Abstract
Previous studies of the effects of word characteristics on word recognition have used orthogonal combinations of word variables and have failed to consider individual differences. The present study examined word naming (Experiment 1) and lexical decision (Experiment 2) tasks using an unrestricted set of words and a correlational analysis. Individual differences were considered using a measure of the subjects’ knowledge of the English vocabulary. The results of Experiment 1 indicated that log (RT) for word naming is affected by word length, word frequency, and the number of syllables in the word; the results of Experiment 2 confirmed the effects of length and frequency but also showed that log (RT) is a function of the age at which the word is introduced to a child’s reading vocabulary. Subjects with a high vocabulary score were more rapid in Experiment 1 but were slower in Experiment 2, compared to subjects with a low vocabulary score. More importantly, high-vocabulary subjects, in both studies, were less affected by word length than the low-vocabulary subjects. The results suggest that subjects do differ in their reading strategy and that word length and word frequency may affect different stages in the word recognition process.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References Note
Mewhort, D. J. K., & Beal, L. Personal communication, August 1, 1978.
References
Baron, J., &Strawson, C. Use of orthographic and wordspecific knowledge in reading words aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 386–393.
Browning-Crinion, C., Dolmetsch, R., &Mayzner, M. Variability in word-recognition performance.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1978,11, 212–214.
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., &Richman, B.The American Heritage word frequency book. New York: American Heritage, 1971.
Carroll, J. B., &White, M. N. Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,24, 85–95.
Colegate, R, L., &Eriksen, C. W. Implicit speech as an encoding mechanism in visual perception.American Journal of Psychology, 1970,83, 208–215.
Eriksen, C. W., Pollack, M. D., &Montague, W. E. Implicit speech: Mechanism in perceptual coding?Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,84, 502–507.
Forster, K. I., &Chambers, S. M. Lexical access and naming time.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 627–635.
Frederiksen, J. R., &Kroll, J. F. Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 361–379.
Henderson, L., Coltheart, M., &Woodhouse, D. Failure to find a syllabic effect in number naming.Memory & Cognition, 1973,1, 304–306.
Hirata, K., &Bryden, M. P. Tables of letter sequences varying in order of approximation to English.Psychonomic Science, 1971,25, 322–324.
It pays to increase your word power.Reader’s Digest. September 1976, p. 4. (a)
It pays to increase your word power.Reader’s Digest, October 1976, p. 6. (b)
Klapp, S. T. Implicit speech inferred from response latencies in same-different decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,91, 262–267.
Klapp, S. T., Anderson, W. G., &Berrian, R. W. Implicit speech in reading, reconsidered.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,100, 368–374.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N.Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press, 1967.
Laberge, D. A., &Samuels, S. J. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading.Cognitive Psychology, 1974.6, 293–323.
Mendenhall, W.Introduction to linear models and the design and analysis of experiments. Belmont, Calif: Duxbury Press, 1968.
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 309–321.
Norman, C.The Queen’s English: Standard of literacy among undergraduates in the Faculty of Arts and Science at Queen’s University, 1975–1976. Kingston, Ont: Department of English, Queen’s University, 1977.
Oldfield, R. C. Things, words and the brain.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966,18, 340–353.
Raven, J. C.The Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale: Senior. Form 1. London: Lewis, 1943.
Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., &Rubenstein, M. A. Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1971,10, 645–657.
Smith, F.Understanding reading. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1971.
Spoehr, K. T., &Smith, E. E. The role of syllables in perceptual processing.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,5, 71–89.
Sternberg, S. Memory-scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments.American Scientist, 1969,57, 421–457.
Terry, P., Samuels, S. J., &Laberge, D. The effects of letter degradation and letter spacing on word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976,15, 577–585.
Tukey, J. W. Quick and dirty methods in statistics: Part II. Simple analyses for standard designs.Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Convention, American Society .for Quality Control, 1951, 189–19.7.
Webster’s third international dictionary of the English language: Unabridged. Springfield, Mass: Merriam, 1966.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant A-9581 from the National Research Council of Canada to the senior author. Experiment 1 formed part of a BA honors thesis submitted to Queen’s University by the junior author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Butler, B., Hains, S. Individual differences in word recognition latency. Memory & Cognition 7, 68–76 (1979). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197587
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197587