Abstract
The processes involved in analogy solving have been an important investigative area in cognitive psychology. Although problem restructuring has been a central construct in problem solving theory, no restructuring processes have been proposed for analogical reasoning. Yet, the stimulus terms for analogies, as they appear on ability tests, are often ill-structured. That is, they are ordered in a way that does not permit direct problem comprehension. In the current study, both perceptual and semantic problem restructuring processes were hypothesized for analogy solving. The independence, stage of execution, and susceptibility to strategic control of the two processes were examined. The results from two experiments indicated that (1) ill-structured analogies are restructured during problem solving, (2) perceptual and semantic restructuring processes are independent and executed at different stages of analogy solving, and (3) both processes exhibited automaticity since repetition of analogy solution attenuated but did not eliminate either restructuring process. A model of analogical reasoning that incorporated both restructuring processes and their execution sequences was proposed. The nature and automaticity of perceptual and semantic analogy restructuring processes were disscussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Note
1. Barnes, G. M.A concurrent model for solving well- and ill-structured analogies. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Kansas, May 1980.
References
Anderson, J. R.Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1976.
Clark, H. H., &Chase, W. G. On the process of comparing sentences against pictures.Cognitive Psycshology, 1972,3, 472–512.
Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. J. Spreading activation theory of semantic information-processing.Psychological Review, 1975,82, 407–428.
Davis, G. A.Psychology of problem solving: Theory and practice. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
Duncker, K. On problem solving.Psychological Monographs, 1945,58(Whole No. 270).
Evans, T. G. A program for the solution of geometric-analogy intelligence test questions. In M. Minsky (Ed.),Semantic infor-mation processing. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1968.
Greeno, J. G. The structure of memory and the process of solving problems. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Contemporary issues in cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium. Washington D. C.: Winston, 1973.
Greeno, J. G. Indefinite goals in well structured problems.Psychological Review, 1976,83, 479–491.
Grudin, J. Processes in verbal analogy solution.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980,6, 67–74.
Hayes-Roth, F., &Mcdermott, J. An interference matching technique for inducing abstractions.Communications of the Association of Computing Machinery, 1978,21, 401–410.
Johnson, D. M. Serial analysis of verbal analogy problems.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1962,53, 86–88.
Luchins, A. S. Mechanization in problem solving.Psychological Monographs, 1942,54(Whole No. 248).
Maltzman, I. Thinking: From a behaviorist point of view.Psychological Review, 1955,62, 275–280.
Mcnemar, Q. Lost: Our intelligence? Why?American Psychologist, 1964,19, 871–882.
Mednick, S. A. The associative basis of the creative process.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 220–230.
Newell, A., &Simon, H. A.Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall, 1972.
Pachella, R. G. The interpretation of reaction-time in information processing research. In Kantowitz, B. H. (Ed.),Human information-processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1974.
Pellegrino, J. W., &Glasser, R. Components of inductive reasoning. In R. E. Snow, P. A. Frederico, & W. Montague (Eds.),Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Cognitive process analysis. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1980.
Pellegrino, J. W., &Lyon, D. R. The components of a componential analysis.Intelligence, 1979,3, 169–186.
Potts, G. R., &Scholz, K. W. The internal representation of a three term series problem.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975,14, 471–480.
Reitman, W.Cognition and thought. New York: Wiley, 1965.
Rumelhart, D. E., &Abrahamson, A. A. A model for analogical reasoning.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,5, 1–28.
Simon, H. A. The structure of ill structured problems.Artificial Intelligence, 1973,4, 181–201.
Simon, H. A., &Reed, S. K. Modeling strategy shifts in a problem solving task.Cognitive Psychology, 1976,8, 86–97.
Spearman, C.The nature of intelligence and principles of cognition. London: Macmillan, 1923.
Sternberg, R. J. Component processes in analogical reasoning.Psychological Review, 1977,34, 353–378. (a)
Sternberg, R. J.Intelligence, information-processing and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977. (b)
Sternberg, R. J. The nature of mental abilities.American Psychologist, 1979,34, 214–230.
Whitely, S. E. Relationships in analogies: A semantic component of a psychometric task.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977,37, 725–739.
Whitely, S. E., &Barnes, G. M. The implications of processing event sequences for theories of analogical reasoning.Memory & Cognition, 1979,7, 323–331.
Whitely, S. E., &Dawis, R. V. The influence of test context on item difficulty.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976,36, 329–337.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was partially supported by National Institute of Education Gant NIE-6-7-0156 to S. E. Whitely and represents part of G. M. Barnes’ doctoral dissertation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnes, G.M., Whitely, S.E. Problem restructuring processes for ill-structured verbal analogies. Memory & Cognition 9, 411–421 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197567
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197567