Abstract
Sentences from each of two different passages were intermixed and presented to subjects auditorily. During each intersentence interval, the subjects made a to-be-remembered (TBR) vs to-be-forgotten (TBF) decision on the basis of theme membership and then selectively rehearsed the TBR sentences for later recall. Presenting either the TBR or TBF sentences in a logical order facilitated sentence recall of both types but had little effect on recognition. The within-subject relationships between decision time and recall were consistent with the between-subject effects of presenting either passage in a logical order on the recall of the remaining passage. Shorter decision times were associated with greater TBR recall but longer decision times were associated with greater TBF recall. It was concluded that processing during the decision phase was different from the maintenance rehearsal found during the TBR-TBF cue-delay interval in directed-forgetting tasks. Ordering of the TBF message did not affect processing if its general theme was not known.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bjork, A. Positive forgetting, the non-interference of items intentionally forgotten.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1970,9, 255–268.
Bjork, R. A. Theoretical implications of directed forgetting. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory. Washington, D.C: Winston, 1972.
Block, R. A. Effects on instructions to forget in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,89, 1–9.
Cicchetti, D. V. Extension of multiple-range tests to interaction tables in the analysis of variance: A rapid approximate solution.Psychological Bulletin, 1972,77, 405–408.
de Villiers, P. A. Imagery and theme in recall of connected discourse.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,103, 263–268.
Dooling, D. J., &Mullet, R. L. Locus of thematic effects in retention of prose.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,97, 404–406.
Geiselman, R. E. Positive forgetting of sentence material.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 677–682.
Geiselman, R. E. Semantic positive forgetting: Another cocktail party problem.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975,14, 73–81.
Geiselman, R. E., &Riehle, J. P. The fate of to-be-forgotten sentences in semantic positive forgetting.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1975,6, 19–21.
Goodman, K. S. Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. In K. Gunderson (Ed.),Language & reading. Washington, D.C: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1970.
James, W.The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: H. Holt, 1890.
Kintsch, W.The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1974.
Kirk, R. E.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth, 1968.
Lockhart, R. S., Craik, F. I. M., &Jacoby, L. Depth of processing, recognition, and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition. New York: John Wiley, 1976.
Pachella, R. G. The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1974.
Ribot, T. A.Diseases of memory: An essay in the positive psychology. New York: Appleton-Centure-Crofts, 1882.
Rothkopf, E. Z. Writing to teach and reading to learn: A perspective on the psychology of written instruction.Seventy-fifth yearbook of the national society for the study of education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976. Pp. 91–129.
Walsh, D. A., &Jenkins, J. J. Effects of orienting tasks on free recall in incidental learning: “Difficulty,” “effort,” and “process” explanations.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 481–488.
Woodward, A. E., &Bjork, R. A. Forgetting and remembering in free recall: Intentional and unintentional.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,89, 109–116.
Woodward, A. E., Bjork, R. A., &Jongeward, R. H., Jr. Recall and recognition as a function of primary rehearsal.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 608–617.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was conducted while the author was at the Department of Psychology, Ohio University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geiselman, R.E. Effects of sentence ordering on thematic decisions to remember and forget prose. Memory & Cognition 5, 323–330 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197578
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197578