Abstract
Are words identified as if they are single-unit patterns, or does letter processing mediate word identification? In the main, accuracy experiments have been found to support the mediated model, whereas recent reaction time experiments have been interpreted in favor of the single-unit pattern hypothesis. In the latter experiments, subjects could search for a target word in a test word as quickly as for a target letter in a test letter. The analysis of these results, however, did not consider the role of parallel processing of individual letters, lateral masking, limited capacity, and similarity between the target and test alternatives. In the present experiment, the advantage of parallel processing of letters in words was attenuated by manipulating similarity. The reaction times showed a processing advantage for single letters over words. This result as well as all of the previous results can be described in terms of processing mechanisms of the mediated model, the same mechanisms that have already been utilized to describe the accuracy of letter and word identification in tachistoscopic experiments.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Averbach, E., &Coriell, A. S. Short-term memory in vision.Bell System Technical Journal, 1961,40, 309–328.
Bouma, H. Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition.Nature, 1970,226, 177–178.
Bouma, H. Visual recognition of isolated lowercase letters.Vision Research, 1971,11, 459–474.
Bouma, H. Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words.Vision Research, 1973,13, 767–782.
Cattell, J. M. The time of perception as a measure of differences in intensity.Philosophische Studien, 1902,19, 63–68.
Chambers, S. M., &Forster, K. I. Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 549–559.
Estes, W. K. Memory, perception, and decision in letter identification. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Estes, W. K., Allmeyer, D. H., &Reder, S. M. Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 1–15.
Garner, W. R., Hake, H. W., &Eriksen, C. W. Operationism and the concept of perception.Psychological Review, 1956,63, 317–329.
Groff, P. Research in brief: Shapes as cues to word recognition.Visible Language, 1975,9, 67–71.
Henderson, L. Do words conceal their component letters? A critique of Johnson (1975) on the visual perception of words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975,14, 648–650.
Johnson, N. F. On the function of letters in word identification: Some data and a preliminary model.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975,14, 17–29.
Massaro, D. W.Experimental psychology and information processing. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1975. (a)
Massaro, D. W. Primary and secondary recognition in reading. In D. W. Massaro (Ed.),Understanding language: An information processing analysis of speech perception, reading, and psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press, 1975. (b)
Reicher, G. M. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,81, 275–280.
Sloboda, J. A. Decision times for word and letter search: A holistic word identification model examined.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976,15, 93–101.
Sperling, G. The information available in brief visual presentations.Psychological Monographs, 1960,74(11, Whole No. 498).
Townsend, J. T. Issues and models concerning the processing of a finite number of inputs. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.).Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1974.
Venezky, R. L., & Massaro, D. W. The role of orthographic regularity in word recognition. In L. Resnick & P. Weaver (Eds.),Theory and practice of early reading. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, in press.
Wheeler, D. D. Processes in word recognition.Cognitive Psychology, 1970,1, 59–85.
Woodworth, R. S.Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, 1938.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by NIMH Grant MH 19399 and a grant from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Massaro, D.W., Klitzke, D. Letters are functional in word identification. Memory & Cognition 5, 292–298 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197573
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197573