mental Construct